At first, it was so close to the shore and the police that the water was knee-high. Which eye do you see the necessity of sacrificing yourself to save lives? Besides, shouldn't people who commit suicide be saved? What logic?
I have seen this video. The girl who committed suicide is not far from the police. Even if she can't swim, as long as she is not afraid of the cold, she can save her life. Of course, we can't ask the police to do everything, but it should be possible to save the people in front of us, not to mention our police and people's police. To tell the truth, this is the last time I saw the police. None of them died in front of these policemen. They should sincerely apologize to the public for their inaction.
It is wrong to answer "should" or "shouldn't". It should be to save people who want to die, not to give up decisively if they can. You must never trade one life for another. It is not worthwhile to trade your own life for those who are determined to die.
However, the suicide and drowning of girls in Wangshui, Anhui Province were not to save a girl who wanted to sacrifice her life. It is entirely possible to save her life without paying the price of her life. However, the police and auxiliary police are slow to act and the rescue measures are unfavorable. In this case, when the girl just dived, the water was not deep, and shallow water and deep water were still one step away. At this time, if you take emergency measures, you can directly pull the girl up. If the police take off their clothes and rush into the water while running, the situation will be very different. Therefore, it is not groundless for netizens to accuse the police of failing to fulfill their rescue obligations. The eyes of netizens are still sharp.
The People's Police Law clearly stipulates that the people's police should immediately rescue citizens when their personal and property safety is violated or they are in other dangerous situations. When you wear this police uniform, you have more obligations and responsibilities. You are different from other civil servants. You are always ready to die for the interests of the people, even if you become a martyr, otherwise, you don't deserve to wear this police uniform!
I think it is glorious and great for the people's police to give their lives to save people, and it is shameful for the martyrs to retreat.
So close, if rescued properly, the girl can be saved without sacrifice! If they were their own relatives, would they do the same? People who want to die don't have to be saved?
Everyone blames the attitude of the police to save lives, not because they can't swim. Everyone knows that they don't want the police to die. But are your slow movements saving lives? Finally, I said I tried my best. It is clear in the video that several policemen are slow, why do the people who save people behind them run fast? You can't swim. You call for people who can swim. I really tried my best, and I believe many people will understand.
Is it wrong for netizens to criticize and question the drowning incident of Anhui 17-year-old girls? Shouldn't it? Why do you have to look at this matter from the perspective of life? Why do we have to expand this incident infinitely, making us nervous and scared? Why must we distort the facts, go to the top or deliberately exaggerate?
In this society, there are many people who want to commit suicide. How can we not be destroyed? Suicide and suicide have personal and social reasons? Suicide and suicide are much better than those who endanger and retaliate against society. Why don't we save them? Why kill them with a stick?
If you really want to save a person who wants to die at the cost of life, I think it should be worth a try! Even if we really let our hero fall in the process of rescue, our hero will die gloriously.
We live in the same society, and social responsibility and social morality need us to safeguard. Especially those professionals and functional departments, should shoulder the mission of the times. Every life is equal, but equal life has a completely different experience. We don't expect every life to shine, but we expect every life to live with dignity, confidence and a clear conscience.
There is nothing wrong with saving the life of the person who committed suicide by throwing himself into the river at the cost of his life, but it is hypocritical to declare that he has done so. Facts speak louder than words and have no basis.
It is a fact that a 17-year-old child in Wangjiang committed suicide by throwing himself into the river, and it is also a fact that the police in Wangjiang police station failed to rescue the suicide girl. There is no reason to overturn the negligence of the police. Practically speaking, it is the main cause of official prestige and the serious consequence of bureaucratic formalism.
The Chinese nation has a history of thousands of years and a glorious and fine tradition. Courage is one of them. China people have saved the lives of countless people who committed suicide by throwing themselves into the river, and few people died. What about saving people who commit suicide at the cost of their lives? Utopians don't have to talk to reality, and their dangerous thoughts and theories will affect the social atmosphere and the future development of China.
Video images show that the river is not wide, the water is not deep, the water is not a torrent, the river is shallow and deep, and the deepest part is only about 3 meters. Besides the police, there are locals who know the river like the back of their hands. It took 27 minutes to carry out the rescue. How long did it take? Many people look at the 17-year-old girl with wide eyes and commit suicide by throwing herself into the river, which is a social sorrow and a serious consequence of sorrow. Must bear the consequences.
In ancient times, they left a wise saying, there was no Jin Gangzuan in their hands, no porcelain work, the police could not play an official role, and set up a cordon to prevent water-based audiences from approaching girls. Besides, each of them has ulterior motives, how slow their actions are, and how incapable they are of becoming heroes. What are the problems?
If you can't swim, you won't necessarily die if you go into the water to save people. Your own desire for survival must be there! Is it unreasonable to ask local people who know how to save lives? The big-tailed wolf was not caught by the police, which led to the failure of saving people. It is doubtful whether these policemen really don't know how to save lives. It is strange that several big men are afraid of water. Besides, how can you know that you can lose your life before you try? It's hard to believe that no matter how well a lie is made up, someone will believe it. Lies are divorced from reality.
Going to the police is to save lives. It's not a question of whether or not. People committed suicide by jumping off a building, but you went to the police and didn't save people. Said it was a landlubber. What kind of police are you? Is it too boring to watch the suicide scene at the police station?
When it comes to risk, everything is risky, even eating is risky, eating hard is risky, eating fast is risky, and eating too much is risky. Think about whether to save people who want to die. The key is to have a correct and rapid assessment of the risk value of saving people at that time. As far as the An Wei police went out to rescue the dead girl, the police responded late and failed to rescue her decisively in an effective time, which turned the avoidable misfortune into misfortune.