Men and women who took wedding photos in Nagoya, Japan on April 4, 2022 14. Visual data map

"What makes you keep your old surname even if you get married?"

When asked about this question, 65-year-old Dean Yukio told this newspaper (www.thepaper.cn) indifferently, "The reason is very simple and simple. If my name changes, I am not me. "

1983, Dean, living in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan, registered marriage with her husband, taking his surname. Seven years later, in order to change her original surname, she agreed to divorce her husband. Since then, the two sides have maintained the form of de facto marriage (living together in the name of husband and wife, but not registered marriage) until today.

Japan is the only developed country that stipulates that couples must have the same surname. For Japan at that time, it was "natural" for husband and wife to have the same surname, and the choice of land was very rare. However, with the changes of the times, more and more people want to introduce the "selective couple surname system".

They want to change for many reasons. Some women who "lose their surnames" after marriage want to be respected, and some couples think that husband and wife can achieve equality in their relationship through different surnames. Some women in the workplace have brought a lot of trouble to their work after changing their surnames, and some business people have brought a lot of inconvenience to the company's business because of the use of "common names" (editor's note: husband and wife share the same surname in household registration, but use the old surname in daily life).

And the voice that requires revision has always existed. As early as 20 1 1, there was a lawsuit called "Choose a couple with different surnames". At that time, five Japanese filed a lawsuit, arguing that the husband and wife sharing the same surname was indirect discrimination against women and violated the principle of "everyone is equal" in this book. However, this effort ended in failure. In 2022, Japan made a higher judgment, saying that it is unacceptable for couples to have different surnames, and it is appropriate to change their surnames after marriage.

In 2022, the defense team decided to take action again, and convened several parties who lived in the form of de facto marriage because of the stipulation that they could not get married under different surnames, and launched the "second lawsuit for choosing couples' surnames" again in Tokyo Metropolitan Office, Tokyo Lichuan Branch and Hiroshima. Unsurprisingly, in June this year, Gao gave the same judgment-the rule of husband and wife sharing the same surname was "consistent".

On June 23rd, the plaintiff and the defense team went to by going up one flight of stairs. : Daily News

After decades of discussion and two prosecutions, it is still difficult to implement the selective husband and wife surname system in Japan. What is the reason? Can this system be realized in Japan? How do supporters fight for it? What changes have taken place in the two lawsuits? Will the future be adjusted ... In the changing environment, several interviewees told this newspaper that although they saw a glimmer of hope, they could not tell when their demands would be realized in the "tug-of-war" with them.

The reality of "marriage"

Dean is one of the plaintiffs in Hiroshima's "Second Litigation for Couples with Different Surnames". Compared with the traditional "Japanese husband and wife life" in many people's minds, Dean is more special. This is a stressful but happy experience, because she has been working tirelessly for her rights.

When Dean and her husband registered to get married 38 years ago, she didn't want to change her surname. But at that time, there was almost no precedent around her, and the form of "no change of surname after marriage" was not common.

Japan stipulates that men and women must have a unified surname after marriage. This system can be traced back to the Meiji Civil Law passed in 1898. At that time, the civil law stipulated that unless there were special circumstances, a woman had to change her surname to that of the head of the household. Nimia Zhou Ping, a professor at Ritsumeikan University and a Japanese civil law scholar, told the newspaper that under the "family system" at that time, as the head of the family, the position of the head of the household was in principle held by the oldest man. "During the period of rapid economic growth in Japan after the World War II, the patriarchal consciousness derived from this system continued to penetrate." Er Gong said that the gender division of labor and "husband's surname" at that time were also taken for granted.

With the development, Japan adjusted this content when it revised the civil law in 1947, stipulating that both men and women must change their surnames when registering for marriage. Although this seems fair, according to the statistics of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2022, the phenomenon of women's "husband's surname" is more common in Japan, and 96% of couples adopt the form of changing the woman's surname to the man's surname when registering for marriage.

On May 1 day local time, in Tokyo, Japan, couples registered to get married. Visual data map

Therefore, driven by the general environment, Dean didn't have the courage to question this system. Although her husband readily suggested that she could change her surname, she admitted that it was "unusual" in Japan at that time and was not her intention.

Finally, she changed her surname like a so-called "ordinary" wife in Japan at that time. But the difference is that Enli took a special approach. She uses the form of "common name" to let close people call her by her previous surname.

