The evidence in the administrative procedure law specifically includes: documentary evidence; Physical evidence; Audio-visual materials; Electronic data; Witness testimony; Statements of the parties; Appraisal opinions; As well as transcripts of inquests and on-site transcripts. However, the evidence must be verified by the court before it can be used as the basis for finalizing the case.
On-the-spot record is a unique type of evidence in administrative litigation, which is characterized by: it must be made by administrative law enforcement personnel; Must be produced in the process of administrative law enforcement; Must be presented at the scene of administrative law enforcement; Legal procedures must be observed. If a party refuses to take notes or sign on the spot, or is unable to sign, it will not affect the use of evidence, but law enforcement officers shall indicate the reasons. If there are other people at the scene, they can sign it.
I hope the above content can help you. If in doubt, please consult a professional lawyer.
Legal basis:
The evidence in Article 33 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China includes: (1) documentary evidence; (2) Physical evidence; (3) Audio-visual materials; (4) Electronic data; (5) Testimony of witnesses; (6) statements of the parties; (7) Appraisal opinions; (8) Records of inspection and on-site records. The above evidence can only be used as the basis for determining the facts of the case if it is verified by the court. Article 34 The defendant bears the burden of proof for an administrative act and shall provide evidence of the administrative act and the normative documents on which it is based. If the defendant fails to provide evidence or fails to provide evidence within the time limit without justifiable reasons, it shall be deemed that there is no corresponding evidence. However, if the sued administrative act involves the legitimate rights and interests of a third party, unless the third party provides evidence.