(2012-03-31 15:36:40) Reprint▼ Tag: Reprint original address: Can the inquiry transcript and on-site inspection transcript be printed? Author: Tobacco Training Wang Chuanan With the improvement of office automation, many Handwritten things are beginning to be replaced by computers, and paperless office is no longer something out of reach. However, many people have doubts about whether various documents in law enforcement can be printed using computers, especially whether interrogation transcripts and on-site inspection transcripts can be printed instead of handwritten. (1) Asking if the transcript can be printed. Some people say that asking for a transcript is a "transcript", and "transcript" should be written in pen and cannot be printed. In fact, this is a misunderstanding. The so-called interrogation transcript is to record the content of the parties’ statements as a form of fixed evidence. Whether to record with a pen or a computer is not the essence of the issue, as long as the content is objective and true. In the past, it was called "transcript" because there was no printer and the only way to record was with a pen. For example, the main means of transportation in ancient times was horse-drawn carriages. In many places in our country, highways are called "horse roads." Is it true that only horse-drawn carriages are allowed and cars are not allowed to pass because they are called "horse roads"? For another example, ancient currency was made of metal, so it was called "money". Nowadays, paper money is still called "money". The name has a certain contemporary feel, so don’t be too rigid in its form. The court's trial transcripts are also "transcripts," but the court has several handwritten ones, almost all of which are typed, and no one will deny their validity. In fact, there are many advantages to using a computer to print out interrogation transcripts. First, it is fast and the paper is neater. Second, the parties can modify it on the computer before printing, so that the transcript will not be changed beyond recognition. Third, it is not easy to be printed out. tamper. Of course, if the law enforcement officer's computer skills are poor, it is better to record the information with a pen. (2) Whether the on-site inspection transcript can be printed is the same as the inquiry transcript. The key to whether the on-site inspection transcript is valid is not whether it is handwritten or printed, but whether it is legal and objective. As long as the on-site transcript content is objective, true and complies with the law format, and it is produced on-site. I think that the effectiveness of on-site inspection transcripts cannot be denied just because they are printed. There is no law or regulation that stipulates that on-site inspection transcripts can only be handwritten and not printed. There are relatively few printed on-site inspection records. The main reason is that the equipment level and personnel skills of most administrative agencies are not up to par. They do not have the equipment and operators to integrate input and printing. They cannot carry printers every day to investigate cases. The site is waiting for you to find power supplies and install printing equipment. (3) Can the signatures in the transcript be printed? One type of signature is a manual signature, one is an electronic signature, and the other is a seal signature. The unique feature of these three methods is that they represent the uniqueness of the individual. Since some agencies implement online approval, they use online signatures for some internal documents, which is a need to improve case handling efficiency. Some external documents with official seals, such as notices, can be printed and signed. However, evidence documents must be signed by the person handling the case and dated. Even if the name is printed, the signature must be confirmed in the blank space next to it. This is a requirement for the form of evidence. Without the personal signature of the above-mentioned person, this evidence has no probative value. A signature embodies a certain degree of personal identity. The signature has two functions. The first is to prove that he participated in the process, and the second is to prove that he recognizes the content of the transcript. Since the transcript is an important evidence document, whether it is handwritten or printed, the final signatures of the law enforcement officers and parties must be handwritten. If the signature is also printed, once the party denies it later, the printed signature does not meet the qualifications for identification and cannot prove the above two facts. (4) Can on-site transcripts be handwritten on site and then printed when returned to the office? On-site inspection transcripts are the first-hand information for the administrative law enforcement agencies to grasp the illegal behavior of the parties within the first time. Its biggest feature is its on-site nature. Article 28 of Order No. 12 stipulates that when inspecting the scene where a suspected illegal act occurred, law enforcement officers should prepare inspection records and submit them to the parties for signature or other means of confirmation. This means that the transcript should be made at the time of the inspection and handed over to the parties for signature on the spot. The time and place of the inspection should be entered on the on-site transcript, which is also the time and place where the transcript will be produced. If it is printed out afterward, the transcript is not made on-site, and it cannot be called an on-site transcript.