I thought this way would ease my mood, but I don't feel practical.

"In addition to all passports and diaries being' new names' (note: Japan has implemented a system that allows all kinds of diaries to record the old surname and change the surname at the same time), I also want to use my registered surname at work." Good memories, the cruelty of the facts does not stop there. With the birth of one of my children and her husband's surname, on many occasions, everyone will call her husband's surname. Since then, the old surname has rarely been used.

"Why should I use another name when I am kind?" She always has doubts when signing various documents. Frankly speaking, there has always been a gap in my heart. Every time I use a new surname, I feel heartache, even disgust, and even have a sense of anxiety-I want to take it off.

"I want to change this situation anyway." With this in mind, they got married for seven years, 1990, and after consultation with their husbands, they finally submitted a divorce agreement. Since then, she has gracefully restored her real name and continued to live with her husband in the form of de facto marriage.

"This was really unacceptable in Japan at that time, but it was the road that my husband and wife decided together. After this situation was announced, everyone also expressed understanding. " He told the newspaper with an elegant smile that although he didn't know whether people around him had made any comments behind their backs, they even accepted this situation in good faith 30 years ago, when "choosing the couple's surname" and "de facto marriage" were quite rare.

Fortunately, the United States (third from the right). Photo courtesy of respondents

However, the reality of de facto marriage is not as smooth as she imagined, and some of the "big troubles" also make En feel the gap between herself and other couples.

Since the de facto marriage is not a marriage relationship, although there will be no big trouble in daily life, she said that once the spouse needs surgery or hospitalization, she can't prove her identity when signing the consent form. However, in the case of the death of the spouse, if the spouse does not stay, the partner of the de facto marriage will not be able to enjoy the deduction of the spouse's inheritance, which will cause considerable trouble.

Professor Ergong also told the newspaper that in Japan, de facto married couples face more troubles than marriage.

First of all, the children of de facto married couples will be marked as "illegitimate children", and parents cannot exercise parental rights (custody, etc.). ). If you need to fulfill the obligation of raising, the premise is that you need to go to the "cognitive link (using biological procedures to identify children)". Secondly, if de facto couples need treatment, most places will not provide any subsidies. Usually, married couples are eligible for this benefit. In addition, if one party of a de facto marriage dies, his partner cannot inherit his inheritance. Even if there is a will in advance, the partner cannot enjoy the special deduction for spouse and all other measures related to spouse stipulated in the current tax law.

"Article 750th of Japan's current civil law stipulates that when a husband and wife get married, both husband and wife must adopt the surname of one of them. Article 74 of the Law on Household Registration 1 also points out that when submitting an application for marriage, both husband and wife must choose the same surname. Therefore, couples who cannot make a choice will be excluded from marriage. " The plaintiff's defense lawyer Hayakasaka told this paper with a screwdriver in the second lawsuit of couples with different surnames. On the other hand, another defense lawyer of the plaintiff, Noguchi Minhiko, pointed out to this newspaper that the differential treatment between "those who want (or allow) the husband and wife to have the same surname (can get married online)" and "those who want the husband and wife to have different surnames (can't get married online) violates the principle advocated in Article 14-"Everyone is equal before the law without any form of discrimination ".

Under similar experiences, many parties who have experienced de facto marriage decided to take up arms. In 2022, several plaintiffs filed lawsuits in Tokyo Family Court, Tokyo Family Court Lichuan Branch and Hiroshima Prefecture, but the results were not satisfactory. Several lawsuits were ruled that "husband and wife share the same surname". In 2022, the plaintiffs of two lawsuits in Tokyo filed a special appeal against Tokyo Higher Education, which was officially opened on June 23 this year.

Judgment of "outdated"

Is it feasible to choose couples with different surnames? In fact, voices against the introduction of this system have always existed in Japan. The Japanese edition of Newsweek pointed out that as early as a lawsuit, some people questioned it in many aspects, including the impact of introducing the selective husband and wife surname system on families, children and families. The group opposed to the introduction of this system wrote in the book submitted to the Japanese parliament that year, "The system of husband and wife sharing the same surname can better reflect the deep ties between husband and wife, and it is also a system that can establish family relations ... If there are different surnames in a family, the family will also lose its sense of unity." Some opponents pointed out in an interview with Asahi Shimbun that "excessive respect for individuals led to the collapse of the traditional Japanese family system, which is the foundation."

