Signing a demolition agreement is not a forced demolition. This is reasonable and legal, and can only be handled through consultation with your two brothers. Follow-up: isn't it illegal for one of the three brothers to demolish the house without signing it in place? Answer: No, if you have different opinions, you must come out before signing the contract. If you don't bring it up and the contract has been fulfilled, you have no right to speak. Unless your name is on the property certificate, even then you can only find your two brothers now. Follow-up: My parents inherited an old house with an area of 100 square meter, and my mother died first. Before my father died, the three brothers and my brother-in-law wrote an agreement in private. Big brother 15 square meters, second brother 25 square meters, my sister 15 square meters, I 45 square meters. Now the local demolition of old houses will compensate for the construction of a 95-square-meter building. The local policy is to divide houses according to household registration. My family of three has a local hukou, which is divided into two houses. The secretary said that the 95-square-meter house built in the old house has nothing to do with me. It belongs to my big brother and second brother. I feel dissatisfied. The old house is a 95-square-meter house that my parents inherited from three brothers, and the policy compensation. Why can't I enjoy the 45-square-meter house I inherited? If our brothers write an agreement. (The eldest brother left behind has adopted an uncle, and the second brother is the top father) Request an answer! Thank you for the follow-up: I always refused to sign, but my two brothers agreed to sign, and their opinions could not represent mine.