Current location - Quotes Website - Personality signature - What does QQ sign "All laws are predestined" mean?
What does QQ sign "All laws are predestined" mean?
This sentence comes from Buddhism, and all doctrines come from emptiness. It is the essence of nigume's contemporary teachings, the core of the whole Buddhism, and the fundamental feature that distinguishes Buddha's teachings from other religions and heresies. When the Buddha said that the origin is empty, he declared to all beings in the legal world that all laws are lifeless. All laws are empty and lifeless, empty and unreal; Without me, life is life, which is illusion. The reason why the Buddha surpassed any religious personage in the world and was called the Supreme Master and the "Buddha" is that he realized the ultimate truth of life in the universe, that is, there is no life in the original, and revealed this truth to all beings with his open-minded and insightful wisdom. This great discovery of the Buddha brought light to the world, lit the eternal light of wisdom in the hearts of all beings, and eliminated the ignorance in the hearts of all beings. At the same time, it has also dealt a merciless blow to religious people who sing that God is omnipotent and all laws are created by God, as well as pagans who practice all laws.

Let's briefly talk about the principle that all laws are lifeless from two aspects:

The so-called law makers cannot be divided into the universe and life.

First, the origin of the inanimate world view

Cosmic people, or heaven and earth, or time and space. Buddhism is called "Ten Fang III". There is an old saying: "The four directions are the universe, and the universe is the universe from ancient times to the present."

From the very beginning, all creatures have a deep-rooted illusion because of their habitual habits, and think that this world and space-time are real entities with their Heng Chang unchangeable existence. I can't understand the essence of the origin of all laws, so I live in an ignorant state and pursue the wrong things. I am always confused, bound and uncomfortable by the laws of time and space.

Because ordinary people, heretics, Cheng Cheng and even Mahayana scholars who have gained insights can't adapt to the illusion that all laws are harmonious and there is no reason for life, so they insist on teaching and have real life. Or obsessed with the law, or obsessed with others, or obsessed with * * *, or obsessed with nothingness. In the middle view, that is, by breaking the false insistence of four students, the lifeless truth is expressed. Therefore, Long Shu said in "On the Middle View": "All laws are not born by themselves, nor by others. There is no reason not to * * *, but there is no life because of old knowledge. "

Involuntary:

Indian pagans believe that all laws are self-contained. This means that all laws are born.

Among them, number theorists advocate "cause and effect are one". This is spontaneous. The so-called "autogenesis" means that "self-nature can be born from self-nature." This is obviously contradictory. There are all kinds of mistakes in autogenesis:

1. If Dharma can give birth to itself, does it exist before giving birth to itself? If this law already exists, what already exists is equal to what has already been born. Why should it be regenerated? If this method is not self-generated, then self-nature does not exist. The feasible self does not exist yet, so where should we start from? Isn't this ridiculous? Everything that is born by law must have something that can be born. Without the treatment of both sides, the meaning of life cannot be established. As the saying goes, "Life is not life, and life is not life".

2. If Buddhism is born of self-nature, without the condition of karma, then it should be mindfulness, endless, endless, and can be born of self-nature all the time. So this kind of self-reliance is totally unreasonable.

(2) There is no other life:

Seeing that the theory of self-birth was broken, the triumphalist put forward a theory of causality. The so-called "other" is also unreasonable. Because: "If he is not born, life is not him." Yin Gong said: "Everything that originated from this law is closely related to each other and can never be regarded as completely unrelated entities." If the fruit method comes from other methods outside our own scope that have nothing to do with this method, then it should be as the Twelve Gentlemen said: "Cows have the nature of horses, and horses have the nature of cattle." But this is not the case. It is meaningless to say that things do not come from the edge outside the scope of things, but only depend on the edge outside their own scope. Why? "Twelve Doors" has a good answer: "If there is a mat because of cattail, then cattail and mat are one. Grass can't be said to be another cause outside the scope of the mat. The theory that the edges outside the range are equal has nothing to do with the fruit method. If the grass is outside the scope of the mat, you can't say that there is a mat because of the grass. "

It is a common misunderstanding that the fruit-holding method was born from a single other method. I really don't know, since he is just an alias to treat each other, it is a cloud to him and a cloud to him. His so-called self has no entity, but is based on different angles. And "he" calls himself "himself" Therefore, it would be even more ridiculous if he insisted on breaking his life.

