On the afternoon of July 15th, 29, Southwest Jiaotong University held a briefing on academic issues, and internally reported the school's findings on Huang Qing's "plagiarism" incident: plagiarism was established. According to the academic problems verified by the school, the academic Committee of Southwest Jiaotong University decided to cancel Huang Qing's doctorate in management; Revoke Huang Qing's postgraduate tutor qualification. Many professors affirmed the timely notification of the situation by the school.

On July 15th, 29, at 4 o'clock in the afternoon, middle-level cadres, masters and doctoral tutors of Southwest Jiaotong University rushed to the International Academic Lecture Hall one after another to attend the temporary academic briefing held by the school. At the entrance of the building, the school arranged three security guards and a number of teachers to "check" and prohibit media reporters from entering the venue. Teachers attending the meeting need to sign before entering the meeting.

at 4: 3 pm, the academic briefing officially started. Huang Qing, the vice president involved in the "plagiarism" incident, also came to the scene. But he just sat under the stage. On the stage were: Chen Chunyang, director and president of the Academic Committee, Fan Pingzhi, vice president, and Academician Qingqun Qian, director of the Academic Ethics Committee. Because there are many teachers attending the meeting, many teachers can only stand in the back row and at the entrance of the academic hall.

several professors attending the meeting said that the briefing was very simple and lasted only over 2 minutes. Two academic issues were reported at the meeting, one of which was Huang Qing's "plagiarism" incident. The school said in the notice that the academic Committee of the school officially received the report materials in December 27. Subsequently, the school immediately started to carry out relevant work, and in strict accordance with the procedures for handling academic problems, the graduate school of the school first organized an anonymous review by experts from the "Management Science and Engineering" discipline outside the school. After that, the academic committee of the school invited experts from the same industry recognized at home and abroad to make another judgment. After more than a year's meticulous work, the expert group voted on the nature of Huang Qing's academic misconduct, and concluded that the plagiarism in the fourth chapter of Huang Qing's doctoral thesis was established and its nature was serious.

On July 1th, 29, academic degree evaluation committee of our school held a plenary meeting, and voted to pass the opinions on handling the academic misconduct of Huang Qing: according to the relevant regulations and rules of the state, the Ministry of Education and the school, the school decided to cancel Huang Qing's doctorate in management; Revoke Huang Qing's postgraduate tutor qualification.

After reporting the relevant information, Chen Chunyang, director and president of the Academic Committee, reiterated that Southwest Jiaotong University has a history of more than 11 years and has always adhered to the tradition of "rigorous scholarship and strict requirements". No matter in the past or in the future, the academic misconduct of teachers and students in our school will be dealt with seriously once it is verified. Many professors affirmed the president's position.

At the end of the briefing, Huang Qing, who was sitting under the stage, hurried to the rostrum. "I thought the school arranged for him to take the stage to express his position, but I didn't know that he took the microphone and began to speak. He said that he seemed to be' judging' him today, but he himself thought it was a' unjust case'." A participating teacher said that what Huang Qing said on the stage made many teachers on the scene feel a little "unexpected". Because what Huang Qing expressed on the stage was that his doctoral thesis was a publicly released textbook. He insists that quoting textbooks is a matter of course and should not be regarded as plagiarism ...