Due to the widening differences between the United States and Turkey in military strategy, Turkey and NATO led by the United States almost lost all coordination in strategic decision-making, and Macron was even asked whether it was still correct. Collective defense? When the terms are still credible, frankly? I don't know (is it useful)? . The birth of NATO began at the Yalta Conference before the end of World War II. At that time, the Soviet Union took the lead in establishing its sphere of influence in Eastern Europe after the war, which indirectly gave birth to the formation of NATO in countries west of this border.
1949, the United States, Britain and France called for the formation of a military alliance to prevent the Soviet Union from invading the West. A democratic and free world? . Article 5 of NATO clearly stipulates that when any NATO party is attacked by force, it is equivalent to an attack on all contracting parties. It can be said that early France has just stepped out of the shadow of war and its dependence on NATO, a military alliance, is still very high. However, with the decline of the Soviet Union and Russia, France has become increasingly distrustful of NATO, and the differences of interests and fragile trust between countries have gradually emerged.
Therefore, everything must have an end. Without the containment of the Soviet Union, NATO has lost its goals when it was founded. After the end of the cold war, NATO's first military action fell into a disagreement on whether to intervene in Yugoslavia by force. In 2003, Britain and the United States invaded Iraq directly because of false accusations, and European countries' support for the United States began to split gradually, especially France and Germany.
Today, apart from the United States, Britain is the only country in NATO that maintains a strategic agreement on whether to launch a military strike against Iran. France and Germany disapprove of Trump's military actions. The core members of the transatlantic alliance are inseparable, and NATO seems to have little need to exist. 20 17 After Trump entered the White House, the contradictions and discord within NATO were officially put on the table. Trump not only publicly questioned? Collective defense? At the same time, it is putting pressure on NATO allies to increase the proportion of defense budget to meet the threshold of NATO requirements, especially France and Germany.
On the Iranian nuclear issue, Trump insisted on withdrawing from the JCPOA promoted by Germany and France, which forced the two countries to find another channel to help Iran export oil, and tried to evade US economic sanctions by using a settlement mechanism other than the US dollar.
At the same time, Macron believes that Europe is standing in? Unless you start acting like a geopolitical power, you will no longer be able to control your own destiny. To this end, Europe should regain its military sovereignty and continue to maintain dialogue with Moscow, instead of already? Ideologically divorced from NATO? The United States has firmly controlled and lost the initiative.
Macron has been pushing the EU and western countries to change their roles in the world to adapt to the new global situation. 2065438+August 2009, he said that western hegemony had ended and it would be a mistake to try to isolate Russia. Europe should deepen its cooperation with Russia, instead of going further and further on the wrong road under the temptation of the United States.