Q: In today's society, exam-oriented education has reached its peak, and people with extensive knowledge are needed. Therefore, students of Tsinghua Peking University can always find jobs more easily. Do they have good personalities? Are the students in our higher vocational colleges having bad personalities? Although our knowledge is not as good as others, will we lose compared with our personality? Refutation: But what's the use of high personality? What this society needs is knowledgeable people. What the boss values first is your knowledge, not your personality. Both seem to be very important, but the topic is that the fundamental task of education in China is to cultivate high-quality laborers, professionals and a large number of top-notch innovative talents, that is, to cultivate people with all-round development in morality, intelligence, physique and beauty, and to continuously enhance the social competitiveness of Chinese college students. Relatively speaking, as long as you learn this knowledge thoroughly at school, your personality will not be much lower. Q: Now the school is carrying out ideological and moral training courses. Refutation: Don't you need knowledge to cultivate ideological and moral concepts? What is knowledge, besides specialized courses? I also ask you, without psychological knowledge, what do you want to use? Is there no order? Good character is just sitting there? What is a good character, and where does the criterion of judgment come from? Don't you need knowledge to judge? Can the personality molded in the university withstand the impact of entering the society? Personality without rational theoretical support of one's own mind is unstable and fragile. If personality cultivation is more important, how do you show that personality cultivation is more important and spend more time? How to cultivate? What is the actual action? Read ideological and moral books? Help the old lady cross the street? How many people can you help in a day? Refute: disagree with the other party's point of view. Can you tell a person's knowledge? Once you have knowledge, will he still run? Personality is changeable. In a person's life, good can be turned into evil, and evil can also be turned into good. Personality building was not built in a day. He needs a lifetime of hard work, and college is the best opportunity for people to accumulate knowledge. Don't waste time. Q: Many people say that morality is very important to Liu Haiyang and Ma Jiajue, so I would like to ask where your morality comes from. Refutation: Did it take four years to train in college? So does the other party think that people who have never been to college are morally low? As we all know, our character begins when we babble. There are more than one million students in universities in China, and Liu Haiyang and Ma Jiajue are just two of them. Do we think the world should be covered by dots? This is really knowing one thing and not knowing the other. He just has too little knowledge of psychological adjustment. Don't you want such people to accumulate knowledge and shape their personality with air? "I want to ask, what's the use of having strong psychological knowledge without better thinking and application? There is not enough knowledge accumulation, so there is tragedy. Pay attention to the accumulation of knowledge and realize the sublimation of personality. Only qualitative change can change, and quantitative change can have personality. Don't put knowledge on the back burner. So knowledge is the foundation and he is the key, so the accumulation of knowledge is more important. The topic of our debate today is not how to accumulate knowledge, but which is more important, knowledge accumulation or personality shaping. Q: Some people say that personality is the foundation of knowledge, which is all wet. Without knowledge as the basis, how can one distinguish right from wrong? Refutation: The ancients have long said: Why study? It's nothing more than a black and white distinction between right and wrong. If no one tells a child that it is wrong to take other people's things without others' permission, then we can imagine what this child will look like in the future ... Q: Corrupt officials say that corrupt officials refute: Then I want to ask these people that they passed many moral tests before becoming officials. Are they morally deficient? Definitely not. In addition, we invite each other to debate a question. We discussed these problems in college. What will happen when you become an official? Please don't digress after graduation. Q: Many people who have gone abroad never come back. Is going abroad a moral issue? Refutation: going abroad is a big problem for most people, but Einstein went abroad. Can you say that his morality is low? So what is your main task as a student in these four years? How can one talk about morality if one forgets all his tasks? If college students don't pick up all the ways to graduate from various universities, they only have a half-knowledge of what their professional knowledge is. Take how the country develops, how the world progresses, and how mankind progresses. Q: Some people say that high-tech crime refutes: Then, how do you explain why the life direction of high-tech crime is crooked? Because the accumulated knowledge of ideological education is not enough! Reading the Analects of Confucius every day will whip your conscience and sublimate your thoughts. Q: The purpose and mission of the university. Refutation: The purpose of a university is to rejuvenate the country through science and education, and science and technology are the primary productive forces. If the main function of universities is to shape their personalities, there is absolutely no need for them to come to universities again. What is the purpose of our coming to the university? It's