First, "A thousand people have a thousand Hamlets in their eyes." Shakespeare himself didn't say that it was invented by China people. As for who invented it, there is no textual research.

Second, "there are a thousand hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people, but it must be hamlet first." This sentence was also invented by China people. Inventor, himself

Then I took this as my signature.

Why do you say that? In fact, the source is still about three wonderful things that have been circulating for a long time in literary criticism. Later, my friends and I attributed them to the "three gods".

What is "theism"?

They are "have the courage to write", "don't like to roll" and "Chanlet"

"Have the courage to write", also known as "refuse to write" or "love to write", that is, "have the courage to write a book by yourself", which is roughly equivalent to a popular saying circulating on the Internet later called "You can do it, but you can't."

"Don't like rolling" means "If you don't like watching, roll. Who let you see it? "

These two reactions are most likely to occur when one's favorite works are criticized. Both of them are typical with hips and no IQ, and there are many arguments to refute them, so I won't go into details here.

Among the three kinds of theism, the most puzzling one is "Thousand Letts", that is, "There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand readers". Shakespeare didn't say this sentence himself, and I don't know what the purpose of China people who first invented this sentence was. Later, it gradually became a fig leaf of subjectivism, and then it became "honey in a nail, arsenic in a nail" and so on.

Its core significance lies in that there is no objective standard for literary criticism, because every reader is independent and has different experiences, aesthetics and subjective feelings, so the interpretation of the work is uncertain and irregular, but you can blow it as you want, and be as black as you want. Anyway, it's just Hamlet in your personal eyes.