The annual comprehensive assessment results are divided into four grades according to grade, ability, basic ability and incompetence.

After the civil servants have been assessed by the assessment committee, the person in charge shall issue the assessment grade and affix a seal on the assessment opinions. After that, the appraisee will be informed of the evaluation results. After receiving the notice of evaluation result, the appraised person will fill in the "My Opinion Column" and sign it after agreeing with the evaluation opinion. Refute if you disagree.

Extended data:

Examination method of probation period

First, the absolute evaluation method:

(1) management by objectives

Management by objectives is a performance appraisal method that decomposes the overall objectives of an organization into individual objectives step by step, and finally evaluates the performance according to the completion of the work objectives by the assessed. Before the work begins, the appraiser and the appraisee should reach an agreement on the content, time limit and evaluation standard of the work to be completed. At the end of the period, the appraiser will make an appraisal according to the appraiser's work and the original appraisal standard.

(2) Key Performance Indicator Method

Based on the annual target of the enterprise, the key performance indicator method determines the key quantitative indicators reflecting the comprehensive performance of enterprises, departments and employees in a certain period by analyzing the performance characteristics of employees, and conducts performance appraisal on this basis.

(3) Grade evaluation method

According to the job analysis, the grading method divides the job content of the evaluated post into several independent modules, and in each module, the work standards required to complete the work of the module are described in clear language. At the same time, the standard is divided into "excellent, good, qualified, unqualified" and other grade options, and the evaluator evaluates the completion of each module according to the evaluator's actual work performance. The total score is the employee's assessment score.

(4) Balanced Scorecard

The balanced scorecard evaluates the enterprise from four angles: finance, customers, internal business processes, learning and growth, and gives different weights to each index according to the strategic requirements, so as to realize the comprehensive evaluation of the enterprise, enable managers to grasp and control the enterprise as a whole, and finally realize the strategic objectives of the enterprise.

Second, the description method:

(1) all-angle evaluation method

All-angle assessment method (360 assessment method) is an assessment method for superiors, colleagues, subordinates, themselves and customers to assess the assessed. Through this multi-dimensional evaluation, combined with the opinions of different evaluators, a comprehensive and fair evaluation can be obtained.

(2) Important event method

Important events refer to "important events" collected by appraisers at ordinary times. The "important events" here refer to those events that will have a positive or negative impact on the overall performance of the department. These performances should be recorded in writing. According to these written records, the appraisal results will be formed finally.

Quantitative performance management method is to scientifically process data, timely and accurately assess and coordinate the implementation of income, ability and distribution relations in different periods and under different working conditions.

Third, the target assessment method:

Target performance appraisal is a process of decomposing the overall goal and implementing the responsibility from top to bottom. Accordingly, performance appraisal should also be subject to the completion of the overall goal and sub-goals. Therefore, as the KPI assessment of departments and positions, we should also start from the standpoint that departments support the whole company and employees support departments.

At the same time, the leaders of companies and departments should also be responsible for the performance appraisal of their subordinates, and they should not shirk their responsibilities to their subordinates. Performance appraisal distinguishes between departmental assessment indicators and individual assessment indicators, and can also ensure that superiors can actively care for and guide subordinates to complete tasks from the mechanism.