With more and more rumors that ZhangJike used private photos of Jing Tian to repay gambling debts, ZhangJike issued a statement denying prosecution, which made Li Weiao, the chief reporter of Economic Observer, very angry. He thought it was the fact that he broke the news, and he hated this powerful figure. He always threatens to sue. Has he ever done such a thing? Doesn't he know?
So he exposed the arrears contract with ZhangJike's signature and handprint. Then, it triggered all kinds of news about ZhangJike.
Now that ZhangJike has been removed from the endorsement, Anta has deleted ZhangJike's publicity materials, which shows that the bad influence has been caused.
Some people think that Li Weiao, as an investigative reporter, is very aware of the legal risks of ZhangJike's so-called "false accusation", and the probability of making mistakes in investigation and evidence collection is not high; If there is a problem, the big probability is also in some details. If the disclosure is true, ZhangJike will not only be discredited, but also his business layout will collapse, and he is likely to bear criminal responsibility.
Some lawyers believe that gambling itself is illegal, and it is also illegal to provide creditors with private videos of others. Creditors use private videos to collect debts from Jing Tian, which is defined as extortion. If ZhangJike colludes with creditors, it constitutes an accomplice.
Some netizens said that there is a dirty soul hidden under the glamorous appearance! If it is a private video given by Zhang, the creditor mistakenly thinks that he can use this card to ask the victim for money. Does it still constitute extortion? If so, whether Zhang is suspected of deliberately framing, misleading or luring creditors, * * * is a light crime! Miss Jing was depressed because her private photos were leaked. Isn't it necessary to investigate the criminal responsibility of a subject?