(3) unborn:

Qianzi knew that the arguments of "spontaneous" and "otherness" were untenable, so he put forward the idea of "spontaneous harmony" with "mutual cause and effect". In fact, the single self and the unique body of the other are in harmony, and they also make the double fault of self-generation and the life of the other. There is a metaphor: "A blind man can't see the road, and two blind men can't see the road together."

(4) Not without reasons:

Since, he and * * * can't survive. As a result, natural heretics self-righteously put forward the fallacy that all fruits are natural, and some are born without it. Because of its existence and the appearance of various laws in the real world, we can't see their karma, so there is a kind of evil persistence for no reason. Relative to the cause, it can be said that there is fruit. If the law is born without it, whose fruit is the fruit without it? Besides, how can we call it a result without a reason? Isn't this the logical contradiction of natural pagans? In real life, observing the laws of the world, which law is not based on karma? For example, without the hard work of farmers in muddy water, where will there be fruitful results? Without the inventions of scientists and workers, how can there be the development of mechanization and the prosperity of science and technology? If nothing can bear fruit, why don't farmers farm all day in the wind, rain and sun and ask for it? How comfortable is it to lie in bed and wait for the stuffing cake to fall from the sky every day? Workers don't have to work. They have their own cars for you to ride. If there is no cause and effect, then there is no standard for the sin and happiness of all beings in the world. Those who do good can unconditionally fall into three ways, and those who are extremely evil can ascend to heaven. So, who turns evil into good with bodhicitta and benefits all beings? Actually, it is not. It can be seen that the theory of causality cannot be established.

As can be seen from the above analysis, all laws are not self-generated, other-generated, * *-generated, and have no cause, and all laws belong to cause and name. Empty body, no life, no extinction, no self.

Second, the outlook on life without origin.

All sentient beings, without exception, are obsessed with the combination of the four five yin fakes of body and mind, and have never been reluctant to fall in love. When death comes, I hope to live in the world for a long time. I really don't know those four fake bodies, and no one can get them. Just because of my pen name, the essence is empty.

Buddha said that the life and death of all beings is an endless cycle of "twelve karma". Without twelve causes, there is no conscious self. As the saying goes: "If you don't know what you are doing, you know what you are doing", or even "sickness and death". It contains three generations of double cause and effect.

The two branches of ignorance and behavior are the causes of the past; The five branches of knowledge, name, color, touch and love are the fruits of this world; There are three reasons for love, taking and giving. Birth, old age, illness and death are the bitter fruits of the future world. Of these twelve reasons, if any one is removed, the rest are not valid. They are interdependent. Therefore, the twelve karma is empty and has no self. According to the twelve karma, there are sentient beings, and life has no self-nature, so there is no love.

"Twelve Doors" said: "There is no life due to karma. If you call it life, it is single-minded. " It means: twelve causes are vacuum-born without reality. Because of interdependence, each can't exist independently. If you say that the twelve causes have self-nature and can exist independently, can you tell me that these twelve causes exist in one thought at the same time? Or does everyone have one in mind? If there are two things in one mind at the same time, that means cause and effect are born at the same time. At the same time, the law of causality means that if you don't follow the result, there will be a reason, and if you don't follow the result, there will be a result, so you can get neither a cause nor a result. Everything exists without cause and effect. If the twelve-cause method belongs to one in every heart, that is, the first heart is ignorant, the second heart is ok ... and even the twelfth thought is old and dead, so the twelve-cause method becomes an independent individual, and there is no relationship between before and after. Then, the former one dies with the former one, who will give birth to the latter one? The law of extinction does not exist, so how can the law of origin be born after reading it?

If the law of twelve causes decides to have a truly independent self, then it must have twelve branches in one mind or one branch in each mind at the same time. From this analysis, neither of the above statements makes sense. Therefore, the law of twelve causes is empty without self-nature, and the law of twelve causes is empty, so feelings are empty. For example, as the saying goes: "the destiny is empty, and the law of destiny is also."

Through the above analysis and demonstration, we have a preliminary understanding of the Buddha's theory that all Buddhism originates from inanimate objects. If we can observe from time to time with wisdom, both the external universe and the internal body and mind are just harmonious but different laws under various conditions. There is no real life, and there is no real extinction. In this way, our hearts will not always fluctuate with the laws of fate and death, and we will have troubles and pains in secular desires. They will be calm about the changes in the outside world, even the approach of old age. With all laws, nature is empty and unreasonable.

Only by thoroughly realizing the truth that fate is empty can we prove liberation. In this way, we can benefit from life without hindrance, and we can really do it: "Don't do four shots for yourself, think for all beings, and take care of all beings without love or fullness."