On June 19, Tong Qiang, who was detained in Shangrao No.2 Detention Center, asked questions from reporters. He seems unwilling to deny the reporter's question. Tong Qiang told reporters, "At that time, there were about thirty or forty of them, while there were only seven of us. Wu Yisheng followed him with a gun and knife. I didn't shoot Wu Xlin, and I didn't shoot it at the scene. There is no scene. I fired two shots. I said this at the detention center at that time, and I said that as long as Wu Yisheng's father was willing.

If I want to pay for the civil part, I will admit that I shot Wu Xlin. I tried my best to carry it for him, but I wanted to comfort his father. Besides, I was a minor at the time of the crime, so it's no big deal to deal with it. "

In order to find out whether Tong Qiang was really a minor when he committed the crime, so that his legal age of responsibility is no longer controversial, the reporter met Tong Qiang in Shangrao No.2 Detention Center and asked him for proof. He looked a little flustered and said, "I have two brothers." I rank third at home. This soldier is my brother. He didn't use my ID card to be a soldier. I was really underage at the time of the incident. "

Who lied about the murder?

Shangrao Intermediate People's Court of Jiangxi Province (2007) Rao Zhong Punishment-Zi Chu No.36, the first-instance judgment dated 165438+2007 10/6, made the following judgment on the shooting at the "Golden Rust Jiangnan" construction site in yugan county on September 1 2006:

1. Defendant Wu Yisheng was convicted of intentional homicide, sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life.

2. Defendant Wu Shousong committed the crime of harboring and was sentenced to two years' imprisonment and suspended for three years.

In the face of the heavy first-instance judgment, we interviewed many witnesses and people involved. Everyone is thinking about many different opinions about the shooting and murder. Who is lying?

According to Wu Yisheng's defense lawyer, the physical evidence inspection report produced by Yugan County Public Security Bureau is also unconvincing. The physical evidence materials submitted by the police are shotgun bullets extracted from the body of the deceased Wu Xlin and bullets extracted from the black Santana car that Wu Yisheng escaped. In fact, if there is no doubt that there is another black gun, then the shotgun pellets on the black Santana car are controversial. Wu Yisheng shot and wounded Li Xchun. In order to confirm whether there is a causal relationship between Wu's death and Wu Yisheng, in addition to the shotgun pellets extracted from the deceased Wu Xlin and the shotgun pellets extracted from Wu Yisheng's black "Santana" car, there are gauze fragments and blood samples of Wu Xlin and Li Xchun at the scene. In order to be cautious in reconnaissance, the police should also send the shotgun pellets extracted by Li Xchun for inspection, which is more in line with legal requirements and reconnaissance common sense.

Wu Yisheng said that he also made a statement during the trial. Why didn't he get investigated and accepted by the court? Why not give Wu Yisheng a chance to go to court with Hu, but let the police file a case for investigation and transfer Wu Yisheng to the procuratorate for "intentional homicide"? There were several shots at the crime scene. Who shot and killed Wu Xlin? Have the police fully investigated the source of the black guns and found all the black guns at the crime scene? There is a lot of talk about this murder. Who is lying? Why do the police keep suspicious records? Is it reasonable, legal and common sense to send physical evidence for inspection?

Before many doubts in the case were eliminated, Wu Yisheng was put on file for investigation and transferred to the procuratorate separately for "intentional homicide", which was unbelievable. On June 19, Xu, deputy director of Yugan County Public Security Bureau in charge of the murder case, said that he would not accept any interviews from media reporters.

As a result of the verdict, the suspect and his son shouted.

Wu Yisheng, a criminal suspect sentenced to death in the first instance, recalled the incident and the trial process to reporters. "On the day of the incident, I wrapped my rifle in my black coat. I was shirtless. The first shot I fired was at their scattered clearing, the second shot hit Li Xianchun's hip, and the third shot hit Li Xianchun's abdomen. I really didn't shoot anyone else. I didn't do Wu Xiaolin's death. "

Wu Yisheng said, "When the police questioned me, I saw that the materials they asked were different from what I said, so I refused to sign for confirmation. They threatened me to sign as long as the meaning was similar. They won't let me eat, drink or sleep until I sign it. Later, they told me to sign it if you don't want to be beaten. Later, I couldn't stand the hunger and fatigue of having no food, no water and no sleep, so I signed a record that was different from what I said. "

Wu Yisheng refused to accept the first-instance judgment. He said: "The jury just finished the trial and asked me to donate my organs. I was wrongly sentenced. I hurt Li Xianchun. This should be intentional injury. I didn't kill anyone. I didn't kill Wu Xlin. "

Wu Yisheng's father told reporters that this shooting and murder case is full of doubts. We have great doubts about this case. Why didn't the police send the shotgun pills for inspection and extract them from Li Xianchun? Whether the gun that the son wounded Li Xianchun left fingerprints; Many clues indicate that there were three guns at the crime scene. Now that two guns have been found, whether the third gun is found or not, we all suspect that the third gun killed Wu, and the public security organ never mentioned this gun from beginning to end.

Wu Shousong told reporters that there are many unsolved doubts in this case. Now I am very worried about the judgment and trial of the second instance. Now I want to ask the law to give this case a fair judgment, severely punish the murderer and clear my son's name.