However, this drama let me down again. ...
It's simple. The plot sucks. This is one of them.
Some people say this is made up, don't take it seriously.
I want to say that if you shoot science fiction films, the Milky Way and the universe, it doesn't matter how your brain hole is opened. If you shoot "The Emperor" and Gong Dou, you can also make it up, but you can't shoot a modern military TV series, at least not too outrageous.
This is one of the reasons why modern military TV series is difficult to shoot, but it doesn't mean that it can't be filmed, because there is a military TV series with rave reviews there, and even people who have been soldiers can hardly find the flaws in this drama.
I once repainted it with a critical eye, trying to find even a small plot loophole in this "ceiling" legionary teleplay, but I still couldn't find it.
It's Soldier Assault, which was broadcast in 2006.
It doesn't look like it. This is the second one.
Some people say that this is an actor, not a real soldier.
Of course, I know that they are actors, but since they are playing contemporary soldiers, they should show the strength of a bloody man in a military camp: they walk smoothly, sit like a death knell, speak forcefully, do things resolutely, never answer questions sloppily, and never stoop when standing. ...
For actors, if they want to play a good image of a soldier, they must show the spirit, spiritual core and youthful blood of the soldier, show their grand ideal of serving the country from the army and their growth through tempering.
Look at the growth history of Xu Sanduo. He was surprisingly stupid after joining the army, but he was not liked by the company commander Gao Cheng when he parted ways. But he finally got up after several falls, gritted his teeth and insisted on becoming a qualified iron warrior.
Xu Sanduo's transformation is by no means a personal achievement. Behind him stood a group of real iron soldiers, such as monitor Shi Jin, monitor Ma Lao, vice monitor Wu Liuyi, company commander Gao Cheng, battalion commander July, and so on. This gives the audience the impression that it is not the success of one person, but the image of a tall hero group.
So "Soldier Assault" will become a permanent classic.
Unlike the barracks, this is the third one.
Some fans are easily moved by their idols, so when they see the flat head, an actor who is a soldier, in the trumpet in place, they begin to shout: Too dedicated! Too distressed!
This is also called dedication? Don't actors ignore the flat head and leave a traitor? Or dye your hair red, orange, yellow, green, blue and purple?
Also, I strongly object to modern legionary teleplay inserting love scenes, which is just a gimmick made up to attract young people's attention. In fact, most of the military camps with hundreds of thousands of people simply can't see female soldiers.
In other words, it is as real as the barracks in Soldier Assault, because most female soldiers are engaged in civilian, technical and medical work, and the proportion in the army is extremely low and most of them are concentrated in large and medium-sized cities.
Of course, men and women are forbidden to fall in love in the army. 65438-0993 When I was in the military academy, it was also forbidden for boys and girls to fall in love. I wonder if dating is allowed in military schools now?
So when you see modern legionary teleplay forcibly inserting love scenes, it is basically a fabricated sign. The army does have two military families, but the probability is slim. If you really believe that you can still have a vigorous love after joining the army, then you are finished.
I carefully watched the first episode of Trumpet in Place, but found that there were too many illogical parts in the plot, which exposed the problems of pediatrics and the problem-solving like a child's play, and it was really impossible to arouse the desire to continue watching the play.
Some people say that you just watched the first episode and jumped to conclusions about whether to spray, but I think the importance of the first episode is self-evident. Maybe the amateur audience will think it's a good shot. In fact, the plot of the first episode is ridiculous.
In order to highlight the importance of college students joining the army next, the first plot of the play is that two missile launch vehicles conduct launch drills, which are directly commanded by the brigade commander of the 270 th Brigade. Unexpectedly, something went wrong before launch.
Personally, in order to reflect the importance of college students' soldiers, we can use more ingenious plot design instead of belittling grassroots soldiers, but in the play, we use such a blunt contrast to show the unprofessional frontline soldiers in missile launch.
As a result, the brigade commander who was originally the commander-in-chief in the command hall dropped his walkie-talkie and quickly took the bus to the missile launching position to remove obstacles. As a result, he arrived only after a few words and successfully removed obstacles.
First, the brigade commander did not operate it himself. Why doesn't he direct troubleshooting on the intercom? Do you still have to go to the front line to command?
Second, the brigade commander shall have a deputy brigade commander, a chief of staff and operational staff in charge of the headquarters, and a professional officer in charge of the missile launch battalion commander, company commander and platoon leader. Is it only the brigade commander who will check the whole brigade?