Hidetsugu Yagi, a professor of science at Lize University, once pointed out that the current family registration system is based on the principle of "one surname". When a husband and wife get married, they will leave their parents' household registration and jointly establish a new household registration-at this time, taking the surname as the surname will also give their children the name. In this case, if the husband and wife choose different surnames, this household registration management system will be abolished, and there will be two surnames in one household registration, which will have an impact on the relevant property procedures.

Usami Dian, the former Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, also thinks that the system of choosing couples' surnames "is not suitable for the present marriage system". "Marriage is to legally enter the family register as a family and have the same surname. Moreover, the family is not a matter of one generation, but something handed down from generation to generation. " In an interview with Japanese ABEMA News, Yuzuo suggested that the rule of "husband and wife sharing the same surname" should be combined with all systems. If it is violated, it will lead to too many changes in the system, including family finance, inheritance and so on. Instead of linking people with the household registration system, it is better to establish a new system similar to de facto marriage so that people can get the same treatment as family members with the same surname. "

However, supporters emphasize that forcing couples to use the same surname obviously improves the rights of some people, and introducing the system that couples choose different surnames is not only a matter of a person's "personal symbol", but also a matter involving the principles of personal respect and family diversity.

"Husband and wife have the same surname for hundreds of years. In our parents' time, this was taken for granted. I can understand that many people are quite resistant to introducing couples with different surnames. "Gao Qiao Cai and Dr. Shui Ze are one of the plaintiffs in the Tokyo lawsuit. Since 2009, they have been living in the form of de facto marriage. Shui Ze told the newspaper that he thought that part of "exclusion" was "fear" of change, but at present, it cannot be ignored that many people are suffering from this system.

Gao Qiao said frankly to this newspaper, "It is better to want a different surname than to choose a de facto marriage, but there is no such option within the scope, so we can only seek this form." She said that when she was ready to get married, she and Shui Ze thought about what kind of husband and wife she wanted to be. "At that time, we agreed that this was one of the conditions for establishing a reciprocal relationship between husband and wife." Gao Qiao bluntly said that both of them were in their thirties when they got married. More than seven years have passed, and Gao Qiao really can't understand why he changed his surname.

On June 23rd, 2022, Gao Qiao and Shui Ze filed a "special application for marriage" when hearing the lawsuit of the couple with different surnames in the Japanese High Court. In the husband and wife column of the application, their surnames are written. In an interview with the media, they also said-"If the superior decides that the husband and wife's surnames are unconstitutional, they will register for marriage immediately."

At the press conference to accept the decision of the High Court that husband and wife share the same surname, Dr. Shui Ze and Gao Qiao Cai presented their prepared marriage applications. : Daily News

However, this application was not submitted at last.

On June 23rd, Japan's High Court ruled on the claims of three de facto married couples of Tokyo plaintiff. 15 officials, only four judges think that the couple's surnames are unconstitutional, and the other 1 1 judges all think that they are "consistent".

"Although it has been more than six years since the judgment in 2022, the situation and people's understanding have changed a lot, but it is still impossible to make a judgment that it is illegal for couples to have the same surname." Magistrate Naoto ōtani said after the verdict that the question of "what kind of system is appropriate" and whether the husband and wife have the same surname violate this question is not a higher judgment-it should be handed over to Congress.

As soon as the verdict came out, the voice of dissatisfaction on Japanese social media was high. Critics pointed out that the judgment was "outdated" and contributed to the problem of gender inequality in Japan, while another commented that Higher "had no intention of giving a reasonable judgment" from the beginning.

Gao Qiao told the newspaper frankly that topics such as gender equality and diversity have become the world's topics. With this background and the unremitting efforts of the plaintiff's lawyer team, although he doesn't believe that 100% will win, he is full of expectations for the future.

"Maybe people who want to marry other surnames are still a minority in Japan, but I hope our company can clearly see the troubles of people who can't register for marriage online under the current system." Gao Qiao bluntly said that the result of this lawsuit seems to reflect that the higher authorities failed to see the problems faced by de facto married couples and their real demands.

Shui Ze even told the newspaper that after the list of judges in this lawsuit was published, he had a hunch that the result of this lawsuit would still be the same as that in 2022.

