Current location - Quotes Website - Team slogan - Hebi boy was killed by a dog. Facts have proved that it is necessary to ban dogs. Do you agree?
Hebi boy was killed by a dog. Facts have proved that it is necessary to ban dogs. Do you agree?
If the city has no supervision ability, I suggest banning it. I like dogs too. My family used to have a dog, but now I hate dogs more and more. The streets are full of shit and dog urine. Yesterday, I was fine with my child, and a puppy suddenly ran over and yelled at us because it scared my son.

Our neighbor downstairs keeps a dog and often doesn't close the door. He wanted to stand at the door and tell others not to go up and down the stairs. Two days ago, he saw a woman with two dogs, and one of them took a shit. She didn't rush to get rid of the shit, but looked around. When she saw me, she slowly took the paper out of there, and then slowly took it out to the pile of shit and folded it back and forth. I really don't have time to stare at her. I guess she didn't clean it. Such things happen too often. The propaganda of civilized dog keeping posted in the community is useless. If the sticker is low, I think the dog will shit next to it. Our feet become sticky when we walk. See if we stepped on shit.

Our urban environment is getting better and better now. Flowers and grass are planted everywhere. Some cities require that there are no cigarette butts in many meters on the street, and we are covered in shit and dog urine, which stinks and makes all the beautification in vain. It is useless to rely solely on propaganda. There must be punishment and supervision. Really put into practice, you can't see a shit dog urine on the street.

Civilized people don't have dogs. Everyone knows that raising a dog disturbs people. Only people who don't do things and shout slogans will say and shout such slogans, because it is impossible to appease those who don't have dogs and are disturbed by dogs. It is reasonable to ban dogs in cities. Never let the happiness of a few people be based on the sacrifice of most people, and let most vulnerable groups have an environment that is not disturbed by dogs.

In a community, in a building, it is impossible to keep a dog without disturbing others. Dogs are friends of their owners, not of everyone, and the harm they do to people around them can never be eliminated. If you want harmony, you have to ban dogs.

Of course, banning dogs requires a process, a certain period of time, and a good home for dogs.

Both foreign and domestic rural families have independent living spaces, which have little interference and harm to others. The cost of keeping a dog abroad is very high. Once the people are disturbed, the price that civilians can't bear. We live in the same neighborhood and building. Everyone should consider the interests of neighbors and others. We can't be selfish, and we can't take advantage of the law. Our laws are gradually improving. We cannot call selfish sophistry success or immorality. May harmony always prevail.

Dog owners are mostly powerful groups. They ignore the dissatisfaction and opposition of the surrounding groups and just look for their own fun. All have certain economic strength, and some are very powerful. Even the public security and the police are afraid of three points. Many people can't afford it, and they don't eat meat, chicken and the like. But they give dogs dog food and ham roast chicken every day, and compensate for medical expenses after hurting people. Some even threatened not to give it, causing pain and extra losses that can only be made by themselves. Leading to the intensification of social contradictions. It is urgent to control urban dog damage.