According to the provisions of the Administrative Punishment Law, the administrative organ must organize a hearing, which is limited in terms of the scope of cases of administrative punishment, that is, if the administrative organ makes a case of major administrative punishment such as ordering to stop production or business, revoking the license or license, and imposing a large amount of fine, the administrative organ must organize a hearing. In addition, the administrative organ may organize a hearing when it deems it necessary. In other words, not all administrative punishment cases must be heard. Restricting the scope of hearing cases is based on the principle of fairness and efficiency, which not only ensures the efficiency of administrative organs in handling administrative punishment cases, but also pays attention to the construction of democratic procedures in administrative punishment procedures. Although hearing is an important right of the parties involved in administrative punishment, according to the provisions of the Administrative Punishment Law, hearing is not a necessary procedure for administrative punishment. Only hear cases of administrative punishment within the scope prescribed by law. After the hearing, the clerk will submit the hearing record to the parties for review or read it out to them. After the hearing is verified, the presiding hearer, the parties and the agent shall sign and seal the hearing record, and the part of the record about the testimony of the witness shall be submitted to the witness for verification.
After the hearing, the host shall make a hearing report in time. Hearing is an internal review procedure, which should play the role of "safety valve". Therefore, the hearing report issued by the administrative punishment hearing and the opinions on the facts, evidence, punishment basis and punishment suggestions of the case play an important role in the final decision of the person in charge of the administrative organ.