According to the provisions of Article 14 of the Provisions on the Working Procedures for the Trial of Disciplinary Cases in party member, under normal circumstances, before the case is submitted to the Standing Committee of the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level for decision, people should be sent to talk with party member who made mistakes, check the wrong facts and listen to my opinions. If I disagree with the punishment decision and the factual materials on which it is based, I shall write a written material. If you don't have the writing ability, the speaker should put his opinions into written materials and hand them in for signature. When talking with party member who made mistakes, we should do a good job of conversation record.

According to Article 7 of the "Procedures for the Trial of Disciplinary Cases in party member", the lower-level party committees and disciplinary committees shall submit the following materials to the higher authorities for approval: (1) asking for approval; (two) the punishment decision and the wrong factual materials on which it is based; (3) Investigation report and main evidential materials; (four) the review opinions of the relevant disciplinary committees and party organizations at all levels; (five) the inspection of party member who made mistakes and the opinions on the punishment decision; (6) Party organizations' wrong opinions on party member.

A case transferred by the Supervision Department of the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level shall have the following materials: (1) Basis for filing a case; (two) the wrong factual materials, the opinions of the inspected person on the wrong factual materials and the explanation of the inspection team on their opinions; (3) Investigation report and main evidential materials; (4) written examination by the inspected person. Cases transferred by administrative supervision organs, public security organs, people's procuratorates and people's courts shall have the following materials: (1) Cases transferred by administrative supervision organs shall have handling opinions or decisions, investigation reports, main evidential materials, meeting materials with me, my opinions and explanations of relevant organizations; (two) the case transferred by the public security organ, there should be the main evidence of the administrative punishment decision or administrative compulsory measures, as well as my inspection, confession and other materials; (3) The case transferred by the people's procuratorate shall contain a copy of the decision on exemption from prosecution or non-prosecution, a report on the end of investigation, the main evidence extracted or copied, my confession and other materials; (4) A case transferred by a people's court shall contain an indictment, a written judgment or ruling, extracts or copies of major evidence, and materials of my own confession. Article 8 stipulates that the judicial department or judicial personnel shall accept the cases reported by the discipline inspection commission at a lower level, transferred by the supervision department of the discipline inspection commission at the same level or transferred by the administrative supervision organs, public security organs, people's procuratorates and people's courts after examination, if they meet the provisions of Articles 6 and 7 of these Provisions.

To sum up, have your questions been answered?

legal ground

"Provisions on the Working Procedures for the Trial of Disciplinary Cases in party member" Article 7 A case submitted by a lower-level party committee or discipline inspection commission to a higher level for examination and approval shall have the following materials:

(a) Request for approval;

(two) the punishment decision and the wrong factual materials on which it is based;

(3) Investigation report and main evidential materials;

(four) the review opinions of the relevant disciplinary committees and party organizations at all levels;

(five) the inspection of party member who made mistakes and the opinions on the punishment decision;

(6) Party organizations' wrong opinions on party member.