Does the client need to sign the client's name when signing (that is, the signature on the property)? Do you need to write a person's name as a power of attorney on the real estate license, or do both husband and wife need to sign it together? Only one person is needed for direct transfer, and the spouse's ID card and household registration book are required for later tax payment.
If there is a special entrustment, can the client sign on behalf of the client? Whether it is effective or not depends on the specific situation. If it is valid, the following two conditions must be met: 1. The entrustment authority of the client is consistent or inconsistent, but the individual entrustment authority is listed separately and the scope is clear; 2. Two clients entrust the same thing or the same thing. Otherwise, the power of attorney should only write one client and one client, so as not to damage one's legitimate rights and interests.
Does the company bear legal responsibility for signing on behalf of others at the signature place of registered shareholders? There must be authorization, and signing is not allowed.
In the materials submitted for company registration (establishment registration, change registration, etc.). ), if the shareholders and legal representatives are signed by others, it will involve the following issues:
(1) is suspected of submitting false materials. Those who submit false materials to apply for company registration shall be punished by the registration authority in accordance with relevant regulations. If the circumstances are serious, the business license or registration may be revoked.
(2) The rights and interests of the parties may be infringed. A large number of practical cases show that the problem of some shareholders signing their names at will has become a hidden danger that their rights and interests will be violated and internal economic disputes will be triggered in the future. For example, the signature of investors by others may lead to the transfer of shares without the knowledge of shareholders themselves.
In order to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, if the shareholders and legal representatives have been signed by others, they should go to the relevant departments as soon as possible to go through the formalities of reconfirming their true signatures. Specifically, you can go to a notary office, a handwriting appraisal agency, etc. Handle relevant certification documents, and confirm the true signatures of the parties concerned according to law, or by other means that can prove and confirm the authenticity of relevant signatures and seals according to law.
Does the contract signed by others without the signature of the client have legal effect? I didn't sign the cooperation agreement, and whether it has legal effect depends on the specific situation:
1. If your agent signs for you within the scope of authority of the agent; Or you know that someone else signed the cooperation agreement in your name without denying it, then the signature is valid and the cooperation agreement is valid.
2. If someone else signs on your behalf without authorization, beyond the scope of authorization or after the authorization is terminated, the signature of the agent is valid and the cooperation agreement is valid after your ratification.
3. If it doesn't belong to the above situation, the signed cooperation agreement is invalid and has no legal binding force on you.
general rules of civil law
Article 63 Citizens and legal persons may carry out civil juristic acts through agents.
Article 66 An act without agency, beyond agency or after termination of agency can only be ratified by the principal, who shall bear civil liability. If the act is not ratified, the actor shall bear civil liability. Knowing that someone else has committed a civil act in my name without denying it is regarded as consent.
It is illegal for others to sell unsigned land. What legal responsibilities should others bear? Without the consent of the parties, signing in the name of others will bear corresponding legal responsibilities. "The production team has 125 mu of land, and the captain himself chose four people to sign and wanted to sell it." Whether this land is cultivated land or basic farmland, to whom, has it been sold, and is it owned by the state according to law? What is the distribution scheme of "the villagers concerned disagree with the distribution scheme"? Is it the distribution scheme of compensation for land acquisition or the distribution scheme of selling it to others privately? How many villagers disagree, what percentage of villagers are there, who made the plan and who announced it?
As for whether the signatory has legal responsibility and how much responsibility he should bear, it depends on whether the illegal facts have been formed, whether the consequences are serious, whether he should bear criminal responsibility, civil responsibility or not.
According to the provisions of relevant laws, regulations and rules, those who illegally transfer, transfer or lease the land use right owned by farmers collectively for non-agricultural construction shall be investigated for legal responsibility (criminal, administrative and civil) for the crime of illegal land transfer; Illegal occupation of land without approval or deception, or illegal occupation of land by rural villagers to build houses without approval or deception, shall be investigated for legal responsibility (criminal, administrative and civil) for the crime of illegal occupation; Units or individuals that have no right to approve the requisition or use of land illegally approve the occupation of land, or illegally approve the occupation of land beyond the approval authority, shall be investigated for legal responsibility (criminal, administrative and civil) for illegally granting land; All other acts that destroy cultivated land or basic farmland without approval shall be investigated for legal responsibility (criminal, administrative and civil) for illegal acts that destroy cultivated land. If the illegal facts have not yet been formed, they should be corrected.
Does the contract signed by others without the signature of the client have legal effect? This contract is valid for both parties. If the contract cannot be continued due to the failure of the client to sign the authorization, one party may claim the entrustment responsibility from the signatory according to the breach clause agreed in the contract.
Entrusting another bank to sign the notarization authorization, does the client need to be present to sign the office certificate? Only the client needs to bring a certificate and a copy of the trustee's ID card.