learning! What is learning? The accumulation of knowledge. Is it okay for the opposing party to argue with friends and classmates at home and shape their character? Can you learn professional knowledge at home and at school? First of all, I want to say that I don't deny that college students shape their own personality. What we say today is more important just because our technology can't keep up. As China's future successors, we have no reason not to study hard and try to master knowledge to compare with others, so I think we should study more and master knowledge. Since the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has put forward the strategy of strengthening the country through talents, which is a century-long plan and education-oriented. Refutation: The fundamental task of education is to cultivate high-quality workers, specialized talents and a large number of top-notch innovative talents, that is, to cultivate people with all-round development in morality, intelligence, physique and beauty, and constantly enhance the social competitiveness of college students. The party's educational policy: colleges and universities are required to adhere to education to serve the socialist modernization and the people, and to combine it with productive labor and social practice to cultivate high-quality builders and successors. In the process of cultivating talents, everything in the school is for the growth and development of students. At present, the competition among colleges and universities is also the competition of talent cultivation, which is reflected in the social competitiveness of talents cultivated in colleges and universities. Q: How to gain a foothold in society: For a school, the most important thing is the students, while for a student, the most important thing to improve their social competitiveness is the knowledge of professional courses. If a person doesn't even master the most basic things, how can he gain a foothold in society? Take our present society for example, every job has specific requirements. And most units will fill in the most basic requirements: * * education or above. This shows the importance of a person's professional knowledge to a person in the face of social competition, that is to say, knowledge learning is the most basic and important task for college students. Q: Character determines a person's fate: it's a cliche, but it's true. From my personal experience, I can know that a person's success depends on his personality, what kind of person he is and what kind of person he wants to be. Not by the remaining 10% expertise. Refutation: There used to be many people who had to give up because they didn't have enough professional knowledge and competence when the opportunity came. Q: Sima Guang has a saying in Zi Zhi Tong Jian that talent, virtue and talent are also handsome. Isn't handsome the commander in chief? Isn't commander-in-chief more important? ? Refutation: The meaning of personality in Modern Chinese Dictionary includes ability, which is different from knowledge. This is the purpose of knowledge. No one studies knowledge for the sake of learning knowledge! ! ! Virtue is like soldiers in the army, and the commander-in-chief soldiers are the foundation of the army, so the commander-in-chief organizes many of these soldiers to form combat effectiveness. A commander-in-chief can lead thousands of troops, but he can't replace thousands of troops. If a single soldier is compared with the commander-in-chief, perhaps the commander-in-chief is more important, but what Sima Qian said in that sentence should be assembly, which is more important than the soldiers of the whole army. Besides, he doesn't focus on which side, because such a question is difficult to balance the results, in fact. Q: The traitor retorted: So I think as a college student, we should pay more attention to the accumulation of knowledge, including science and technology, literature and art, and so on. Personality is generally based on certain knowledge, although it is special, but after all, most of them are. At the end of the Qing Dynasty, citizens were honest, though not noble. What was the result? Not enslaved by foreigners? What is the reason for it? There are so many traitors in War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression because there is no science and technology. I think a large part of the reason is that China's knowledge level is too low, which leads to his low quality. Most of them don't know what patriotism is. For example, the United States attacked Iraq because the country was poor and its knowledge level was not high enough. During the war, poor Iraq didn't even have enough to eat and had a hard life. What kind of personality is it? Learning all kinds of knowledge is to cultivate sentiment, improve quality and improve their personality. The relationship between the two should be that we should keep learning knowledge because we don't want to improve our personality. But from the perspective of laying eggs and laying eggs, if the formation of personality is not innate but acquired, then accumulating knowledge is more important than shaping personality. Without the accumulation of knowledge, the shaping of personality is impossible. The process of choosing and accumulating knowledge correctly is the process of shaping personality. When personality deviates from knowledge, it is usually because of improper choice of knowledge. Therefore, the key is whether you can choose knowledge correctly in the process of accumulating knowledge. If you choose the right one, your personality will not deviate. There is nothing wrong with knowledge, but the problem lies in choosing the system of knowledge structure. In addition, the specific direction of the word "personality" needs to be clear. There is something wrong with the idea of "shaping