Don't play football, just watch the ball game ~
-
It is often seen that a friend uses the word "fake fans" when criticizing another person, but what exactly does "fake fans" mean? I think it is necessary for us to discuss this issue today.
Pseudo is actually relative to "truth". If there is no truth, then there is no "false". What should a "true fan" look like?
The definition of 100 people may be 100. Let's see what these friends say first:
"If the Rockets are eliminated, they won't watch the playoffs? Fake fans! "
Obviously, here, his definition is: Even if the Rockets are eliminated, you should continue to watch the playoffs, so as to be a "real fan".
"Yao hei, if the rockets don't face the Mavericks today, are you still a Mavericks fan?"
His subtext is: A VS B, if you call yourself a team b fan because you hate team a, then you are not a real fan.
In other words: If you are a real fan of Team B, then you will pay attention to their games with any team.
Having said that, let's take a look at the definition of fans: people who like a certain sport or a certain team or even a certain player.
Note that there is no reason to like it here.
Whether it is because the players come from the same country, region, city, alma mater or something else;
Whether you know this sport or not, you are even an expert or even a master of this sport;
Whether you like being on the same team as your critics or not;
Whether you like the same team forever or not;
But we often see friends' comments, as if their definition of fans is far more than that.
They will say, "You know nothing about the ball. You don't deserve to be a fan. "
They also said, "Yesterday you said you were a fan of Team A, but today you have changed. What kind of fan are you? "
They even said, "You don't have autographed photos, you don't have on-site support, you don't even pay attention to every game, and you call yourself a fan."
Writing here, I feel dizzy. What kind of people are fans? Who are the fake fans? Again, "fans" are just words that these people use to blame each other when they quarrel.
If you don't know the ball, you are not a fan. Then who in this world really knows the ball? TV commentator? Players and coaches of the national team? NBA players? Or the head coach of the NBA championship?
If you don't watch the rest of the playoffs after watching the rockets, you are not a fan. How many playoff games have you watched? You have finished watching this year's competition, but you have something to do, but you can't watch it. What should I do? Am I still a fan?
This reminds me of a netizen's blog. He wrote in an article commenting on Buddhism:
Any religion has "duality" (hehe, my vocabulary). At the high end (enterprise development), its worldly wisdom and profound theoretical theory will attract a large number of intellectuals, while at the low end (windows desktop development? ), often through prayer, prayer, worship and so on to attract ordinary people, through the ages, Chinese and foreign religions, is it true?
Therefore, because he is a programmer, "enterprise-level development" refers to a master, who doesn't know much about what we say and rises to a philosophical level. "windows desktop development" refers to pediatrics, which is what we call ordinary fans.
Judging from his article, basketball can also be divided into two realms. At the high end, basketball is an abstruse sports science, where many professionals explore. At the low end, we are ordinary people. We pay attention to it only for personal preference, not for the development of basketball, although we are also part of the contribution.
Because we are all personal preferences, in the process of attention, some people scold, some people comment, some people use the emotions of fans to gain their own interests, some people vote just to watch the all-star game, some people start, and then some people criticize, some people hate, and some people find that the media is using our preferences to make money. These are all easy to understand.