Or a company that invests in the same project with you, and then you made the bidding documents together when you made the documents. When you got the document, you got mixed up when you signed it. Someone else signed your bid document.

First of all, allow me to euphemistically assume that this is the case.

1, the authorization of the tender documents must be authorized to the personnel of the unit as the project authorizer to sign the relevant documents, and the tender documents will take effect. Of course, the authorized person and the unit need to have labor relations and social security relations, which definitely needs to be reflected in the business documents.

2. When an authorized representative signs the tender documents, the tender documents will have legal effect, that is to say, the signature will take effect. The bid authorizer is the authorizer of the project, and completes and exercises all rights and obligations within the scope of authorization on behalf of the bidding unit. All documents shall be signed by the authorized representative, indicating the approval of the bidder.

3. The bank said that the signatory was not the authorized representative of the bidder, and there was a problem. The bidding documents need to be signed by the authorized representative, but the name of the person who actually signed them is not the authorized representative, which means that the authorization is valid and the signature is invalid. Only the signature of the authorized representative is valid. Of course, if it is signed by a legal person, it is also valid, provided that the legal person signs it in person, so the issue of power of attorney can be completely ignored.

4. Assume that the signer's name is the authorized person of other units involved in this project. As a bidding agent, as well as operators such as expert committees, they will take this matter seriously. There are three reasons. 1) Whether there is an association between two companies participating in the same project. 2) The relationship between the authorizers of two units involved in the same project. 3) Whether there is pure violation of discipline and collusion in the tendering unit signed by two authorizers.

5. As for the documents, since mistakes are found in the bidding documents, it means that the bid opening has ended or is being opened, or is in the bidding stage. If mistakes are found on the spot, the bid will be scrapped on the spot. Then another company may be lucky enough not to be discovered and enter the bid evaluation link. The premise is that the staff at the bid opening site did not find it, or found it as a mark and submitted it to the bid evaluation Committee for review. If the bid evaluation experts don't find it, or the experts don't think there is a problem with another unit, then another unit is an effective bid, depending on how the bid evaluation committee determines it.

I hope my answer is helpful to you.

In other words, not only the bidder who signed the wrong bidding documents will lose the qualification to participate, but also another company will lose the qualification to bid. Serious cases may also be reviewed and punished by the supervisory department.