After reading the article "How to punish multiple illegal facts in an administrative punishment case", I learned a lot. I am writing an administrative complaint. The fact that the people's government of Henan Province made the examination opinions can be divided into at least two acts: the staff perjury and the provincial government made the examination opinions. I think this is the way to write a complaint letter. Administrative appeal (draft, to be prosecuted). Review comments were made in February 2020. The judge who insisted on justice told me that Zhengzhou Railway Transportation Intermediate Court accepted the case against Henan Provincial People's Government.

Plaintiff: Chang Ping,1enlisted in June 1983,1retired in April 1997, party member, volunteer (master sergeant). Retirement certificate number is empty. Mailing address: ... Tel: 1378 ...

Defendant: People's Government of Henan Province.

Legal Representative: Yin Hong, governor of Henan Provincial People's Government. Address: No.22 Jinshui East Road, Zhengdong New District, Zhengzhou.

Litigation Request: Request Zhengzhou Railway Transport Intermediate People's Court to make a judgment according to law, and confirm that the official administrative act of the staff of the Review Committee of Letters and Visits of Henan Provincial People's Government using perjury is illegal.

Subject matter: There are only two evidences used in the review opinion of letters and visits made by the Review Committee of Letters and Visits of Henan Provincial People's Government. The two pieces of evidence, "the procedures for equity transfer and the labor contract", are perjury.

When Xuchang Municipal Government entrusted Xuchang Housing Management Bureau to investigate and implement my work transfer arrangement, China Real Estate Development Group Xuchang Company (hereinafter referred to as Zhong Fang Company) provided the "Application for Voluntary Abandonment of Equity I signed" and other evidence to prove that I participated in the restructuring of the decoration company. After investigation and evidence collection, the Housing Authority found it unacceptable and it was forged. Please refer to the minutes of meetings held by the Housing Authority, the investigation records of Xuchang Company of China Real Estate Development Group by the Housing Authority, and the handwritten transcription records extracted by the Housing Authority.

On June 5438+February 65438+February 2008, the Deputy Secretary-General of Xuchang Municipal Government convened Xuchang Civil Affairs Bureau, Xuchang Labor Bureau, Xuchang Personnel Bureau, Xuchang Letters and Calls Bureau, China Housing Corporation and other units to hold a meeting on letters and visits placement in Changping. At the meeting, Mr. Ma was entrusted to extract my handwriting, and Mr. Ma signed the handwriting extraction paper, which was used to ask experts to verify the authenticity of "June 5438 +2004 10, the detailed list of state-owned equity entrustment, and I signed the application for voluntary abandonment of equity". The meeting formed a meeting minutes. Leader Ma conveyed the spirit of the meeting: ① The evidence provided by China Housing Corporation is not credible and belongs to forgery. ② Zhong Fang Company and Xuchang Zhong Fang Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. didn't pay me. (3) Do a good job of implementation for me. Ready to pay my living expenses.

Request the recheck committee of letters and visits of Henan Provincial People's Government to provide written evidence such as "Procedures for Equity Transfer and Labor Contract" to identify its signature and handprint.

I provided a copy of the State-owned Property Rights Transfer Contract filed by Xuchang Municipal Government, and requested Xuchang Municipal People's Government to provide the original to identify my forged fingerprints and signatures.

According to Article 2 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: "Citizens, legal persons or other organizations think that administrative organs