1. Scientific research spirit and sense of responsibility are very important, which is the basis of all scientific research work, whether for the person who does the project or the person in charge of the project. Otherwise, the passing of the project is nothing more than a bear breaking the stick.
2. distinguish between "customer" and "user", many times they are not integrated. The customer is the investor, but the user is the one who decides the value of your project, whether it can be used or not, and whether it can be done for a long time. It is very important to listen to the voice of users.
3. If the requirements are not fully demonstrated or "holes are dug" during the project demonstration, it is necessary to fill in the whole life cycle of the project. In fact, many projects failed before the project was established, and it was useless to save them later. Only by being cautious can we end well.
4. Adequate demand demonstration is inseparable from in-depth investigation and analysis of specialties, technologies and problems, refining concepts, inducing problems, logical reasoning and judgment. What I imagine sitting in my office is not reliable after all.
5. Don't be afraid of scientific research competition. Embrace it and welcome it. It will let you know yourself, how much you weigh, whether you have underwear or not-the future competition will be more and more open, fair and transparent.
6. Choose the right person in charge of the project, and the project will be half successful. Never underestimate people's subjective initiative when doing things, and the difference between people may be a world of difference.
7. First-rate people can make third-rate projects first-rate, while third-rate people can make first-rate projects second-rate. All this has nothing to do with the nature, category and volume of the project.
8. The organizational level of the project reflects the level of project management. Organization is not a simple division of labor, work and money, but on the basis of clear thinking, do a good job in overall research and thematic decomposition, and let each unit (or person) do appropriate things.
9. from the experience, the problem of the project is first of all the problem of thinking, which is reflected in the overall problem. But many major project managers may have no overall awareness at all, and many projects have no overall awareness at all.
1. A realistic budget and breakdown can make project managers and project managers really suffer a lot less. Participating in research and outsourcing is sometimes just a matter of face, and sometimes it is a matter of strategy. It is meaningful to do things well and will be truly valued. Whenever, we should advance the "circle" and find a "position".
11. Never believe that the project implementation plan made in one month must be "frozen" after examination and approval. We are not gods who can pinch and calculate. People who shout "frozen" every day either really don't understand or have ulterior motives.
12. It is normal to change the project scheme and control the maturity. The better the project, the more often it is "corrected". Only those projects that are getting better and better are often "positively adjusted", and some projects that are constantly falling off the chain or retreating are often "negatively adjusted".
13. There is almost nothing to write about the project management system of many units in the implementation stage, because it is too loose to let go. Can the management of ten thousand, one million, ten million and one hundred million projects be the same?
14. The lead unit should not always think about bullying the participating or outsourcing units. The wind and water will turn around and one day it will bully back.
15. If the lead unit is a calf pulling a cart and can't pull it (everyone doesn't cooperate), it should reflect: either there is something wrong with the idea or the resources are not used well. Within the system, it depends on organization and coordination, and outside the system, it depends on interest incentives.
16. under the peer review mechanism, the opinions of industry experts should be fully adopted without violating the project objectives and ideas. "Listen to people's advice and eat enough", otherwise, it will not only affect the integrity of the project team, but also the reputation of the enterprise.
17. Whether experts' opinions are adopted or not, they should be justified, described, fed back, closed-loop and summarized. More importantly, it is very important to implement specific revisions and improvements in the report.
18. The pace of project implementation should be planned. Many projects fail because they are busy and relaxed. When the whole team is numb, the project can only make do with the problem.
19. The essence of process management of scientific research projects is technical management. Talking about plans, progress, funds, quality, etc. without technology is basically empty talk, and it is not easy to grasp the facts.
2. Project managers should read documents, modify materials and write materials. One is that this is not enough to understand, be familiar with and master the project, and the other is that this is not enough to make personal progress.
21. When reading documents, project managers should form good habits and learn to take them away from the meeting and keep them. Compared with the follow-up project task book, technical report, work summary, etc., the more you look at it, the more you will learn.
22. The project manager or project manager should have two tables, a project statistics table and a project problems and risks table. Only when you blurt out your own project data can you be understood and skilled.
23. If you have the opportunity (in fact, you should do it at your own expense), you must take an IPMP certificate, at least C, and at least B for managing or implementing large-scale complex projects. Otherwise, when you chat with the experts in the circle, you will always be off the same channel, and sometimes it will be embarrassing.
24. At the end of the project, the basis and acceptance criteria must be made clear. This is no time for child's play. It is for this reason that many projects can withstand acceptance and audit.
25. It is necessary to sign the project documents by classification, especially when the project is relatively large. Three, four or five levels of approval or flexible approval are acceptable, but it is absolutely impossible not to approve.
26. Project teams are often composed of departments and units, and project document approval is almost the only means to control project documents except contracts. Please cherish your signature, and sometimes you can really sign or disagree.
27. Meetings are inevitable, but by no means the more the better. The first meeting is to solve problems, including arranging inspection work and coordinating to solve problems; The second is to learn to know people, and it is also a skill to mix circles.
28. Being familiar with policies and understanding the situation is the basic skill of managers. When you are familiar with policies and can participate in planning or top-level system formulation, it marks that your skills have been recognized by the top.
29. Understanding the grassroots or the project team is an important aspect of understanding the project. You don't have to have a meeting. You can have a simple chat when you have a meal or meet on the road.
3. Whether it is an oral report, a written request or a project briefing, oral and written expression skills are very important. If you can't do it, it's never too late.
31. Research in every field must be "specialized". There is the simplest way-go back to the third level of references. After a long time, if you are not an expert, who is an expert?
32. Every project manager, like a chess player, should focus on the project, study, analyze and solve problems, and plan, coordinate and dispatch resources. In particular, we must learn to use leadership, which is the master.
33. In future projects, the gradual implementation of performance evaluation is effective and ineffective, and it is something that every project and its stakeholders should consider at the beginning of the project.
34. Scientific research funds are basically state financial funds, which are essentially taxpayers' money. Doing a good job in the project is not only responsible to the state and units, but also to taxpayers.
35. The personality factors of the project manager, the project manager and even the members of the research group are very important. Many times, how to do things, how to advance them and how to grasp them tightly depend on one or two key people. Never underestimate your role.
36. Project management is not only a science, but also an art, and it is also a profession, which manages both projects and people. Must be combined with the actual unit, the specific situation of specific analysis, is the most applicable.
the 36 suggestions on scientific research project management are not easy, and it is even more difficult to make them!
what do you think, my friend?