If the other party applies to the labor arbitration institution for labor arbitration on the grounds that you don't perform the forged labor contract, you can file a false contract objection to the arbitration institution, apply for handwriting judicial appraisal, and then see what the other party has done or reflected; If the other party insists on the appraisal, with the consent of the arbitration institution, the two parties shall determine the appraisal institution and appraiser with the qualification of appraisal through consultation. If the other party does not agree with the appraisal, it means that the other party has realized the risk of losing the case brought by forged handwriting, and the arbitration institution may refuse to accept the arbitration application or terminate the arbitration.

For relevant legal provisions, please refer to Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Procedure.

"Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Procedure" Article 25 When a party applies for authentication, it shall submit it within the time limit for adducing evidence. In accordance with the provisions of the provisions of article twenty-seventh, unless the parties apply for re identification. If a party who bears the burden of proof for matters that need to be appraised fails to apply for appraisal or pay appraisal fees in advance or refuses to provide relevant materials within the time limit specified by the people's court without justifiable reasons, so that the disputed facts of the case cannot be identified through the appraisal conclusion, it shall bear the legal consequences of being unable to prove the facts.

Twenty-sixth parties to apply for appraisal after the consent of the people's court, the two sides should negotiate to determine the appraisal institutions and appraisers with appraisal qualifications. If negotiation fails, it shall be designated by the people's court.

Twenty-seventh parties have objections to the appraisal conclusion made by the appraisal department entrusted by the people's court, apply for re-appraisal, and provide evidence to prove that one of the following circumstances, the people's court shall allow it:

(a) the appraisal institution or appraiser does not have the relevant appraisal qualifications;

(2) The appraisal procedure is seriously illegal;

(3) The evidence of the appraisal conclusion is obviously insufficient;

(4) Other circumstances that cannot be used as evidence after cross-examination.

If the conclusion of defect appraisal can be solved by supplementary appraisal, re-appraisal or supplementary cross-examination, it will not be re-appraised.