personality". What kind of personality is it? Good character or bad character? Is personality the psychological meaning of personality or the moral meaning of personality? The formation of a good personality requires the accumulation of knowledge. How do you know what a good personality is without knowledge? I don't think your personality knows anything. Take your own country as an example. You have been bullied by other countries for hundreds of years. What do you think this is? It's not just a lack of knowledge and technology. At that time, did you have a useful personality? I just stepped on your foot, so my point is that knowledge is more important than character. Q: The educational purpose of people. Refutation: It is to know more clearly, get closer to the truth, and at the same time strengthen your ability to control yourself, cultivate yourself, know the world and transform the world. The task of higher education is to cultivate senior professionals with innovative spirit and practical ability, develop science, technology and culture, and promote socialist modernization. Whether college students should focus on accumulating knowledge or shaping personality is to see which is more in line with the purpose of education and which is more in line with the task of higher education. Personality refers to a person's moral quality, which is a person's temperament, ability and character. Personality refers to a person's moral quality, which is the sum of his temperament, ability and personality. Obviously, the shaping of personality is based on knowledge accumulation. In the current education, students' physical and mental, academic and personality development is not coordinated enough, which has complicated reasons. But as far as education itself is concerned, it largely stems from the failure to effectively and scientifically coordinate the deep-seated contradictions among students' body and mind, studies and personality. In education, the development goal is to simply improve students' academic level at the expense of their physical and mental health and personality perfection intentionally or unintentionally; Or it is not an individual phenomenon to unilaterally understand the success or failure of students' learning as the only content and the highest standard of students' development. Q: Evaluating students by scores: We are talking about knowledge accumulation now, and the opposing debater has confused the concepts of knowledge accumulation and scores. Q: The crime rate of graduates, doctoral students and other highly educated people is higher than that of ordinary graduates, because they pay too much attention to academic qualifications and knowledge and neglect the education of personality and moral quality, which leads to high-tech crimes! Refutation: So I want to ask whether the crimes committed by many knowledgeable people are the fault of personality or the fault of law, which leads to social intolerance. Q: In schools that "learn to survive" and "learn to be a man", everyone sees similar slogans: "Learn to be a man, learn to live, learn to learn, and learn to develop." ; Refutation: The educational slogan put forward by the United Nations for the 2 1 century is "Learn to be a man". In China, "learn to be a man" is translated as "learn to be a man". As for "being a man", in Chinese, "being a man" has only two meanings: one is to treat people and things; The second is to be a decent person. People must live in social groups. People who don't know how to be human are really hard to "survive". It can be seen that "being a man" is simply confused with "survival". Q: How is personality formed? How to shape it? Refutation: The system of personality is very huge, including three systems. It contains the characteristics of control, tendency and psychology. The psychological characteristics mentioned to us include personality, ability, temperament and so on. There is a saying in children's proverbs: "Look at the old at the age of three, look at the old at the age of seven", which is a very representative sentence summed up by ordinary people in real life, but this sentence just reflects the important stage of people's childhood to their personality growth. How are big universities shaped? Q: The way children are educated refutes that we give children love, which is actually to make them develop healthily, rather than simply protecting and loving them. For example, when we saw the child fall, parents rushed to see if it was broken. Does it hurt? Wait a minute. It is also a bad thing that children lack freedom under the protection of so many people. Therefore, it is necessary for us to grasp the degree and quantity of this protection, when it appears and how we treat it. Some parents take good care of their children. When children do something, they always remind them to pay attention to this and that, don't get their clothes dirty, don't break things and so on. We can see that the formation of personality is related to our subjective wishes, our educational attitude and some inaccuracies in our educational methods. Of course, the formation of personality is not only these aspects, but also many other aspects. Q: Knowledge is the first purpose of going to college. Refutation: after we went to college, we were assigned to various departments and majors according to the different employment direction and courses we studied. However, due to their different temperament types and achievements, they were not assigned to different choleric and sanguine majors. When we come to the university, because of the accumulation of knowledge, we must get credits before we can graduate. As for personality, the school thinks that most students have no problem. If they have problems, they will stay at school for inspection. Of course, when a student has both ability and political integrity, the school