What happened was very dramatic. Simply put, the organization wants to short the stock of a company called Game Station, but the game developed by this company has been accompanied by many Americans' childhood, and they are afraid that everyone will take over the stock. However, short-selling institutions ridiculed these retail investors as fools, which angered these retail investors. They shorted institutions on rallies, pushed up stock prices against the trend, and broke positions, causing heavy losses to short institutions. Some people took this opportunity to earn tens of millions with tens of thousands of dollars, attracting more people. Media comments are a great victory for retail investors. As a result of the incident, the organization could not afford to lose, and directly overturned the table and unplugged the network cable to prevent retail investors from buying and selling, causing heavy losses to retail investors and exposing them to the world.
Of course, in the epic event of retail investors defeating institutions, institutions are indispensable to participate in it and join the blow to short-selling institutions. However, it is undeniable that this time it was entirely initiated by retail investors, mainly retail investors, and the participating institutions were friendly forces, supplemented by them. So we can't ignore the contribution of retail investors. Although the final result is bound to be full of participating institutions and most retail investors suffer, this is another matter. Just like the previous peasant uprising, although the fruits of the final victory were usurped, you can't ignore the peasants among them.
Who are the retail investors who beat the institutions?
According to the investigation, they are young people born after 90 s and 00 s who are mixed in an online forum called "Wall Street Casino". They are at the bottom of society, but they dream of getting rich overnight. The slogan is "You can only live once". They like to gamble with small bets and have no investment philosophy. They only buy all the stocks when they fancy them. Like gamblers' stallions, they all win or lose. This style of play is not valued because it loses more and wins less. But no one expected that this time they played a big ticket and set a record.
Why did they become leaders and realize the biggest and strongest desire of retail investors for many years: to defeat institutions! Seriously, with this feat, they are heroes! We can check their background, but they are marginal people in the land of good and evil. They are completely rotten, very different from everyone's heroes, but it must be them. Why?
Maybe we misunderstood them, but they are not as bad as we thought. But a more reasonable explanation is that this role of provoking trouble is more suitable for them to play.
Good people are generally honest, tolerant of injustice, and generally do not resist if they are not in a hurry. It's just that these gangsters are unruly and rebellious. Whenever there is an opportunity to make trouble, it is more common for them to take the lead in making trouble. In social unrest, they are often the first to take action to resist. Like the 19 1 1 year revolution led by Sun Yat-sen, the uprising initially relied on communist party members. The proletarian revolution initially attracted rogue proletarians. * * * The production party engaged in land reform, and the most enthusiastic at the beginning was the rural loafers. Therefore, the success of the revolution depends not on the extremists who come first, but on hard work to mobilize the enthusiasm of the broadest masses of the people.
Which retail investors will be attracted by taking the lead in cracking down on airdrop organizations? There is not enough information in this area to talk nonsense. I think everyone has it under heavy interest! Strangely, are those who support the reliability of red neck among them?