First of all, if the electronic bidding documents of different bidders are similar, the bid evaluation committee shall reject their bids in accordance with the bid evaluation methods and standards stipulated in the tender documents, and the tenderer shall confiscate their bid bond in accordance with the provisions of the tender documents.
Secondly, if the electronic bidding platform detects one of the following acts, it is regarded as collusive bidding.
(1) Filter different bidding documents made by the same computer;
(2) Calculate the summary score and assist the bid evaluation experts to judge. If the score is abnormal, it will be regarded as collusion;
(3) All links are traceable, all data are automatically filed, and the whole process can be traced, which can realize dynamic monitoring, real-time early warning, intelligent assistance and whole process recording. Once the problem is found, it is regarded as collusive bidding.
So what behaviors will be identified as collusive bidding?
1. The bidding documents are exactly the same, such as the same format, the same font and the same table color.
2. In the bidding documents, the mistakes are consistent.
3. In electronic bidding, the IP addresses registered by different bidders are the same, or the IP addresses are in a specific area.
4. The bidding documents of different bidders shall be compiled by the same computer or printed by the same auxiliary equipment.
5. The binding form, thickness and cover of the bidding documents are similar or even the same.
6. The bidding documents of one bidder are bound together with the documents of another bidder's name, such as the signature of the legal representative or authorized agent of another bidder and the official seal of another bidder.
7. The bidder's representative doesn't know the telephone number of the company's boss.
8. Different bidders sat in the same car before the bid opening, talking and laughing, but pretended not to know each other at the bid opening site.
9. The total bid price of different bidders is unusually consistent, or extremely different, or changing regularly.
10. The total bidding amount of different bidders is similar, but the itemized quotation is unreasonable without reasonable explanation.
1 1, intentionally nullifying the bid, and the winning bidder abandons the bid without justifiable reasons, or fails to sign a contract with the tenderer as required.
12. Deliberately make invalid bidding documents according to the invalid bidding clauses specified in the bidding documents.
13. After the bidder has registered three times or more in one year and purchased the bidding documents, it will no longer submit the bidding documents or attend the bid opening meeting.
14. Before the deadline for submission of bid documents, several bidders issued statements to withdraw their bid documents almost simultaneously.
15. The bid bonds of different bidders shall be paid through the same account.
16, multiple bidders use the bid guarantee issued by the same person or enterprise.
17, with the same after-sales service terms.
18, intentionally omitting the signature of the legal representative.
19. The signature of the legal representative in the bidding documents comes from the same person.
The whole process of electronic bidding brings convenience to tenderers and bidders, but it also inevitably breeds illegal activities.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd