At present, the voting results show that there are 15 All-Stars in the North Zone, with as many as1person from teams in Liaoning and Beijing provinces, and as many as1person from teams in Guangdong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces in the South Zone. It is not difficult to see from the world that CBA all-star voting has become a big competition for the number of fans.
Now, the CBA this season has reached 2 1 round. The best player in North District is scoring champion Adams, averaging 40.2 points, 6.7 rebounds, 8.65 points and 438+0 assists. He should be the strongest competitor of the best team in the North District. Changdong Yu, who averaged 14.8 points, 7.4 rebounds and 2. 1 3-pointers per game, is also the best domestic inside player in North District, but neither of them made the 15 player list. What is even more frustrating, however, is that China's first attacker, Shandong first brother Ding Yanyuhang, was not selected in the 15 list.
The voting result in the Southern District is slightly better than that in the Northern District, but it is also seriously inconsistent with the performance of the stadium. Controversial Ashland won more than three times the votes of popular Wang Hu, but Zhejiang brothers were not on the list of 15. What is even more ridiculous is that Bayi, as the last team, has four finalists in the top four of 15. Guangsha Hu, who ranked first, was the only one elected, still at the bottom.
Such a result is unacceptable. This result is also a disgrace to the overall image of China fans-are we China fans really so amateur? Perhaps, in the case that the voting result has not yet been determined, CBA has introduced some additional measures in line with public opinion, which can also make this year's all-star starting lineup less water.
CBA All-Star Voting is not an entertainment draft, and the model selection needs a system that conforms to China's national conditions. The selection of the best teams in many European sports is conducted by experts (team coaches and captains) and senior sports journalists. On the other hand, the United States, on the basis of catering to fans, has introduced a voting method for the starting lineup based on fans, on the basis that most fans are very professional.
The All-Star Voting System of CBA League in China copied the way of NBA, with the starting lineup selected by fans and the reserve lineup selected by coaches. However, China's basketball has only been professionalized for 23 years, and its real professionalization is less than 10 years. China fans' understanding of basketball itself cannot be compared with that of American fans. The vast majority of rational fans did not participate in the voting because they were not familiar with the network operation or had a weak sense of voting. In this context, copying the NBA is obviously inappropriate.
To solve the problem of lack of fairness and objectivity in CBA voting at present, in fact, solving two links can plug the loopholes.
Summary: First, set up a more reasonable voting system from the system. According to the technical statistics, the top 10 players in five positions are optimized, and then the top five players in each position are ranked by experts, media and fans within this range. Finally, experts, media and fans voted 3: 3: 4 to calculate the points.
Secondly, as a form of basketball culture communication, we should strengthen the incentive measures. Encourage fans to participate in voting through media publicity, setting up signature souvenirs and watching the All-Star Game draw on the spot. Fans with the same voting result and the final result can also get the opportunity to reward all-star souvenirs (more likely to win prizes). This can maximize the participation and fairness of voting.