After SARS in 2003, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council attached great importance to emergency work, and in 2005, they issued the National Overall Emergency Plan and a number of special plans, and in 2007, they promulgated and implemented the People's Republic of China (PRC) Emergency Response Law. The Civil Aviation Administration actively implemented the relevant work requirements of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, and successively took the lead in formulating two national special emergency plans, namely, the National Emergency Plan for Handling Civil Aircraft Flight Accidents and the National Emergency Plan for Handling Hijacking Incidents, initially established an emergency management system, and organized civil aviation units to respond to or participate in many emergencies. However, with the gradual deepening of emergency work, some deep-seated problems are gradually exposed.
First, there is a lack of unified definition of civil aviation emergency work responsibilities. The work practice in recent years shows that the interaction between emergencies and civil aviation activities is very complicated, and civil aviation emergency work should not be limited to aircraft accidents and hijacking incidents. However, due to the lack of a unified definition, there are still obvious differences between the emergency work carried out by some units and the responsibilities and obligations that should be fulfilled.
Second, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the contents of civil aviation emergency work. Emergency response includes prevention and emergency preparedness, monitoring and early warning, emergency disposal and rescue, and post-event recovery and reconstruction. However, in practical work, emergency treatment is generally equated with emergency response, and there is a huge gap between the actual work content and the requirements of comprehensively strengthening emergency management.
Third, there is a lack of correct understanding of civil aviation emergency work methods. The complex process of emergency response and its complex relationship with civil aviation activities determine that civil aviation emergency response needs the extensive participation and full cooperation of all units and their internal institutions, and establishes and improves the management system and working mechanism according to the principle of networked organization. However, in actual work, the working system of some units is not perfect enough and the mechanism is not smooth enough.
Fourth, the foundation of civil aviation emergency work is not solid enough. Civil aviation is one of the few industries in China that implement unified supervision and management. The current system determines that all aspects of emergency response will eventually be implemented in civil aviation enterprises and institutions. Therefore, there is a certain gap between the general provisions of the Emergency Response Law and the actual situation of civil aviation. If this problem is not solved, the role of civil aviation enterprises and institutions will not be fully exerted, and there will be no solid and reliable foundation for strengthening civil aviation emergency work.
The above factors make some units lack crisis awareness, insufficient resources, inadequate preparation in advance, unclear job responsibilities and low emergency response ability, making it difficult for civil aviation management departments at all levels to organize, coordinate, supervise and inspect. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate and promulgate the Regulations on Civil Aviation Emergency Management in China to promote the comprehensive strengthening of civil aviation emergency work. Second, the preparation process
In 2006, the Civil Aviation Administration of China set up a writing team of "Overall Emergency Plan for Civil Aviation Emergencies in China", but the effectiveness of the plan was insufficient in the drafting process. With the consent of the leaders of the Civil Aviation Administration and the General Office, the writing team decided to draft the General Emergency Plan for Civil Aviation Emergencies in China and the Regulations on Civil Aviation Emergency Management in China simultaneously in 2007, and in June 2008, with reference to the Emergency Response Law, the Civil Aviation Law and other relevant laws and regulations, combined with the practical experience in strengthening civil aviation emergency work in recent years, the regulations (draft for comments) were completed. After analyzing, summarizing and adopting more than 90 opinions (suggestions) from various units, a review meeting was held in Xi 'an from September 18 to September 19, 2008, and 16 expert representatives from the Civil Aviation Administration, regional administrations, security technology centers, some airlines, airports and other units were invited to review the regulations one by one. On June 5438+ 10, 2008, it was submitted to the Regulation Department of Civil Aviation Administration for review. From June 5, 2008 to February 2009, the Regulation Department of CAAC held a regulation review meeting in Beijing. After the meeting, the Regulation Department and the writing team revised and improved the regulations again according to the review opinions. 2010 65438+125 October Daily was submitted to the executive meeting of CAAC for examination and approval. Third, the basic content
The "Regulations" consists of eight parts: general rules, management system and organization, prevention and preparation, prediction and early warning, emergency treatment, aftermath treatment, legal responsibility and supplementary provisions. The "Regulations" clarify the responsibilities and contents of civil aviation emergency work; The principle of implementing hierarchical response is put forward. Based on the principle of network organization structure, the emergency management system is planned, with the emergency work leading group of CAAC as the leading institution, the leading group office as the core institution and all functional departments of CAAC as the working institutions. The complex relationship between emergencies and civil aviation is explained accurately. The basic contents and requirements of all aspects of civil aviation emergency work have been stipulated accordingly.
The purpose of these Provisions is to clarify the basic concepts, principles and requirements of emergency work, focus on emergency work not specified in existing civil aviation regulations, and strive to be consistent with existing civil aviation regulations. In addition, an exception clause of "other civil aviation regulations implemented before the promulgation of these Provisions have other provisions on the specific contents of civil aviation emergency work, which shall prevail" has been added in the supplementary provisions to meet the needs of strengthening emergency management through overall planning on the premise that the responsibilities of the original institutions remain basically unchanged.