plagiarism, drawing lessons from and misappropriating, there are some similarities between the semantics of these words, but there are some points of praise and criticism. Anyone who knows the art industry knows that an artist must learn from the ancients or contemporaries to form his own style, and on this basis, he will temper his own artistic language and form a unique style. Both Chinese and western artists are like this. Usually, it can be divided into the following categories:

1. Copying with the ancients is called learning and inheritance. There is no plagiarism here, only similar styles or no innovative judgments. After China artists became famous, their painting styles often lasted for many years, and they were learned by countless later generations. Even many later generations took pride in imitating the famous artists of the previous generation and made a living, so that they finally formed a painting school.

2. People who learn from their contemporaries are called reference. There are many situations here:

(1) Students learn from teachers and disciples learn from masters. Many teachers or masters like students or disciples to learn from themselves and are proud of it. Because some people learn, it shows that their influence is great, and it is also conducive to further expanding their influence. Of course, a good teacher or master doesn't want students to be like teachers. However, it is not easy for students and disciples to make their works different from those of teachers and masters.

(2) Children learn from their elders. After the famous artists, they often take the initiative to imitate the painting style of their parents, and follow suit, becoming the second and third generations with the same copy. But no one will think that they are plagiarizing. At most, they say that "each generation is not as good as the next".

(3) Learning of contemporary unknown artists. Confucius said: In a threesome, there must be a teacher. Of course, it is understandable that contemporary people learn from each other. The key lies in the method and purpose of learning. Copying, similar, certainly despised. If you can create your own face through learning, it is obviously respected and can be passed down to future generations.

There is a boundary between drawing lessons from and plagiarizing art creation. The fundamental difference lies in that reference is not a copy like a gourd, but a thoroughly remoulded change and maturity after the absorption of French milk, with the purpose of emphasizing the character of the subject "I" instead of following the example;

Plagiarism is to steal beauty as one's own, with the aim of gaining fame and fortune, which is not obviously different from the original in appearance and technique. The composition and form of different painters are basically the same, which belongs to obvious plagiarism; And some painters copy themselves in large quantities for profit, which is also plagiarism.

both of them are contrary to the original meaning of "creation". Of course, if you are learning by learning from the law, you can honestly write "Pro" and "Imitation" on the screen, which is the way of a gentleman. Many fake literati who engage in art are proud of copying others and themselves. Not only do their works not deserve to be called "creation", but their character is also greatly reduced.

Dawei Calligraphy and Painting Network-the fundamental difference between drawing lessons from and plagiarism in art creation. Does the name of an illustration count as plagiarism? Generally speaking, there are two criteria to determine plagiarism in China's judicial practice: First, whether the plagiarized (plagiarized) works are protected by the Copyright Law according to law; Second, whether the plagiarist uses other people's works is beyond the scope of "appropriate citation". Regarding the quantitative limit of "appropriate citation", Article 15 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Trial Regulations on the Protection of Books and Periodicals in China clearly stipulates: "The citation of non-poetry works shall not exceed 221 words or one tenth of the cited works"; "Where the works of one or more people are quoted, the total amount cited shall not exceed one tenth of the total amount of works created by myself". If there are 2 Chinese characters completely or more than 9 characters in a paragraph that are the same, and the source is not indicated, it can be considered as the same. If there are more than five similarities in a work, it can be counted as mild plagiarism; More than 1 places can be counted as serious plagiarism; More than 2 similarities should be counted as plagiarism; More than 3 similarities are serious plagiarism, but how much similarity between novels is considered infringement. There is no clear stipulation in the relevant laws, and it is impossible to generalize how much similarity is considered as infringement. This depends on whether the work itself has caused infringement from the perspective of consumers. Specific analysis of the specific situation. How to define painting plagiarism?

Generally speaking, the following cases are plagiarism:

1. Copying works without the author's consent and posting them on social platforms in his own name.

2. Use software to overlay drawings and publish them in personal name.

3. I borrowed from the composition and didn't indicate the original.

4. altering others' works without authorization, or directly signing one's own signature with works without authorization.

On the technical level, Drawing or Painting is a method of taking a surface as a supporting surface and adding color on it. Those surfaces can be paper or cloth, and the tools for adding color can be brushes, brushes, sponges, cloth strips, etc., and you can also use software to draw.

On the level of artistic language, the meaning of painting also includes the use of this artistic behavior plus graphics, composition and other aesthetic methods to achieve the concepts and meanings that the painter wants to express.

painting accounts for most of the fine arts.