AI's attack ability is too strong. It is really amazing and explosive that a man of his height can become a top star in the NBA, despite his outstanding physical explosive talent. In that year's finals, Kobe defended Ai because he really understood the strength of his opponent, so he later wrote that those who looked down on Iverson now have no chance to compete with him.
In terms of offensive technology, AI is innovative. I found that few people pay attention to the innovation of basketball technology, and privately think that Iverson's dribbling technology does provide a very competitive solution for many short, thin and fast people. In particular, his crossing skills are really classic-when he first came out, he was often blown away by old-school referees. Later, the alliance reached a * * * understanding, and this is not blowing. It can be said that almost no defender has a good hand after that without drawing nutrition from him.
The difference of Kobe Iverson is that Kobe's defense is better than Iverson's, and Iverson's attack is stronger: Iverson won four scoring titles, three of which were won under hc. Kobe's two scoring titles were both won under the prohibition of hc rules. After the hc rule was banned, the guards' scores generally rose, and Kobe Bryant was the one who rose the most. In terms of talent, except for height and strength, Kobe is basically Iverson. There is little difference in comprehensive strength between the two. Finally, I'm not saying that Kobe has no strength. He is very strong. He can even be said to be a master of basketball offensive skills, and he also works hard to make progress. On the whole, I admire him. But his achievements really touched the light of the Lakers. If his career is in an ordinary team, I think his upper limit is Iverson. It is even possible to lead an overdraft prematurely and become another Hill and McGrady.