First of all, look at the United States, the attitude is very negative: you developing countries will reduce emissions first, and I, the United States, will not make commitments as the case may be! Developing countries mainly look at China! It is hoped that China will promote energy conservation and emission reduction in developing countries.
Let's look at Japan and other countries: the propaganda is fierce, the bragging is fierce, and the actual work is not necessarily fierce.
Look at Brazil and other developing countries: China is the best developing country in the world. So we followed China, and China reduced its effectiveness, so we followed.
Finally, look at China: In fact, reducing emissions, developing new energy technologies and opening up new energy fields are all aimed at increasing market investment channels and jobs. ...
Then I'll ask two questions.
1. Is climate deterioration due to human behavior?
2. Why do developed countries talk more about energy conservation and emission reduction and do less? More demands, less self-discipline.
Is climate deterioration due to human behavior? My answer is no! Climate warming or cooling has nothing to do with human activities!
In the movie The Day After Tomorrow, the vice president played a negative role. Ironically, what he said was actually my opinion: "Professor, our economy is as fragile as the environment. Please don't scare people easily! "
I discuss my point of view from two points:
The first point: the Climategate event can explain why I doubt any data about so-called climate warming, just as I suspect that the sea level in Tuvalu has risen by 9. 12 cm.
Here I will briefly describe the "Climate Gate". The Copenhagen conference is based on the research results of a company called "University of East Anglia". Before the Copenhagen conference, a Russian hacker stole the contents of thousands of emails between British climatologists, thus spying on the private exchange of ideas between meteorologists in the past decade. Hackers made the email public, claiming that it can be seen from the email that these meteorologists are not serious about their research, and they even tampered with the data that is unfavorable to their research to prove that human activities play a huge role in climate change. In other words, the statement that human activities affect the climate may be lies and deception!
With the outbreak of Climategate, BBC filmed a series of programs and interviewed many famous meteorologists. These meteorologists say that many experts and scholars in Copenhagen have been fooled by politicians. They don't have meteorological knowledge. What's more, some famous meteorologists were "named". (Specifically, you can go to major video websites to search for programs. The BBC is a well-known media, entrusted with responsibility and relatively credible. )
Therefore, it can be seen from this incident that the climate information we have obtained is not serious, and a lot of information is doubtful.
The second point is a completely different scientific basis.
The core of Copenhagen spirit is to emphasize one word, "low carbon", so carbon emissions are considered as the cause of climate problems. So how much carbon do we emit? 6.5 billion tons a year, which includes all human factors such as breathing and driving. Every year, the carbon dioxide produced in the process of bacterial and deciduous decay is about 654.38+05 billion tons, and there are other factors such as volcanic eruption, which form far more carbon dioxide than human activities.
The so-called embankment of a thousand miles was destroyed by an ant nest. Will this 6.5 billion tons of carbon dioxide upset the balance of the earth's climate? I think this is very unlikely.
From the study of ice samples, we can calculate the temperature and carbon content in the atmosphere in different years in history. The results show that there are many ice ages and high temperature periods on the earth, but this is obviously different from the level of carbon dioxide content. Historically, the temperature always reached its peak several centuries after it reached its peak, but after it reached its peak, it gradually became cold.
The researchers concluded that during the high temperature period, due to the gradual increase of temperature, a large amount of carbon dioxide in the ocean was released, resulting in high carbon dioxide content. When the temperature gradually decreases, the release of carbon dioxide gradually stops until it is no longer released, and finally carbon dioxide begins to be "recovered". Therefore, temperature is different from carbon dioxide content, and carbon dioxide content changes slowly with temperature.
So it is concluded from the above that if the information I get is correct, then the climate has nothing to do with carbon dioxide.
If so, why does the climate change from cold to hot? Why are there high temperature periods and ice ages?
The authoritative experts interviewed by BBC think so.