Third, as a highly technical missile launching brigade, the brigade commander's duty is actually to be responsible for training and management, and the technical work is undertaken by specialized technical backbones. This is two different division of responsibilities.
However, in order to reflect the realistic requirements urgently needed by college soldiers, in the plot design, a brigade leader was dragged to the front to remove obstacles, indicating that a large number of officers and technicians were working in vain in disguise.
Also, the first training and mobilization of college students' soldiers after joining the army should have been done by political cadres such as instructors and instructors of Xinbinglian, but unexpectedly it became the work of this brigade commander.
People who have never been a soldier will definitely say that it is not very important for the brigade commander to speak in person. That's bullshit! Is it time for the general to mobilize new recruits?
The brigade commander is a deputy division-level cadre and a senior colonel. In addition, there are battalion, company and platoon organizational units under the brigade organizational system. If the brigade commander is allowed to do this, what are the battalion commander, instructor and company commander?
If you have seen Soldier Assault, you will remember that a soldier rarely has a chance to meet the head of the regiment, let alone the brigade commander or the division commander. In fact, most soldiers have no chance to meet leaders at or above the regiment level before they leave the army.
1996, a nostalgic and sad song "My Old Monitor" spread all over the military camp, making tens of millions of veterans cry while singing, because there is always an old monitor worth remembering in every soldier's heart.
If a recruit doesn't know the rules in the queue, it's understandable, but no recruit will ever ask such a question, even a soldier who plays "super brain" will not be so sharp-edged.
Well, we can believe that there is a soldier like Xia Zhuo, but the squad leader began to reprimand Xia Zhuo in the queue, and he also twisted his head to reprimand him. So why is there such an obvious violation of the queue rules in the plot?
The monitor has always been called "the mother of the army". Most of the squad leaders in the barracks, like Shi Jin, the squad leader in Soldier Assault, patiently inculcate soldiers when they make mistakes, instead of swearing with their mouths open.
"Xia Zhuo, you are crazy!"
"Xia Zhuo, I will kill you, really!"
"Xia Zhuo, you are sick!"
"Xia Zhuo, you did the whole journey!"
Perhaps the times have changed, and now the squad leader in the barracks has also kept pace with the times, which is why he said such a "rogue" to the recruits and even a little "rogue". Is this what the monitor should teach?
Absolutely not! This way of speaking should not appear on the squad leader who is responsible for educating new recruits. The words "Are you crazy", "Are you sick" and "Kill you" seem to be "social people", which sounds with strong personality language expression, but they deviate from the tall image of a monitor.
The reason why I said in the title that "officials are not like officials, and soldiers are not like soldiers" is because the squad leader is out of line when he speaks, and there is another way to speak directly to the brigade commander's office.
In fact, don't say that a squad leader has no chance to report directly to the brigade commander's office, even a platoon leader or company commander basically has no chance, because there are battalion commanders and instructors, as well as leaders at all levels of the headquarters, political department and organs.
This is not to say that the brigade commander is aloof and unattainable, but is determined by the strict concept of superiors and subordinates, the concept of hierarchy, and the sense of command that orders are forbidden. If a soldier reports directly to the head of the regiment and a squad leader reports directly to the division commander, something will go wrong with this unit.
Xia Zhuo, the squad leader, not only directly reported to the brigade commander over the four-level leader, but also repeatedly asked the brigade commander to transfer Xia Zhuo to another class. When the brigade commander asked him why, the monitor began to be glib again:
"The steamer in our class is too small, and Xia Zhuo's steamed buns are thin and stuffed, so they can't be steamed."
What I want to tell the audience is that this is a disciplined team, not chatting in the streets, not standing on the stage and telling jokes.
More importantly, the squad leader backed out when he encountered some difficulties, and even wanted the brigade commander to take Xia Zhuo to another class. This is to regard the military camp as a vegetable market that can be choosy.
Let's look back and think about the practice of squad leader Shi Jin, squad leader Ma Lao, vice squad leader Wu Liuyi and other squad leaders who always adhered to the concept of "don't abandon, don't give up" in soldiers' assault, leaving a high image for the audience.
When I was a soldier, if a squad leader dared to ask the company commander to "change soldiers", he would be scolded and even give the squad leader a serious negative evaluation: his ability was average and useless.