will encourage him with scholarships. However, the proportion of intellectual education in most schools greatly exceeds that of moral education. First of all, who is more important, knowledge or personality? Secondly, I think that a person's knowledge accumulation determines his level and almost his future career development, and the university stage is a crucial period for a person to form his own knowledge system, which must not be delayed. In contrast, the function of university in shaping personality is relatively secondary. Finally, I also think that the forming factors of personality are extremely complicated, and the role played by the university environment is limited and not decisive. Generally speaking, a person's personality has been stereotyped at the age of 20, and it doesn't make much difference at university. Are there many people who have changed greatly in these four or five years? University is a very relaxing time, you can determine your interests and learn what you like, whether it is professional or non-professional, books or real life, which will be of great use in the future. Personality is more plastic when I was a child. If it had been stereotyped at that time, it would be difficult to change it when you get to college. Q: The definition of "university" retorts that it means learning more things-these things mainly refer to professional knowledge, which requires us to study at a deeper level and serve the society in the future; The bounden duty of students is learning, and learning is mainly aimed at knowledge accumulation. Our parents and teachers have been educating us about educational knowledge and personality since childhood. University is nothing more than the cultivation and shaping of personality, and the shaping of personality is what a person needs from childhood to adulthood, which does not mean that universities must pay attention to shaping. Maybe when a person is very young, his personality will be shaped and almost finished. But the further study and accumulation of knowledge is undoubtedly in the university! ! ! Although it is never too old to learn, the most important stage of learning is to accumulate knowledge in college (including self-study ability, book knowledge, practical ability, communicative ability and so on). ), thus building the cornerstone of self-stepping into society. Because the title emphasizes the relationship between the two in the university and highlights the word' Geng', which is undoubtedly the accumulation of knowledge for college students. (Excluding special cases: it means that the personality is very bad and needs to be shaped urgently, otherwise it is the other party's point of view: "The higher the education, the more dangerous it is." Special is not suitable for universal, so we must grasp the main population. Personality shaping is the ultimate goal of life. All efforts in life are aimed at shaping a personality with distinctive personal characteristics. As far as the importance of accumulating knowledge and shaping personality is concerned, it is not at the same level. But as a college student, in such a specific time area as four years of college, I think the accumulation of knowledge is more important than the shaping of personality. Personality shaping runs through a person's life, and the result can't be decided in a certain period of time. Even I think that the previous 20 years of college life played a decisive role in shaping personality. Isn't there an old saying "Look at the old at the age of three", but four years of study in college is a golden age that can't be copied on the road of life. If you miss it, you miss it. The pressure of work and family after graduation makes the purpose and environment of study less relaxed than that of college. The cruelty of the objective social environment determines the importance of knowledge. Without knowledge, you cannot make a living. You can't support your family without knowledge; You can't serve your country without knowledge, so how can you talk about shaping your personality when you can't make a living, support your family and run your country? The goal without means can only be a castle in the air. Theoretically, it is necessary to carry out key personality and moral education in primary and secondary schools, and the knowledge system foundation is sufficient, but in-depth study and research are needed in universities. Then, in the current education, primary and secondary school students work overtime for seven days a week in order not to know how much knowledge they can use in the future, but ideological education is very lacking. That you came to college to make up lessons. It is most important to accumulate knowledge in college. But I'm talking more about "experience". You can't learn much just by relying on those two outdated textbooks. As for personality, if you take a class in kindergarten and do as the teacher says, your personality will not be so bad. It is said that many people's habits are actually formed by their parents and the atmosphere of the whole social era, and then childhood. When I went to college, I tried to cultivate my personality through edification. It seems that great efforts have been made but little effect has been achieved, and even counterproductive. It is still too early to say, because most college students have no experience in society and don't know how to properly handle all kinds of complicated interests. Since we don't know the stakes, pure education is probably like the autumn wind, which is meaningless to them. Q: The definition of knowledge accumulation is refuted: knowledge accumulation refers to the combination of current thinking and text. No matter what major, it is not feasible to leave society and human beings. This goes against the original intention of the university, and we firmly oppose it.