I can draw a new conclusion: different classroom teaching methods can stimulate students' passive acceptance and rote learning methods, expand the history of students' learning and exploration, and change their interest in learning. "Writing historical prose in question space is a flexible teaching method, which can not only consolidate classroom history knowledge, deepen understanding and raise awareness, but also cultivate students' creative thinking ability and creativity. Key words: the teaching of creative thinking ability of historical prose "Flexible teaching method" aims to stimulate students to learn history, change students' passive acceptance and rote learning methods, and expand the diversity of students' interest space in history department; Students have a correct view of history, so as to learn to dialectically observe and analyze historical and practical problems, deepen their love for the world and their understanding of the country, draw wisdom from history, cultivate the humanity that modern citizens should have and meet the new challenges of the century. This is the basic requirement of the History Curriculum Standard for history teaching. The teaching concept of "learner-centered" in history teaching has attracted more and more attention. The history of essay writing is a flexible teaching method, which can not only consolidate the history of classroom knowledge, deepen understanding and raise awareness, but also cultivate students' creative thinking ability and creativity. Here, historical essays will discuss personal views.
First, the topic is "small but new". Since it is a small piece of paper, you can't find a big perfectionist. The theme should be specific, such as "reading the text", "one thing, one discussion and one supplement" and "one person, one comment", as long as there is a good explanation of the problem. The so-called "new" is the novelty of the topic. Don't follow suit, don't stick to one sentence, and put forward your own opinions based on facts in historical figures and events that are courageous. Where does the title come from? As long as you think hard, there are many precious historical themes to write in heuristic classroom teaching, often paying attention to practical problems and deliberately guiding small appropriate topics. For example, I saw Napoleon; Revelation 1949 65438+ In Truman120, our inaugural address, Loulan's feelings died. Zhao Jun, what can be described? After guiding students to choose the right topic, they are also guided to write novel, concise and creative sentences, and pay attention to the infiltration of disciplines, contact hot issues in real life, and pay attention to the harmony between people, people and society, and people and nature. Second, the material is "fine and real". Don't rush to choose a theme, be sure to prepare the material first. Where did the materials come from? 1。 After reading this book, extract what you need from the materials. 2。 On-the-spot investigation and data collection. 3。 Ask slides, teachers, etc. 4。 The convenience of searching and downloading through the Internet. If there are materials, they should also be sorted out, identified, compared and analyzed, and the rough and refined should be removed, and the false and the true should be preserved. Formal writing can outline first, what to write first and then what to write, and have an overall layout, so as to make the article clear and coherent. The history of thesis writing is to combine history, which is the most important thing to unify the material view. Whether there is history or not, the article loses its soul, and some critics, the article has no history and flesh and blood. Only when history and theory are organically combined can the article have vitality. Three. Write "prospective students", "A good beginning is half the battle." At the beginning of a very important historical prose, the first paragraph should try to contact the theme directly and clearly put forward your own views, what you are in favor of and what you are against. This will also be a bit suspense, causing readers' attention and pursuit. The highlight to be ended is thought-provoking and memorable. So the beginning and end of some experienced documents are working hard for this. The outline of historical writing is the design of the article. First put forward arguments (including general views), and then demonstrate. Parameters, including historical facts and famous sayings. The final conclusion is clear. Because there are several sub-arguments, the arguments cited in them are generally based on the author's own habits when writing for the first time. If necessary, or if the article is long, you can add subtitles to get a clear effect. There are generally three types of training:.
1, directly submitted objects and contents. The objects of comments are people, events, institutions, publications and phenomena. Comments are nothing more than reasons, nature, system state, influence, effect and so on. For example, the historical position of the national bourgeoisie in China during the democratic revolution.
2。 Provide some material proposition analysis. For example, according to the following discussion, please talk about your views on patriotism with relevant facts from abroad. Hitler's "patriotism", Japanese invaders and our patriotism. We must resolutely oppose Hitler's so-called "patriotic" Japanese invaders. Japan's * * * production party and Germany's * * * production party are defeatists in their respective national wars. ..... Our slogan is to defend the motherland and fight against the invaders. For us, defeatism is a sin, and we are duty-bound to strive for victory in the anti-Japanese war.
-Mao Zedong's "The Status of the * * * Producer Party in China's National War" June 5438 +0938 +65438 10.
3。 Put forward one or more viewpoints, arguments or actions to refute. Emperor Yang Di is a controversial figure in history. Some people say that he is "finished in one", and some people say that he "can't turn off his mobile phone." Please make some comments on historical materialism.