The universe is full of cosmic rays, which originate from supernova explosions and pass through the atmosphere. Because more than 70% of the earth's surface is water, cosmic rays are injected into the ocean in large quantities, which promotes the separation of water molecules and volatilizes into the atmosphere in the form of water vapor, and the water vapor in the atmosphere gathers into clouds.
Clouds formed by water vapor are very good heat preservation gases. Solar radiation will be reflected when it hits the ground. If there is no cloud in Wan Li, it will directly reflect back into the universe. However, if there is a cloud, it will be intercepted by the cloud on the way to lay the reflection, and it will be reflected back to the earth again to play a role in heat preservation.
However, although the "supply" of cosmic rays is stable, there is another factor, and that is the solar wind.
When sunspots erupt, the stronger the solar wind is. The solar wind will blow away cosmic rays near the earth. When there are few cosmic rays, there will be less water vapor in the earth's atmosphere, and the clouds will be thin, and the thin clouds will lack the function of heat preservation, and the earth's climate will become cold.
The eruption of sunspots also has certain rules.
According to the observation of the sun, sunspot activity was not very frequent until 2000, but it has increased in recent years. I don't know if this has anything to do with volcanoes and earthquakes, but don't you think it's a little cold this winter?
According to historical data, from the end of World War II to 1975, the global climate gradually cooled, and then from 1975 to 2000, the climate was warming, but after 2000, especially in recent years, the climate did not continue to warm. Some experts believe that the climate has begun to get colder. (And it can be seen from this data that after World War II, it was an industrial recovery period, and the emission of carbon dioxide would not consider climate factors. As a result, the climate became cold, further indicating that carbon dioxide has nothing to do with climate. )
To sum up, I think the process of climate warming is actually the normal change of the earth's climate. There was a warmer period on earth than now in history, that is, the Middle Ages, when the world society was quite rich, and most famous churches in Europe were built at that time, while in China, it was experiencing the peak of feudal society-Kaiyuan Shi Sheng! In addition, the industrial revolution was a famous ice age in history. At that time, the Thames was frozen, and vendors often set up shop on the ice in winter. I think the change of temperature is as normal as four seasons in a year.
Then why save energy and reduce emissions when the climate is good?
If what I have learned above is correct, it is impossible for a politician to learn what I can. In that case, why is there a slogan of "low carbon"?
In fact, the global climate problem originated in Britain, and the initiator was Margaret Thatcher, the famous first female prime minister in Britain. Because of the acid rain phenomenon in Britain during her campaign, she put forward the campaign slogan of global environmental degradation and protection, which just catered to the psychology of two people. First, after World War II, because of the existence of the atomic bomb, human beings blindly knew that they had great power and thought that they could destroy the earth. The second is the fear of "having great power", which in turn will be destroyed by your own strength. So Thatcher took advantage of this slogan and became the first female prime minister in Britain. This law will be widely used by politicians in various countries in various political and economic fields, especially in the economic field.
The world economy is like a plate of water, and all countries in the world are like a plate of water. If you lay the plate flat, the water content in all parts of the plate is the same. If you hold it unevenly, some parts of the plate will get more water and some parts will get less water. However, the big countries led by the United States hope that the plate can tilt and get more water.
As a result, big countries throw out the just banner of "energy saving, emission reduction, low carbon and environmental protection", shouting this slogan loudly and confidently, taking environmental protection as the commanding height of morality, and making them "take the environment as the emperor and make them disobey me". Anyone who doesn't listen to him can punish you with this, and it can be cruel. Just as Christians punished pagans in the Middle Ages, they can use the stake. You have to understand that reducing carbon dioxide emissions means that for developing countries, output will drop and economic development will slow down. If you slow down, the advantages of developed countries such as the United States will become more obvious. The "water" of the economy will fall on the United States, and the "water" of the United States will naturally increase.
