What do you think of a shoe shine shop in Hangzhou being sentenced to 2 1.9 million for washing limited shoes? I don't think this is normal, because is there a contract for washing shoes, and is there an agreement on the price of sneakers?

Shopkeepers should bear some responsibilities, but the responsibilities are not so great.

This is a shoeshine shop. In the process of shoeshine, the shoes were damaged and repaired without authorization. No matter from the general sense or from the legal point of view, shoe stores should be liable for compensation. There is no doubt about it.

The core issue is how much responsibility the shoe store should bear and how to identify the loss of limited edition sneakers. The special value caused by the limited number of sneakers is beyond the subjective understanding of shoe store owners. Collecting limited edition shoes is a special hobby of small circles. The number of 36,500 sneakers has exceeded the normal cognition of ordinary people, and the shoe owner estimates that there is no special reminder of the special value of shoes. The cost of shoeshine may not be too high, and it is generally difficult for shoe stores to wipe a pair of 36,500 shoes. Based on the cost of shoeshine, the general understanding of the value of sneakers, and the obligation of shoe owners to prompt, I think we should not judge according to the collection value of sneakers, but should judge according to the judgment of normal people.