The two sides of rural land replacement have no signature as the basis, but there is physical proof as the dividing line. Is it legally effective?
1, is it an exchange of land? This is effective. 2. Although no written evidence has been signed, it can still be used as evidence, and in fact, the land of both parties has actually been exchanged, which means that the land exchange agreement has actually been fulfilled. The law does not stipulate that land exchange must be in written form. So the land exchange agreement in this case is valid.