The opening of 1-3 is naturally unacceptable for the Nets looking forward to the new season. Durant and Owen obviously didn't want the team to lose the fourth game so soon, so in this game, they tried their best at both ends of the offense and defense. It's hard to see Owen having such data on the defensive end. He sent three steals and four blocks on the defensive end. Yes, Durant and Owen not only provoked the team to score 76 points on the offensive end, but also jointly sent 5 steals and 5 blocked shots. But it still doesn't help.
Six lone ranger players scored in double figures and Dansis scored 40+ triple figures, which made their offensive firepower not in vain. In contrast, in addition to the double stars, the Nets only scored 10 by O 'Neill and Duke to judge the quality of role players.
After the game, there was a familiar cry, and the "Nash dismissed" repeatedly mentioned since last season was always mentioned. Unfortunately, despite the problems in the Nets, I don't think Nash will be fired, and his position is still stable. Don't talk about off-site factors, just look at on-site factors. At present, the biggest problem of the Nets is that the offensive and defensive ends are not systematic. The offensive end depends entirely on Durant and Owen's singles ability, and the defensive end is useless.
Among them, the problem of lineup should account for a large part. Nets' lineup not only lacks high-level inside defensive players, but also lacks excellent outside defensive players. The overall height is short and the antagonism is insufficient. The scene on the field is clear at a glance. Dansis chased Mills and others with the ball, but there are still many players in the Nets who can be targeted, which affects the defensive efficiency.
The problem of the offensive end is also the problem of the Nets. Today, we will discuss it from another angle, that is, how helpful is the score of the double star to the team? After five games, Owen ranked second in the league in average playing time and Durant ranked eleventh in the league. There is also a data, team usage. Durant's utilization rate is 33.7%, and Owen's utilization rate is 3 1.6%, both of which rank in the top ten in the league.
The problem is that they are not great organizers, and they don't have enough ability to change their defense. Using a lot of ball rights, the two teamed up to send 8.4 assists and 5.8 mistakes. The attack of the two men is mainly solved by singles, mainly singles, and it is impossible to connect teammates. Similar offensive styles take up too many balls. How many choices are there? I'm not speaking for Nash. There are many problems in his coaching level and on-the-spot command, but with the current configuration of the Nets, there are not many coaches who can get immediate results. By the way, if you lose, you will inevitably scold Simmons. Is he really useless? At the beginning of the game, Simmons had a strong offensive desire, but the effect was not good.
After the confrontation, he always subconsciously dodged, which made him unable to play. Compared with his rusty body, I think the mental problem of his back injury is the most influential. Now Simmons seems to be afraid of getting hurt again, so he is finally inefficient and unwilling to attack. If the psychological problem can't be solved, then his problem is not easy to solve. In addition, Simmons needs to control the ball, and he is more suitable to use his height to form a dislocation advantage at 1, but at present, the Nets can only let him play without the ball and will be overwhelmed by overwhelming criticism.