"In 15 judges, there are only two female judges. It is strange to think about the ratio of men to women. " Shui Ze told the newspaper, "This ratio clearly reflects the male-centered environment. I'm not sure if they can really think of how much unequal treatment women have received because of this system (husband and wife have the same surname). "

"So I had a hunch from the beginning that the outcome of the lawsuit could not be as we hoped, which is also a reality. Japan's judicial system is disappointing. " Shui Ze said.

Japan is higher. Visual data map

The last nail

However, the discussion between supporters and opponents on introducing the system of selective husband and wife surnames is not limited to these two lawsuits, and this topic was raised as early as 25 years ago.

Asahi Shimbun reported that in the 1980s, with the signing of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the increase in the proportion of female employees, new changes and the progress of the times, the Japanese Law Review Council stated in the mid-1990s that in the future, the surnames of all family members could be recorded in the household registration, and selective couples were allowed to choose different surnames. At that time, there were "overwhelming" positive opinions on the introduction of this system in the Legislative Council, and they were very optimistic about the future, but unexpectedly, this discussion faced strong opposition from the ruling party.

"It is an unwritten rule that bills of various institutions must be submitted to the ruling party before they are submitted to Congress." Nobuyuki Koike, then a legislator, recalled in an interview with Asahi Shimbun that from 1995 to 1996, he explained the system of choosing couples' surnames to nearly 200 legislators, but contrary to the expectations of legislators, the conservative department headed by him strongly opposed it.

At that time, the conservative opposition was nothing more than "it would lead to the collapse of the family", "it would damage the sense of unity of the family" and "it would affect the parent-child relationship". Unable to gain the understanding of the ruling party, the Ministry of Justice decided to terminate the proposal. Koike pointed out that 25 years ago, he faced "unexpected obstacles", and 25 years ago, his attitude towards this issue remained unchanged.

"It is a strong opposition, and family may also be an identity." Professor Tsunami Tanshui, who studies family studies at Ritsumeikan University, also pointed out to the newspaper that choosing a couple's surname is different from the traditional family view, so many people object. He also stressed that "one of the simplest reasons for opposition lies in our' inflated patriarchal value system', which we are still strangling after more than 20 years."

In fact, except for, all other political parties agree to adopt this system. The opposition party has submitted bills to the National Assembly many times, asking for amendments again, but these bills have been rejected many times under the opposition of the opposition party. Ms Kimura, a professor of law at the City University of Tokyo, also told the newspaper that if we vote by a majority vote in the National Assembly without any preconditions, maybe we can choose different surnames for the couple. "But the problem lies in the majority of Congress, because some members who oppose the introduction system occupy a certain position. Unless the internal' tough opposition' disappears completely, the party will not start." Kimura believes that as far as the current situation is concerned, Congress will not act before "taking action".

But Tanai told the newspaper that Japan is the only developed country in the world that still retains the compulsory system of husband and wife sharing the same surname, so he and experts have been discussing how to return to the "universal tide". One of the "last nails" is still.

Congress has been slow for several years, and supporters try to pin their hopes on litigation, but even higher, they still emphasize that this issue should be "handed over to Congress". From this point of view, the introduction of the selective husband and wife surname system seems to be in a "dead end". Some critics believe that the judgment is still affected, and Noguchi's lawyer agrees.

"I think they () also understand that they can't give a reasonable explanation for why there are such differences, so they can only escape by' handing them over to Congress for trial'." Lawyer Noguchi told the newspaper that the statement about "constitutionality" in the book of the second lawsuit was only one page, and there was almost no content. Especially for the central argument that "the differential treatment of de facto married couples violates 14" in this case, the dissident only dismissed it on the grounds of "lack of premise" and "completely incomprehensible".

Noguchi said frankly that although many people have said that this trend has decreased recently, Japan has had a negative judicial existence since the past, which is a highly targeted topic, and the judiciary cannot give a thorough judgment.

"It should be an important role to protect the rights and interests of the minority when the majority rule". If (especially high) chooses to avoid and shelve the rights and interests of minority groups in the face of high-level problems, then I also want to ask (especially high) what kind of concept is used to report, do you really know what kind of mission you are shouldering? Noguchi said frankly in an interview with the newspaper.

The sound is continuous.

