Receiving the police, accepting the report, filing a case, investigating and collecting evidence, informing and making a punishment decision (or issuing a mediation agreement). According to Article 99 of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment, the time limit for public security organs to solve public security cases shall not exceed 30 days from the date of acceptance; If the case is serious and complicated, it may be extended for 30 days with the approval of the public security organ at the next higher level. In order to find out the case, the time limit for making friendly decisions is not included in the time limit for solving public security cases.

Extended data

Acceptance of filing materials refers to the activities of public security organs, people's procuratorates or people's courts to receive and shelter persons or materials who report, accuse, report and surrender.

According to Article 84 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the public security organ, the people's procuratorate or the people's court shall accept the materials of reporting, accusing, reporting and surrendering, regardless of whether they are cases under their jurisdiction.

Then transfer it to the competent authority for handling in accordance with the provisions of jurisdiction. Those who report, accuse, report and surrender orally shall be seriously inquired and interrogated, and the contents shall be recorded in the record. If there are any opinions, they should be allowed to correct them. After verification, it shall be allowed to sign or seal the record.

The staff who accept complaints and reports shall explain the legal responsibility of false accusation and frame-up to the complainants and informants, and ask them to be realistic, loyal to the facts and loyal to the law. However, false accusation is different from false accusation. Because false accusation and frame-up is the behavior that the actor deliberately fabricates facts and evidence and accuses others of committing crimes out of nothing.

Misrecognition is that the confession of the actor is different from the facts because of cognitive errors. They are completely different in nature. The former is intentional and should be investigated for legal responsibility according to law. The latter should explain the situation to him and let him learn a lesson, rather than pursue legal responsibility.

The public security organ shall protect informants, complainants, informants and their close relatives from retaliation and ensure their safety. Informants, accusers and informers who are unwilling to disclose their names and report, accuse or report their acts shall keep them confidential in criminal proceedings.

However, in the trial stage, it is not restricted by this provision. Article 47 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that a witness shall testify in court. Otherwise, the materials for reporting, accusing and reporting cannot be used as the basis for finalizing the case. Therefore, in this case, you should explain the reasons to them, ask them to testify in court or agree to disclose their names and the contents of the report, complaint and report.

In judicial practice, anonymous reporting should be analyzed in detail: on the one hand, because everyone is reported anonymously for fear of retaliation, its content is likely to be true and has evidential significance; On the other hand, it may be for the purpose of false accusation, or to divert the attention of judicial personnel and make false materials to report anonymously. Therefore, before verification, the materials reported anonymously can only be used as clues to the source of the filing materials, but not as the basis for filing the case.