Because everyone has a truth, it doesn't need much money anyway, and it's natural to waste it if you don't eat it for free. There are many examples, such as toilet paper in public toilets, shopping bags in supermarkets, being taken home as garbage bags and so on. As long as it is not your own thing, the reasons behind it should be investigated, which are all problems left over from history.
First of all, all the problems in our country can be summed up in a well-understood "relatively large population base"! As the saying goes, it is not enough, so a series of contradictions caused by the real problem of relatively large population base can be attributed to "the finiteness of resources and the infinity of human needs" The material living standard has improved a lot, and the problem of food and clothing has been basically solved, but other needs have come again. It stands to reason that no one can afford toilet paper or garbage bags, and similar bicycle enjoyment is destroyed or misappropriated. On the one hand, users feel that someone is using it. To put it bluntly, I think people can use it, but I don't need it, which is a loss.
Secondly, the family education background and legal awareness are not perfect. When destroying, occupying or even selling bicycles or other public resources, they don't realize that this is a violation, and they don't think that they may be sentenced for such practices. The grassroots legal awareness is weak. This problem is also related to the promulgation of our laws and regulations and the popularization of education. China's laws are backward, and there may be no legal provisions to clearly define the nature of the problem and the solution for many years. The so-called four links of "laws to follow, laws to be observed, strict law enforcement and offenders to be prosecuted" are still stuck in the slogan and have not been put into place.
Thirdly, the characteristics of user groups restrict * * * to enjoy bicycles, while others * * * enjoy charging treasures, umbrellas and other items in the subway. Their user groups basically belong to the current low-middle level, and the equality advocated by everyone has quietly divided people into three or six classes in the social reality of money first. The investment level of subway riders and riders is not high.
As you can imagine, people who earn more than10 million basically have their own means of transportation, and they don't need to ride bicycles or take the subway. Don't say that they won't go even if they are given money for free. This is because people from different classes have different needs. There was another car accident on the highway. Someone robbed the driver of the overturned car, and the police could do nothing when they arrived at the scene. The root cause of this incident is that anything that can be taken back to their home is an improvement for them.
Finally, the design defects of * * * enjoy bicycles have mentioned so many subjective reasons for the low quality of users, and we have to mention the defects of * * * enjoy bicycles. For example, some bicycles only have an unlocking code, and the bicycle lock is easy to be cracked, which also facilitates the implementation actions provided by those who want to take advantage of small things. If we can improve the design to make up for these problems, I think we can also reduce a considerable number of uncivilized behaviors.