Although the boss of the company thinks that employees should contribute voluntarily, the voluntary letter is also signed voluntarily, and only the right people should sign it. But it makes people think very carefully. If a company advocates this way of working, do you dare not follow it as an employee? There are only two outcomes, either you accept and sign the voluntary application form of the struggler, then work hard and give up all legitimate rights and interests.
Although you keep your job, when the company wants to fire you because your ability can't keep up, you can only leave, because you have promised in the letter of commitment that you have accepted all this unconditionally. Even if you leave, there will be no legal dispute with the company because of this. Either you bravely refuse, then you can't stay in this working environment, and then you leave actively or passively. In short, the enterprise only keeps the people he wants to stay. After several rounds of selection, the final ones are naturally people who are willing to struggle.
This makes people even more puzzled. Will some workers voluntarily give up their legitimate rights and interests, and then take the company as their home and pay unconditionally? I don't think it's possible. After all, the company has no employee equity, and the employee is just a person who gets a monthly salary or an annual salary. What makes them confident to sign such an agreement? The word voluntary seems that the company can neatly shirk all responsibilities. If employees voluntarily give up buying social security, can voluntariness be a shield for breaking the law? Obviously impossible. In my personal opinion, if I meet such a company, do I have to work overtime during the New Year?