It is suggested that peers must have a preliminary understanding of several key points usually considered by national evaluation experts, and must pay attention to avoiding the following aspects:

1, foreign tutors are weak, for example, there are too many tutors in China or part-time jobs in China.

2. The applicant's own quality is not too hard, and his academic, professional and scientific research abilities are relatively low. Make up a few things.

3. There are research projects. The research topic is too broad, the research plan is not specific and urgent, and the applicant's research topic is basically irrelevant or has a low correlation with the study abroad plan.

4. The major of the unit to study abroad or the foreign partner is inconsistent with the training direction of the applicant, or the research topic is inconsistent with the dominant major of the visiting school.

5. The applicant has had the experience of studying abroad, but has not achieved remarkable results after returning to China, so there is no need to go abroad again.