I think it must be that some resolutions of the industry Committee are unfavorable to the property. In this case, the property may also be suspected of failing to fulfill the principle of good faith in the contract. Because improper means have affected the exercise of the rights of the other party to the property contract, it cannot be regarded as good faith.
If other losses are caused, such as the expenses clarified or even re-settled by the industry Committee, the other party may also be required to bear them.
It does not constitute a crime at present. If you must rely on crime, it is closer to fraud, but it doesn't count, just a little close.
Supplement:
To put it simply, breaking the law and committing crimes have different degrees.
Breaking the law is light. In crime, breaking the law means criticizing education, fines and detention. If you commit a crime, you can be fined, imprisoned or even executed.
Generally speaking, because the punishment for crimes is very heavy, the public security law will be very cautious. If the law doesn't make it clear, they won't think it's a crime. The punishment for breaking the law is relatively light, so some behaviors that wander on the edge of morality and law can be vaguely identified as illegal and punished by public security.
I'm afraid the criminal law you mentioned is unnecessary, because you mentioned the specific charges under the specific provisions, but the general provisions of the criminal law stipulate that if the suspect's behavior is "obviously minor" and the consequences are minor, then it should not be punished as a crime.
From what you said, it seems that the behavior and results of property are relatively minor and can be solved without criminal law.