For the behavior that the police station impounds the mobile phone and does not return it, the parties may appeal or accuse it to the police station or the public security organ at a higher level.

Legal basis: Article 191 of the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs: If a party, defender, agent ad litem or interested party commits any of the following acts against a public security organ and its investigators, it has the right to appeal or accuse the organ:

(a) the compulsory measures are not lifted, lifted or changed at the expiration of the statutory time limit;

(2) The bail bond that should be returned has not been returned;

(3) Take measures of sealing up, distraining and freezing the property irrelevant to the case;

(four) the seizure, seizure and freezing should be lifted;

(5) Seizing, misappropriating, dividing up, exchanging or using the sealed-up, seized or frozen property in violation of regulations.

The public security organ that accepts the complaint or accusation shall conduct investigation and verification in time, make a decision on handling the complaint or accusation within 30 days from the date of receiving it, and give a written reply to the complainant or accuser. If the public security organ and its investigators are found to have one of the above acts, they should be corrected immediately.

Extended data

The Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs stipulates that the seized items that have nothing to do with the case shall be returned according to law, and the detained person may hold the seizure list to inquire the public security organs. The specific provisions are as follows:

Article 222 All kinds of property and documents found in investigation activities that can prove the criminal suspect's guilt or innocence shall be sealed up and detained; However, property and documents irrelevant to the case shall not be sealed up or detained.

If the holder refuses to hand over the property and documents that should be sealed up or detained, the public security organ may forcibly seal up or detain them.

Article 225 The seized or sealed-up property and documents shall be checked with the witnesses present and the holders of the seized or sealed-up property and documents, and a list of the seized or sealed-up property and documents shall be made in triplicate, indicating the name, serial number, quantity, characteristics and source of the property or documents, which shall be signed by the investigators, the holders and the witnesses, one for the holder, one for the custodian of the public security organ and one for future reference.

Article 228. If the property, documents, mails, e-mails and telegrams that have been sealed up or detained are found to be really irrelevant to the case, the sealing up and detention shall be lifted within three days and returned to the original owner or the original post and telecommunications department or network service unit; If the original owner is not clear, it shall inform the original owner to claim by announcement. If it is unclaimed within six months after notification to the original owner or announcement, it shall be treated as ownerless property and turned over to the state treasury after registration.

Baidu Encyclopedia-Procedures for Public Security Organs to Handle Criminal Cases