As the biggest victorious country in World War II, the United States successfully carved up the economy after World War II. Its content is that Africa, Asia and South America export raw materials and cheap crude products, and the first and second world countries (North America and Western Europe) led by the United States are responsible for logistics, advertising marketing, design, packaging and retail. The final product is digested by China or re-exported to developing countries. Among them, the profit of rough processing of raw materials export is the lowest, and the profit of logistics, advertising marketing, design, packaging and retail is the most abundant, so the western powers are rich and we are poor. This was carefully planned by the western developed countries headed by the United States.
However, developing countries are not necessarily satisfied with the status quo, and they are all striving for development. But if developing countries develop to the point of destroying the world economic structure planned by western developed countries, the west can no longer tolerate it. They carefully concocted "protecting the world environment", a fat liar who can go down in history! !
In addition, there are more realistic problems. After the American financial crisis, a large number of unemployed people appeared. How to deal with the employment rate is a big problem on Obama's desk. Obama himself is the representative of the blue-collar class, so it is natural to increase workers' jobs. To this end, the United States has made two heavy punches.
The first heavy blow to Japan was the Toyota incident in Japan. By cracking down on Japanese high-end goods such as Toyota, the United States reduced the sales of imported high-end goods, reduced the cost of American goods, and increased the sales and profits of American goods. I don't need to say more about this here. You can find out for yourself.
Second punch, straight to China. Because the increase of industries led by the automobile industry is not enough to meet the employment rate in the United States, nor can it meet Obama's promise to increase 3 million jobs, it is necessary to increase new economic growth points, and the United States has set its goal as a new energy-saving and environmental-friendly industry. However, the United States also wants to ensure that the energy-saving and environmentally-friendly new energy products produced have a market, so the United States has set its goal in China.
First of all, the US feint demands RMB appreciation.
So, what are the benefits of RMB appreciation for the United States? On the surface, this is because the United States is trying to restrict China's exports and make American buyers pay more for cheap goods from China, thus turning their purchasing eyes back to China, so that its own factory will start.
However, this is fatal for China enterprises. As long as the RMB appreciates further by 5-7%, the factories in China will close down, while the United States wants the RMB to appreciate by 30%, which basically means that China enterprises will die.
After that, the United States threatened to label China as a "currency manipulator" and successfully persuaded the European Union to put pressure on China.
However, what the United States has done is not to kill China immediately. His real purpose is to drag China to the negotiating table and increase the bargaining chip.
Sure enough, China really returned to the negotiating table, completely according to the American way of thinking. China and the United States have reached the following understanding.
1, the United States no longer mentions RMB appreciation; 2. The United States is considering recognizing China as a market economy system (clearly, it is considered, and it is not said how long it will be considered); With the contribution of China, the United States "helped" China to build three third-generation nuclear power plants (China already has a safer and more economical fourth-generation nuclear energy product).
Having said that, you should understand that this heavy blow of the United States is actually to find a buyer for American energy-saving and new energy products, and to force others to buy them. The Opium War fought by Britain in order to gain commercial privileges in China was essentially no different.
So my point is that the so-called climate crisis does not exist at all, there is confrontation between countries, and politicians are always dark. This is still a world where the law of the jungle prevails. If there is a climate crisis, it means that the economically developed countries led by the United States create the illusion of climate deterioration to exploit our developing countries. In fact, this society is nominally protecting the environment, but in fact it is destroying the environment. The material used in solar panels is polysilicon, which is very harmful to the environment in the manufacturing process. This is the real source of our environmental crisis. Garbage siege and water pollution are the real culprits that threaten us and nature! Not carbon dioxide.
In order to defend our economy (but not the environment), I suggest that as an ordinary person, what we should do and what we can do to help the country is: under the same conditions, we should try our best to buy domestic goods and spend them in domestic enterprises and businesses, so that people's wealth can stay at home instead of being earned by foreigners. Let our domestic enterprises make more money, so as to give employees more wages. With more wages, they can promote consumption and revitalize China's retail industry, so that China's economy will enter a virtuous circle, so that our economy will be more developed, everyone in China will benefit, and our country will have more confidence in foreign negotiations! ! As for the environment, I only hope that the government can solve the water pollution and garbage siege as soon as possible!