Although the "nail" has not been pulled out and the outcome of the lawsuit has not changed, the supporters of selective couples have changed a lot compared with a lawsuit even forty years ago.

Kaori, the vice president of "Half-surname Couples Litigation Support Association" and a small plaintiff in the case of half-surname couples, also told this newspaper that he had heard many voices during these six years. For example, in order to seek the understanding of local councillors and congressmen on the system of selective couples' surnames, activities are being carried out continuously, and the economic circles have also launched a signature campaign to appeal. In addition, when Japan formulated the "fifth participation of men and women" (promoting the joint participation of men and women) plan, some young groups also made suggestions to the cabinet to help promote the introduction of this system.

Hui Mei Ueda of the Litigation Support Association for Couples with Different Surnames told this newspaper that during these six years, she has seen changes and progress, and the atmosphere is also changing.

Ueda said that since 2022, several couples have been involved in related lawsuits. In addition to the three lawsuits supported by the group, there are two other lawsuits with different starting points. "In the past, many people thought that the choice of husband and wife's surname was only a woman's problem, but in fact, it has become a diversified topic related to men and others. Ueda said that in addition, the voice of the economic community for this system is getting higher and higher.

The growing voice of economic circles has really aroused great concern. Julia Keijiu, president of Japanese Cybozu Software Company, is a typical example representing the economic circle. Julia is the plaintiff of another lawsuit in which couples choose different surnames, and also the initiator of the signature activity "Company operators support couples to choose different surnames".

With the slogan of "realizing the ability to play regardless of gender, realizing diversification, and recognizing the legalization of the system of selective couples' surnames", a signing activity of "Company Operators Supporting Selective Couples' Surnames" was held in April this year in just one month, and thousands of company operators signed it, including executives from well-known Japanese companies such as Sumitomo Life Insurance and Daiwa Securities.

"It is very rare for company operators to express their opinions on the topic." Julia admitted that after more and more people chose to use their old surnames in the workplace, quite a few Japanese companies had some problems. The door, comprehensive department, financial department and even information system management department within the enterprise will face double loads. If there is a system of choosing the surname of husband and wife, this "redundant work" will disappear.

Julia told the newspaper that this signature activity has won the support of more and more senior executives from banks, insurance companies and securities companies. Especially with the support of "a well-known big company", he became more and more aware of the significance of introducing "selective half-surname couples".

Keihisa Aono, President of Japan Cybozu Software Company. Photo courtesy of respondents

"The voice of the economic community is very important." Professor Ergong said that under the current circumstances, if the executives can make reasonable judgments, not only couples with other surnames, but also same-sex marriages and sexual minorities can work with more peace of mind, and they can also create certain competitiveness in the era of cultural environment and personal ability. Similarly, if the economic community takes action, it will inevitably make some changes. "Therefore, the activities initiated by Julia are very meaningful," stressed Professor Ergong.

In addition to economic trends, spontaneous activities are also exciting.

Lawyer Noguchi pointed out that the loss in 2022 "ignited" a fire in many people's hearts. In addition to couples with different surnames going to court, more and more people express their demands through parliamentarians and cabinets. Especially worth mentioning is the "National Action for Choosing Couples with Different Surnames" activity group led by Keita.

Keita Caisui, director of the National Action for Choosing Couples' Surnames. Photo courtesy of respondents

The "National Action for Choosing Couples' Surnames" was established in 2022, and its purpose was to "touch" the Congress by asking questions to members from all over the country.

When talking about why this method was adopted, Jing Tian said in an interview with the newspaper that after a lawsuit in which husband and wife had different surnames, she and other supporters had a lot of discussions on how to promote the selective husband and wife to have different surnames, and finally put forward two ways-enhancing the understanding of the system and seeking their support; And fight for their rights and interests through complaints.

"At that time, many people were calling for opposing the amendment, so I chose this way to enhance the understanding of Members." Jing Tian recalled that in 2022, after being successfully recognized by local councillors in her own region, she saw the hope that this form might be realized in many places, thus promoting the introduction of selective couple surnames. Therefore, this group came into being.

Since then, the "National Action to Choose Couples' Surnames" has been continuously extended from social Twitter. In the process of promotion, supporters seeking change in various regions have come into contact with minefields.

