First-level construction engineer’s experience in passing 4 subjects at a time

Sharing an article written by a top construction engineer student, I hope it will be useful to everyone.

First-level construction engineer passed 4 courses at a time.

I don’t dare to talk big here. There are mountains outside the mountains and there is a sky beyond the sky. But based on my experience of passing 4 subjects with high scores in one year, I will just talk about my experience. If you are willing to listen, treat it as a reference for you. If you don’t think so, treat me as a deaf ear. I have no intention of guiding your study. It is just for the preliminary exam. The author is just providing some experiences of old candidates. Thank you for your support and trust in reading the following paragraph. Thank you again and wish you success in passing the exam!

Direction and focus of learning:

The first and first-level construction engineer exams are similar to most other registration exams, and they all belong to the liberal arts. As the name suggests, you can pass the exam by rote memorization;

Secondly, the registration exams are all pass-type exams, which means long live if you pass. They are different from competitive exams such as the college entrance examination, where scores are only required. Higher, there is no highest. Since the above two characteristics determine the direction and focus of our study and review, we only need to get 60% of the score to pass, and there is no need to pursue high scores. Therefore, the focus of our review is to focus on the key points and focus on the difficult points. For chapters that are required to be tested every year, have high scores and outstanding cost-effectiveness, we must strive not to lose points; for chapters that are difficult to understand and memorize and the knowledge points are scattered, we can spend less time or even give up, because we are not pursuing 100 points.

Review the overall ideas and key points:

Learning pays attention to methods, and methods are more important than hard work. My experience is: first: read the book in three passes; second: only do past papers without reading the review question sets.

Study with the three-pass method: the first time is to read the book, browse quickly, master the general framework, and establish the subject knowledge system structure; read the book in detail; the second time is to read the book, browse slowly, combine the courseware study, and understand each lesson To thoroughly understand a knowledge point, read the book very thickly; when reading the book for the third time, combine it with the real questions from previous years, and only look at the areas with high scores and concentrated question points. You must strive to fully understand all chapters with high cost-effectiveness. Make the book very thin, just like a key cheat sheet. Only these key knowledge systems are left in the book; only the past papers are written without supporting exercise sets: Master Chen Yin once said that the level of past papers is as high as Maggie Cheung and Lin Qingxia , and the level of the supporting exercise set is like that of Sister Furong. If you use the level of Sister Furong to take the exam of Maggie Cheung and Lin Qingxia's level, if you can pass, that's your luck. If you fail, that's what you should do; because The reason: The quality of the supporting exercise sets is too low. It is purely a crude product made to make money. It is simply a product of the professor asking a few graduate students to piece together hundreds of pages of exercise sets on the market to make money and sell them. Are you willing to do it? , that's your volition, as if I didn't say anything, thank you.

Key points and key points for review of each subject:

First, relevant regulations:

Recommended teacher: Chen Yin. The first person in the domestic first-class construction engineer regulations subject.

Lecture characteristics: There are many examples in the lectures, and the explanations will not be copied from the books. They are humorous and easy to understand.

Recommended learning methods: Regulations focus on understanding and proficient application, rather than rote memorization. You must grasp the meaning and essence of the original text of the law, because the questions will not include fill-in-the-blank questions. Instead, the original text of the law will be used to give you a scene and event, asking you to make judgments and choices. < /p>

Recommended non-key points: There are various other laws and regulations, which are quite long and involve very few points. You can read them if you have time, but you don’t have to read them if you are short of time.

Second, project management:

Recommended teacher: Gu Yongcai. The first person in the domestic first-level construction engineer project management subject.

Teaching characteristics: Lectures quickly, confidently, and rapidly. He does not follow the textbook step by step, but teaches according to his own understanding.

Recommended learning method: focus on mastering the project management framework system and must master network diagrams. The focus is still on safety management and quality management, as well as the procedures and time memory of contract management, which must be accurate.

Third, Engineering Economics:

Recommended teacher: Mei Shiqiang, I think the first person in the domestic first-level construction engineer engineering economics subject, and some people also agree with Duan Jixiao.

Teaching characteristics: I like to tell you what I think are the key points. It may not be accurate, but it is the teacher’s years of experience and is worth learning from.

Recommended learning methods: Everyone generally thinks that economics is difficult to learn, but I don’t think so.

The first chapter is about the value of time. As long as you understand the principles, no question will be difficult for you. There is no need to memorize, you only need to understand. Typical science learning methods, using liberal arts thinking to learn, will definitely fail. Once you have mastered and understood the first chapter, it will be very difficult for you to lose points, and it will become even more difficult.

The second chapter is finance. This chapter is the most difficult. The difficulty lies in memory. Finance and finance are unfamiliar to everyone. Many concepts need to be memorized. If you encounter a chapter that is difficult to remember, you can directly choose to give up, but The difference from Chapter 1 is that you cannot give up at any point.

The third chapter is project valuation. This chapter is familiar to many people with practical work experience. But please remember that theory and practice are different. Don’t confuse the concepts. It is easy to understand for candidates with a little basic knowledge. The key point is to memorize the procedures and steps, and not to use actual methods to answer exam questions.

For the three chapters of Engineering Economics, the review can be arranged in your own order. If you have no basic knowledge, the value of time in the first chapter will be a headache. It is recommended to study the third chapter first, and then study step by step. Chapter One. The key point is that Chapter 1 must be mastered and used proficiently. Candidates who give up on Chapter 1 will definitely fail the Engineering Economics exam. The scores for the three chapters of Engineering Economics are basically three-thirds of the world.

Fourth, practice:

Practical subjects are divided into more than a dozen majors. I cannot describe them one by one, but one thing is that practical safety management and quality management are also two key points. The score is very high, and it basically accounts for the score of two subjective questions; the network planning test is required, and it also accounts for the score of one subjective question; the investment and capital control test is required, and it accounts for the score of one subjective question. Of course, each subject is not necessarily the same. There is another major premise: there is an element of luck in the practical exam. If you passed the test you just watched, you will undoubtedly pass. If you didn't see the test just now, you will be mysterious.

Question-answering skills:

1. Single-choice questions. If you have a question, you must answer it. If you don’t know, you will get confused. Questions can be answered by elimination, comparison, approximation, etc.;

2. Be cautious about multiple-choice questions. Try not to choose ambiguous questions. It is better to choose less than to guess.

Because the deduction rules for multiple-choice questions determine the answering skills, the specific deduction rules will not be detailed.

3. Subjective questions: See the meaning of the question clearly, answering more is beneficial, answer the question concisely, and no points will be deducted if you write more. The method of scoring points is adopted.

4. The paper must be neat and tidy. Give the grading teacher an impression point. Of course, if your calligraphy is good, it will be better if your handwriting is beautiful. Because the marking teacher gets tired after reading too much. If he sees a confused answer sheet, even if it is all correct, he will not give full marks; if he sees a refreshing answer sheet, he will consider it appropriately even if it is all wrong. Bonus points.

That’s all for the time being. I don’t want to write too much in a wordy way. I hope the above experience will be useful to all prospective construction engineers!