Current location - Quotes Website - Team slogan - Leveling of inspirational couplets
Leveling of inspirational couplets
Use couplets? Pingyi? Judging from reading newspapers and magazines, the debate is getting more and more intense. I want to talk about someone? Head up? , and ask Fang Jia.

? Pingyi? The situation of

Ping, is it a couplet genre? Six elements? One, at least? Do you want to talk about level and level? . The so-called use? Today? Or? Ancient sound? System (as long as you don't mix them together), does that explain it? Must couplets be boring? . If you ask the reason, simply answer: What are couplets? Metric literature? One kind. All registration notices, large and small, emphasize that the application must meet the requirements? Joint method? , does not rule out flat. These are all for you? Pingyi? There is a suitable position. As for whether every United family admits it? Couplets are metrical literature? Don't draw an equal sign. But did you say it? Rhythm is just a kind of? Couplet skills? There are many skills in couplets. Not every couplet is used, is it? Flat feet? Is it okay? Stop talking? Even lines are dispensable in couplets.

How to use level tones in couplets?

This problem, on the whole, cannot solve the problem. I summed up that there are three systems of couplets, which should be treated separately:

1. What is the dual metrical type of metrical poetry? Be sure to get to the bottom of it and avoid three flat heads, embarrassing sentences and loneliness. Save? . But it is also limited to five-word or seven-word sentences. As for the three-character, four-character, six-character short couplet (or short sentences in long couplet) that cut forward at the end of the seven-character sentence, we can focus on the level of confrontation. However, not all five-word or seven-word sentences are rhythmic. What else is there? Three two two? Or? Two, three, two and so on, this will be judged, and it is forbidden to confuse things. Rhyme is a double meter with a fixed format.

Second, the duality of metrical non-metrical poems? Also called? Joint law type? Yes, it has no unchangeable format to imitate. Generally, it contains two connotations: ① semantic units (i.e. phrases, phrases and nouns) in sentences, three words that break through disyllables (including disyllables) and have four or more unsynchronized orders (rhythm points). What should be strictly done when creating? In a sentence, the steps should alternate and the steps between sentences should be opposite? ; Relax a little, the steps inside and between sentences can't be considered flat, and the foot of the sentence must be considered flat. If you try to press the foot of the sentence? Horseshoe plaid? It is superior. This kind of couplet includes? Rhyme, word splitting? And other related rhetorical forms? Even tired of this sentence? The accepted metrical form in ancient and modern times. For example:

Lin Xiangru and Sima Xiangru with similar names are not;

Wei Wuji, Sun Chang mowgli, you mowgli, I mowgli.

Sit down, sit down, sit down;

Tea, tea, tea.

Lack of understanding? Couplet skills? People say:? Should such couplets go to hell according to the rigid requirement of alternate leveling?

Third, wide pair type? Here, it's just flat. Except for the end, the steps and feet of the sentence are not flat, or even the words can reach several words, almost like spoken language, to express? Syntax, sentence pattern (rhythm)? Give priority to confrontation, form? Parallel body, right . Because the parallel body developed from four parallel couples, it was not accepted early. Words? Constraints (see augmented scholars and you xueqiong Lin, etc. ). For example:

Development is the last word;

Honesty is a good style.

The wave of reform/setting off/China characteristics;

Dongfanghong/Arouse/Rebirth of China People.

Like what? Honesty is a good style? Full of slogans!

Three couplets, on a level playing field? Yan Kuan? Each has its own requirements and cannot be confused. As the creation of a United family, you can choose your own hobbies. In this case, there is no need to eliminate one and promote the other, and there is no need to estimate the future. But who has the advantage? Except? Artistic conception? This premise, the special features of creative methods, correct methods, rhetorical skills, etc. (for example, collecting sentences, discussing right, some fake right? ), I am afraid it is an important identification factor. ? Wide right? Besides oral English, what is its creative art? Face? It is bound to be compressed a lot, which is worth pondering.

From where? Flat feet? Talk about it.

Since the request is made, why don't you talk about couplets? Flat feet? At least learn to know the right person? The text is plain? . After knowing the level of words, it is limited to use? Articulated feet? Although the steps and feet of the sentence are cancelled, isn't it still? Bound? . Because some theories mention it? Is it a shackle? It's just that the degree difference between more and less is actually contradictory. Of course I should admit it, okay? Small constraints? With what? Big constraint? There is no essential difference, but there is? Is it tight? The difference.

? Joint law type? Couplets have long been independent from poetic style and exist independently. How wide is the level? Feet? (or with your feet), no? Loneliness, depression and triple tail? Restrict. For example:

Have/have the courage/* *;

From/without words/reading. (Zhou Enlai)

Dust robbery/over a thousand years, repeating/old ideas, fortunately, there are wise men as teachers;

Poet/Title 28, there are not necessarily many good sentences. (Hanshan Temple Alliance)

At the same time, it is solved from the semantic rhythm? Five stresses and four beauties? 、? Gong Yu moved mountains? Wait for some good length? Words? Join the league? Violate the law? problem If this is still? Hinder popularization? And then what? Affect the development of creation? , that is not as good as? Flat feet? Announce the cancellation and be free. Is there really? Also on whether informal couplets are formal? There is something like this in the article:? Non-phonological association is limited by the silent law. It is easier for lovers who are not familiar with melody and whose creation is blocked. ? I don't think this statement is appropriate, because the common law system has given it? Manufacturing language? Loosen the tie. As for the emphasis on non-acoustic connections? So as to capture inspiration, express feelings, construct artistic conception and shape image? , but also objectively speaking. These aspects do not depend on which format, but on literary accomplishment and artistic attainments. Poetry, for example? When you leave home, the boss will come back, such as Lian? Red plums in the snow report good news; The green willow by the window tells the truth? Both colloquial and elegant. Like a gentleman? Establish a socialist market economic system? Used for knitting, smarter? Slogan? . But couplets are literature, not slogans (there are also couplets in the other two systems? Slogan? Yes, it's generally not as easy to appear as a broad model), and advertising language is just an episode in related styles. This couplet was launched on the 50th anniversary of the National Day. Judging from the number of albums published, it may be regarded as the largest volume in the last decade. Non-tone? The application is not the best, but it has been won? Right to participate? .

Someone suggested? Want to fight for the publishing rights of non-vocal music associations? Not in the newspaper? No? Its decision lies in its realm and artistic value. There is no difference between couplets and whether they are published or not, and there is no need to talk about them. Fight for what? Right? what's up .