"The first person to find me was Okinawa Prefecture, and then there was Hokkaido. People with the same views came to me to set up a branch. Of course, a large number of members took the initiative to contact after seeing my interview content and began to help promote volunteer activities in various places. " Jing Tian said that although some members still questioned the activities in some regions, since 2022, more than 200 regional councils have agreed to introduce the choice of couples' surnames, and there have even been many cases of "unanimous approval by all members".

"Driven by activities, it is also constantly changing. In my eyes, there have been enough changes in these six years. " Minefield said.

In an online survey of 7,000 residents aged 20-60 in China initiated by Masayuki Morimura, a professor at Waseda University, and the National Action for Choosing Couples' Surnames last year, 7 1% of the respondents were in favor of "choosing couples' surnames", while only 14% were against it.

"The degree of this topic is getting higher and higher. In addition to the decrease in the proportion of opponents in the survey results, media reports and institutions that are conducting investigations are also increasing. " "I think maybe some people who have been stubbornly opposed to choosing husband and wife surnames will gradually realize that this situation is changing," Zhinian Juncheng, a member of the Association for Supporting Litigation with Non-surnames of Couples, told the newspaper.

Is the future "predictable"?

The people's ideas cannot be ignored, but it is still unclear whether the barriers can be broken and whether the "iron wheel" of Congress, which has been deadlocked for 25 years, can turn again.

"When can we introduce selective husband and wife surnames? "In the face of this question, some of the above-mentioned respondents saw hope, while others could not easily give an answer. However, they all told the newspaper that they would make continuous efforts to promote it, whether in the past, present or future.

"When we became the plaintiff, we were already forty years old. At that time, we thought, if we keep the status quo, our children and grandchildren will have no choice at this age, and that would be too sad. " Shui Ze told the newspaper that through these activities, he wanted to promote some changes while he still had the remaining ability.

President Julia told the newspaper that three years before he initiated the lawsuit, there was a state of "no discussion at all" in the internal affairs, which was gradually opposed by him. With the increase of people supporting the system, he also saw hope.

"I think that the introduction of selective couple surnames will be realized in the near future. "Julia said that an important opportunity this autumn is the House of Representatives. If the number of MPs who opposed the system decreased at that time, choosing the couple's surname might be a more important step.

Minefield bluntly told the newspaper that although the conclusion of this issue should be reached in Congress first under the premise of "no clear division" with the judicial department, she believed that if there was a third lawsuit, the plaintiff would definitely win.

"But if there is the possibility of prosecution, you should give the final judgment after three years. Perhaps at that time, countless people were willing to participate in the lawsuit as plaintiffs, and the scope of the lawsuit will also be launched in quite a few areas of Japan. " Minefield affirmed, "We (supporters) must win next time."

Noguchi, on the other hand, said that many of his current activities, including the promotion of selective husband and wife surnames, are similar to helping "Japanese nationals regain the dominance of life from their hands." Noguchi said that all kinds of knowledge are very necessary for people to dominate in life. As a runner who supports these citizens, he will continue to be active in the future.

"The problem of couples choosing other surnames is actually a struggle with Japan's' natural' consciousness. "Lawyer Hayakasaka told the newspaper bluntly that up to now, many citizens are convinced of the concept of" taking one's husband's surname for granted ",but if we stop to think about it, we will find that this is an obviously unreasonable system.

Among them, one lawsuit after another about couples with different surnames gives people an opportunity to face up to the problem of "taking for granted" and makes more and more people start to think about it. With the second lawsuit of couples with different surnames, people realized that this was not "taken for granted". However, there are still some people who "refuse to understand" under the conservative concept, the multiple games under the bureaucratic system, the deep connection between the judiciary and the hierarchy, and the influence of Japan's centuries-old traditional concepts.

The "battle" of introducing selective husband and wife surnames has not stopped, but the voice of "pursuing one's own happiness" has been constantly raised. In the near future, maybe Congress or a higher level will promote the gradual realization of this system, but for Japan, this is only a step to seek equality, but it will also be an important step.

(Li Tiantian, an intern of this newspaper, also contributed to this article. In this article, Dean is translated into Chinese by Geoff and Ueda Hui Mei, while Gao Qiao Cai and Dr. Shui Ze are aliases. )

Editor in charge: Zhang Wuwei

Proofreading: Liu Wei

The above is about the matching degree of couples in the name test, and it is about sharing. I watched the couple's name test, I hope this will help everyone!