Historical composition is mainly to cultivate students' ability to use theory and analytical reasoning. Although it is higher than the textbook, it is still derivative material, which is generally the focus of designing proposition textbooks. Therefore, master the basis of textbook knowledge, guide students to pay attention to thinking, change materials and sublimate the focus of understanding. There are three ways to change the angle of understanding basic knowledge: 1, provide materials or ideas, create new situations to deepen understanding and improve analytical ability. Knowledge came to a conclusion and asked, "Why?" Fact summary training, demonstration and observation ability. 3. Contrastively analyze the knowledge and ability related to students' problem contact.
For example, the reason is the outbreak of the First World War. According to the textbook, the fundamental reason is that the development of political and economic imperialism is unbalanced, and countries that change the balance of power between imperialists create new conflicts between them, and several imperialist countries that form the situation compete for world hegemony and re-carve up colonies. It is the direct reason why imperialist military groups compete for the results of two crazy military expansion preparations. Fighting for the Balkans is one of the three main aspects of this conflict, and the Balkans has become the focus and arsenal of European imperialism. The assassination of Sarajevo, the peninsula in the square, triggered the fuse of war. If we change their problems from different angles, we can deepen their knowledge, training and more knowledge, understanding and thinking, and improve the historical level of integration. You can ask: some people say. World War I was an opportunity for disaster. If it weren't for the Serbian nationalist Crown Prince and his Austro-Hungarian wife, the war wouldn't have broken out and killed them. Please talk about your views on this viewpoint (understanding the dialectical relationship between contingency and inevitability).
Question 2: At the Paris Peace Conference, when Germany represented the Palace of Versailles, the article said: "Some people want us to realize that we are the only culprit in the war, and I myself admit that this is deceptive empty talk." Tell me about the understanding of this sentence (this sentence is the representative of German war crimes, but it can also be seen that this sentence has some truth. Judging from the root cause and direct cause, imperialist countries are particularly eager to wage war. Although Germany is one of the initiators of the war, it is not the only culprit)
Question 3: Combine the causes of the outbreak of the First World War and talk about the relationship between imperialism and war. Or: Why an imperialist war? The political and economic development of imperialism is unbalanced, and the contradictory decisions between imperialist countries will never disappear. It's just different levels. The implementation of imperialist, colonialist and hegemonic policies will inevitably lead to war. Imperialism is modern ...)
Question 4: Compare the causes of the outbreak of World War I and World War II.
Question 5: How did the imperialist countries fight and compete in the Balkans in modern times?
Ask this question 6: Why did two world wars break out? Considering the current situation, please make a prospect for war and peace. The danger of world war still exists, and striving for lasting peace is still the most important political issue in the world, but we can see that many favorable factors for preventing war in the post-war world are still possible. ) Historical prose writing should be clear, accurate and vivid.
Theme and argument should be matched, and the incision of the topic should be smaller. For example, "the modern technology of the whole world,/kloc-the evolution of China's economic modernization exploration in the middle of the 9th century" is easier to prove than "the process of world civilization, the modernization of Britain". To see a close combination and give a consistent theme, the facts must stick to the selected point. For example, to choose the facts that must support this view, when "China/KLOC-the limitation of economic modernization in the mid-9th century" is concerned with the Westernization Movement for political purposes, the weakness of the national capitalist economy and national bourgeoisie, the insufficient capital accumulation and the invasion of China by western capitalism; In order to show personality, understanding should be clear, prominent and particularly creative.
1, vividness, this view should be clear, not contradictory and ambiguous. To tell the truth, know clearly what you support and what you oppose.
2, accuracy, which is a proof of its authenticity and reliability. If the parameters are not accurate, you can't believe them even from a sharp point of view. Argument is historical, it should pay attention to historical data, and when you use it, it must be typical and true. You can't use hearsay or fictional materials seen in novels and movies as parameters. Secondly, referring to historical materials, we can't take things out of context and take what we need, but we can't prove the viewpoint of arbitrarily distorting history. Third, we can't draw conclusions based on isolated evidence.
3, vivid, so that the image of the article should be emotional, lively language. Very sensitive articles are empty, empty soap boxes. After writing a composition, you should also carefully revise it many times. The structure and parameter text of the article must be adjusted, tested, evaluated and reviewed. In addition to themselves, students should also help ask the teacher, because "a threesome must have my teacher!" " "It is not enough to know how to write historical articles. The most important thing is to write more. Only by writing hard and practicing hard can we gradually improve the quality of small papers. I hope students can write short stories boldly, because new things will bring new hope!