I have a beautiful walnut bookcase. A thick, brand-new copy of "The Sherlock Holmes" is sandwiched in the middle. It was this "Sherlock Holmes" that led me into the ocean of books and enriched my life.

Holmes, you know it without saying anything. He is a world-famous and well-known detective. So who shaped him? It is F. Conan Doyle, (1859 ~ 1930), an outstanding British detective novelist and playwright. Famous for "The Sign of Four", "The Return", "Uncanny Valley", etc.

The main story of "Sherlock Holmes" is that Sherlock Holmes is a descendant of a country gentleman. He understands both rural customs and how to live in the city. Through continuous learning, continuous research and continuous practice, Holmes developed his amazing detective abilities. Therefore, the various detectives he conducted were both logical and reasonable; only his explanations and judgments of various cases were clear and logical, and only then were all the lingering problems solved, and only then were all the mysterious cases brought to light.

This book is not only fascinating with its vivid stories, ups and downs in the structure, tense and twists of the plot, gripping and thrilling, which made me unable to put it down, it also embodies a meaningful saying - "Anyone who is diligent can succeed." People have a spirit of perseverance."

Holmes is such a person.

Although he had become a famous detective in England at that time, he was still studying hard. He deliberately rented a small house near the British Museum of Art, and used information and opportunities to study the science and experience of detectives, so that he could solve various mysterious cases and finally make the crime known to the world.

I think: Sherlock Holmes has been studying all his life, and has been studying the science and experience of detectives. His indomitable spirit is worth learning from our teenagers.

I love reading this book "Sherlock Holmes" which has benefited me a lot.

/p>

I originally thought this book was just about how Mr. Holmes solved the case, but when I read it carefully, I found that this book also gave me a lot of truths, such as Watson’s first meeting with Mr. Holmes, Watson’s encounter with In the first incident "A Study in Scarlet", Sherlock Holmes said that a person's mind is originally like an empty house. You must selectively put some items into it. A fool will encounter such and such things. Everything was put in, but the knowledge he really needed was either nowhere to be accommodated, or at best, it was mixed with a lot of messy things. Therefore, he felt particularly inconvenient when calling it... Watson thought Mr. Holmes at first. Many of his ideas were simply fanciful and exaggerated, and he felt that Holmes mixed meticulousness with absurdity. In "A Study in Scarlet," a murder occurred in Lauriston Gardens, and the police were very poor. They searched for clues at the crime scene, but they only found some easy-to-find things. They had no clue about the incident. When Mr. Holmes came to the crime scene, he pointed out the shortcomings of those stupid guys-they destroyed Laurie when the crime occurred. There were traces of carriages on the lawn of Stone Garden, but they did not affect Mr. Holmes's detection procedures much. He discovered many interesting things step by step, but ordinary people saw that the things that Mr. Holmes found interesting were just small details. A very common thing. Their value is often ignored, a value that can bring the case to light. I think they must have been very regretful when they finally found out. Watson followed Mr. Holmes and listened to the "nonsense". , but how did he know that there was sufficient evidence behind every "nonsense"? When the case was revealed, Watson was greatly impressed, and he changed his view and attitude towards Mr. Holmes's subsequent cases. He had no doubts about Mr. Holmes's reasoning, because he believed that Mr. Holmes would tell him the truth he wanted to know.

Mr. Holmes was very careful in choosing what to put in the small room of his mind. He selectively loads tools that can help him in his work, and he keeps all these tools in order and arranges them in an orderly manner.

I am usually a sloppy person who does not pay attention to details, and many things have been messed up because of this. Although no one is perfect, Sherlock Holmes is already perfect. If it is true that there are imperfections, That is, this person does not exist in the world, he is a fictitious person. From letting go of many small things to not letting go of any small things. This is what I'm looking for.