This is a medical malpractice dispute case that has lasted for many years. The protagonist of the incident was the old man who performed the surgery. After being treated by the hospital in 2009, he fell into a coma and became a vegetative state. In 2013, he completely fell into a coma. was pronounced dead. During the investigation, it was found that the hospital was negligent, but the negligence was not directly related to the death of the old man, so the hospital could not be found guilty, so mediation was conducted.
This outcome is difficult for any of the relatives to accept, because before the operation, the old man who was very conscious fell into a coma in the blink of an eye and could no longer survive. Communicate with loved ones. This in itself is a very big gap, and after lying in a vegetative state in a hospital bed for several years and then dying alone, it is even more difficult for the family members to accept emotionally, and they question the hospital's treatment, so they have been I am communicating with the hospital and hope to get compensation. However, during the process of their lawsuit against the hospital, both the first and second instance courts believed that the hospital was not at fault, so the family members were full of hostility towards the judicial authorities and were unwilling to cooperate. It wasn't until 2019 that the family of the elderly man applied for the prosecutor's office to intervene in the matter. Through the prosecutor's comfort and understanding of the situation, they decided to study the case again. The prosecutor found that among the sealed cases in the hospital, there was indeed no CT data or materials recorded in the cases, and the person who signed the surgery notice was not the family member himself? This means that in fact, during the diagnosis and treatment process, the hospital was indeed There is a problem. However, the reason why it still cannot be determined that the hospital was at fault for treating the patient is because the diagnosis and treatment information has little correlation with the final treatment result of the elderly person. The antibiotics used by the hospital cannot be established, but the hospital did have negligence, so the prosecutor hopes that both parties A settlement can be reached.
Everyone takes a step back, the sea and the sky are brighter. After coordination between the two parties, the hospital reached a one-time compensation of 320,000 yuan to the patient's family.