Therefore, it is very inappropriate for such a bad plot to appear in legionary teleplay. The key is that the plot is seriously divorced from reality. Where is such a squad leader like a "military mother"?
The second plot of the play is that the brigade commander gives a mobilization speech to the recruits, during which the performance of "Trumpeter in Place" is arranged. Unexpectedly, Xia Zhuo raised a question on the spot.
This kind of performance is a waste of time for beauty. Don't turn right angles when the trumpeter runs in place, take a shortcut and save a few seconds, which is more in line with the actual needs.
For those who have never been a soldier, they will certainly applaud Xia Zhuo for daring to "speak frankly", and think that the "trumpeter in place" with performance nature is a show and formalism, and this "putting on airs" is not conducive to actual combat.
How to refute this question will be discussed later.
After the mobilization meeting, the monitor "taught" Xia Zhuo outdoors alone. The squad leader did not educate Xia Zhuo from the perspective of rules and regulations, but thought that Xia Zhuo's public questioning was inappropriate and his ideological work level as a soldier was too low.
The monitor's rhetoric, Xia Zhuo said unconvinced, and then threw a subversive question:
"We spend all our time picking quilts, so why not spend more time studying hard?"
Are these two questions difficult to answer? Of course not!
For those who have served in the army, this grandstanding question is too naive, because there was a big discussion on this issue in the army 30 years ago, and the final conclusion was exactly the same as that demonstrated by the three major laws.
First, it is not formalism for the trumpeter to perform in place.
This is a necessary ceremony to stimulate the sense of collective honor of soldiers, or to hone the fighting will of officers and men with a lot of sense of ceremony. It is naive to really think that this is what you will do when you start a war.
In other words, peacetime is peacetime and wartime is wartime.
If we abandon the sense of ritual of these trumpeters, then we should not spend a lot of manpower and material resources to engage in forward training before preparing for the military parade. Anyway, the best positive step has nothing to do with winning the battle.
By analogy, the time of queue training for recruits should be greatly reduced. Anyway, no matter how neat the queue is, you can't queue up for the battlefield in wartime.
In my opinion, this is a necessary form to cultivate collective consciousness and military honor, and it is not a waste of time, let alone formalism.
Second, fold the quilt into four squares.
"Super Brain" Xia Zhuo said that "picking quilts" is a waste of time, and this time should be used for reading and studying. This seemingly correct nonsense is actually untenable.
If you refute it on the other hand, you can ask: Is the dormitory as messy as a kennel, so you can study hard?
Reading is also very important for soldiers, but what is more important than reading is to cultivate the consciousness of loyalty, collectivity, discipline, fighting and tenacity, and the fearless spirit of sacrificing for the country and the nation.
Without loyalty, talking about reading and talent is nonsense. It is futile to talk about blood and martial spirit, and it is even more futile to talk about military reading and learning. In essence, a military camp is not a university or a scientific research institution.
Besides, there is no contradiction between folding quilts and studying. Walking in line and reading can also cross. Aside from the attributes of soldiers, talking about reading is a bookworm who studies and studies. How can such a person have a "super brain"
Is the "super brain" in The First Hero based on reading? Instead of surpassing the average person by innate IQ?
Third, it is funny that the brigade commander is serious?
Sacrificing the normal IQ of others, including the brigade commander, for the glory of the male host, is this to treat others in the play as fools or to treat the audience as IQ dysfunction?
If Xia Zhuo's view of "turning right angles saves time" is correct, wouldn't it be more time-saving to delete the whole scene of "The Trumpet in Place"?
This is a ritual performance, the purpose is to enhance the soldiers' sense of honor and collective consciousness, so that soldiers can feel the collective strength in uniform movements, which is essentially no different from military parade. As a result, the man insisted that the performance was not conducive to actual combat. Isn't this ridiculous?
Xia Zhuo is a recruit, and it is understandable to ask some questions about pediatrics, but the brigade commander is still sitting at his desk, carefully calculating how much time he has saved. It is really inappropriate for such a bad story to appear in legionary teleplay.
Make up stories, for the sake of the halo on a man's head, do not hesitate to make others stupid. It is said that there may be a love drama behind it. It's strange that the ending of this play is not bad!
It is foreseeable that if a love drama is added later, I can guarantee that the score of the drama is below 6 in Douban, otherwise I will write the word "Xu" upside down.
In recent years, with the constant changes in the market and consumer demand, the e-commerce industry has also ushered in