"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do." This famous saying is that anyone who reads any book can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things.

The Bishgachu in Nikolai Nikolai Gogol's Ghosts reads everything. He is not a man who reads widely, but a fool who lacks taste. Zhu Zeman in Zhuangzi Lieyu Crown learned a stunt of killing dragons. In fact, there is no place to kill dragons. Only then did he realize that there was no dragon in the world, and all his skills were in vain. In this way, it is always half the effort to open books indiscriminately, and it is not worth the loss!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining.

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Eating red dates is harmful to teeth; Taking this medicine is good for your health, but it also has side effects.

British writer Fielding said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you." If one-sided understanding of "open book is beneficial" means reading all the books, without choosing or asking the content, reading will be beneficial, but it is actually wrong! Be sure to learn a skill and choose the most valuable, insightful and good books that are suitable for you to read.

Therefore, I hope everyone will remember that opening books may not be beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is completely correct.

Although it is an idiom that opening books is beneficial, I believe that blind opening books may not be beneficial.

"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do." This famous saying is that anyone who reads any book can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things.

The Bishgachu in Nikolai Nikolai Gogol's Ghosts reads everything. He is not a man who reads widely, but a fool who lacks taste. Zhu Zeman in Zhuangzi Lieyu Crown learned a stunt of killing dragons. In fact, there is no place to kill dragons. Only then did he realize that there was no dragon in the world, and all his skills were in vain. In this way, it is always half the effort to open books indiscriminately, and it is not worth the loss!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining.

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Eating red dates is harmful to teeth; Taking this medicine is good for your health, but it also has side effects.

British writer Fielding said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you." If one-sided understanding of "open book is beneficial" means reading all the books, without choosing or asking the content, reading will be beneficial, but it is actually wrong! Be sure to learn a skill and choose the most valuable, insightful and good books that are suitable for you to read.

Therefore, I hope everyone will remember that opening books may not be beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is completely correct.

In favor: it is beneficial to open books.

In this information-based world, reading is one of the only ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more books can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary accomplishment, which is of great help to our future speaking and writing.

Our knowledge is like a reservoir. A lot of reading enables our reservoir to store a lot of knowledge, and while we supplement our knowledge, our knowledge is constantly leaking out. At this time, if we stop reading or read less, the water in the reservoir will soon run out. Only by constantly enriching extracurricular reading can we enrich our knowledge without losing a lot. A lot of knowledge can provide enough material for your composition, otherwise you will only write some meaningless repetitive words if you hold it for a long time.

-

The origin of the benefits of opening books is that Song Taizu said, "As long as you study, it is always beneficial." Since then, it has become an idiom to open books.

You may think, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is simple, the key lies in the word "total" ... which means there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial to opening books rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. You will understand the reason after reading it. )

First of all, it is well known that it is good for good books. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages of their own. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Little ones should learn several writing methods, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't produce a certain * * * sound with readers and can't let people go deep into them? If the structure and layout, expression, conception and description, language and writing of this book are plain,

Even the general "running account" composition is not as good as it is, how can it produce a * * * sound with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.

Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and it is full of wrong sentences and typos …" until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought that even if there is such a book, can anyone understand it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, I don't even have the premise of "opening the book". How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It only shows that the reader's own mentality is wrong. It's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame it on books. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?

Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it is beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.

As for "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening a book is not beneficial, so there is a problem: harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's digging? If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can be established naturally, but it is wrong to say "useless" ~ So, on this issue, the argument against it is only half right. (And this half is a positive argument) Wolai tells you how to argue that the origin of good open-book is a sentence by Song Taizu: "As long as you study ~ it is always beneficial". Since then,

You may think, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is simple, the key lies in the word "total" ... which means there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial to opening books rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. You will understand the reason after reading it. )

First of all, it is well known that it is good for good books. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages of their own. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Little ones should learn several writing methods, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't produce a certain * * * sound with readers and can't let people go deep into them? If the structure and layout, expression, conception and description, language and writing of this book are plain,

Even the general "running account" composition is not as good as it is, how can it produce a * * * sound with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.

Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and it is full of wrong sentences and typos …" until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought that even if there is such a book, can anyone understand it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, I don't even have the premise of "opening the book". How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It only shows that the reader's own mentality is wrong. It's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame it on books. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?

Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it is beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.

As for "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening a book is not beneficial, so there is a problem: harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's digging? If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can naturally be established, but it is wrong to say "useless". Therefore, on this issue, the opposing argument is only half right (and this half is still a positive argument).

Since the positive forum is definitely established and the negative argument is only half established, what is the reason for the argument? Obviously, the square is invincible!

People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, after careful consideration, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.

Nowadays, students may all like to read martial arts and romance novels, books and periodicals, and sometimes forget to eat or sleep. Once they get lost in reading, they will be possessed. Then they concentrate on books in class and have no intention to study, and their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes take the road of crime. Isn't reading killing yourself? This is only the first layer of "opening books is beneficial": opening books is beneficial. And the second floor.

The second is that we should have a choice when studying. Don't read unhealthy books that don't help us much. When reading, you should read some books that are beneficial to your physical and mental health and helpful to your study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, you will make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading will be beneficial to you. Therefore, in my opinion, opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read a wrong book.

I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, they have two functions: first, good medicine will cure diseases; One is poison, which can kill people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 1920s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrdom because of its bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to a decline in their academic performance, and finally draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open a book depends on what volume to open first.

A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat more. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously about reading, but just skim it. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude. How can such an "open book" be useful?

As an emphasis on the importance of reading, the idiom "opening books is beneficial" naturally has its positive significance, but it is inappropriate to judge that "opening books is beneficial".

"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do." This famous saying is that anyone who reads any book can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things.

The Bishgachu in Nikolai Nikolai Gogol's Ghosts reads everything. He is not a man who reads widely, but a fool who lacks taste. Zhu Zeman in Zhuangzi Lieyu Crown learned a stunt of killing dragons. In fact, there is no place to kill dragons. Only then did he realize that there was no dragon in the world, and all his skills were in vain. In this way, it is always half the effort to open books indiscriminately, and it is not worth the loss!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining.

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Eating red dates is harmful to teeth; Taking this medicine is good for your health, but it also has side effects.

British writer Fielding said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you." If one-sided understanding of "open book is beneficial" means reading all the books, without choosing or asking the content, reading will be beneficial, but it is actually wrong! Be sure to learn a skill and choose the most valuable, insightful and good books that are suitable for you to read.