Labor contract is one of the most basic evidences in labor arbitration cases. In reality, it is quite common for companies to sign labor contracts with employees without giving them copies. In the event of a labor dispute, the employee can't come up with a labor contract and asks the company for it, but the company won't give it. After applying for arbitration, the company will come up with a labor contract. The problem now is that the labor contract that the company takes out at this time may be forged or altered.
When it is found that the handwriting on the labor contract is not self-signed, you can apply to the labor arbitration commission for handwriting identification to determine the authenticity. But it is such a link that people who are employees often give up. When a decision is made to abandon the application for appraisal, a fake contract becomes a real contract. Why do employees make such decisions? Because handwriting identification requires thousands of dollars in advance.
The problem is that the signature is signed by myself, and the contents of other pages have been changed. This situation is troublesome and difficult to explain. But if it is replaced after a dispute, it can also be judged by identifying the time when the handwriting was formed. If it is proved that the labor contract is indeed forged or altered by the company, the company's behavior will be sanctioned by civil compulsory measures taken by the court in court.
When signing a labor contract, employees and the company seem to have equal status, but in fact they are still unequal. When normal and equal subjects sign a contract, both parties sign and seal it at the same time. But in reality, this is basically not the case when signing a labor contract. Instead, the company first provides a format version of the labor contract for employees to sign, and then the company takes it away and seals it centrally, so it will cause employees to lose the text of the labor contract or the contents of the labor contract to be replaced.