Excellent essay model for college entrance examination
Scores are not the standard.
I saw such a thought-provoking cartoon: in the first picture, a smiling child is holding a 100 paper with lip prints encouraged by his parents on his cheek, which is in stark contrast to another child holding a 55-point paper, and his sad face is shocking; In the second picture, the child who got 100 only got 98, and a slap was added to his face, while another child got a kiss from his parents because he got 6 1 this time.
This cartoon reflects the current situation that parents pay too much attention to their children's grades. "A child will fight when he steps backwards, and progress will boast, as if the bright red numbers on white paper are the standard to measure him, as if the cold grades are everything to the child. I understand that parents want their children to succeed, but I think their "achievement-only theory" of paying too much attention to their children's achievements is not conducive to their healthy development.
Privately, children are not as happy as before, and the increasing academic pressure is an extremely important reason. Parents have placed too much expectation on their children, and the strict requirements for their children have become cruel shackles, firmly binding their children outside the gorgeous dreams of childhood. I know many children who are afraid of being baptized by their parents when they fail in the exam. They shudder at the thought of the exam. Their happy childhood has been fragmented and never existed in a distant corner of their memory. Indeed, they are all children in comics. Whether it is 55 or 98, as long as it is not up to standard, it will be scolded by parents. The author once heard such a sentence: "You broke my wings, but you blame me for not flying." The parents in the cartoon broke their children's wings with strict requirements for "points" When "fen" really becomes their "life root", children have already lost the ability to fly freely.
However, it turns out that scores are not the standard for evaluating children. Kindness, courage, responsibility and so on may be smarter and more valuable qualities than cleverness. Similarly, scores do not necessarily represent children's future achievements. Ma Yun, whose middle school grades are average, has become today's Internet tycoon; Liu Yong, who repeatedly failed in the imperial examination, left touching words for future generations in his Shallow Singing.
Therefore, I urge parents not to let their children become children in cartoons or lose themselves in grades. I hope that parents should pay attention to other aspects while paying attention to their children's grades, so that their children can grow up in a balanced, comprehensive and happy way.
You know, whether a child gets 55 points, 6 1 point, 98 points, or 100 points, it is worth leaving a affectionate kiss on his face. I hope that the children's misfortunes in cartoons will be less copied on the children around me!
Excellent essay model for college entrance examination
The Sorrow of Fractional Theory
A clearly marked slap and a loving kiss have become a barometer of parents' emotions, affecting the hearts of countless candidates in China. Here, the author is deeply touched and can't help but sigh. Why bother to be a sad and happy score for a family? Family education must not "only score" to make children grow up healthily.
Although the slogan of quality education is very loud, parents and schools still can't get rid of the shackles of the concept of "score first" for a long time. What is the significant difference between 100 and 98? Can a child's quality be evaluated by only two points? However, it is unreasonable to treat children one by one. Look at the progress from 55 points to 6 1 point, which deserves encouragement and praise. However, parents should not be harsh if their children try their best to get 55 points. Fraction and quality are never natural equals, so they should not be tempted by "fractional determinism".
Under exam-oriented education, exams become a burden for children's happy growth, and the haze of pressure obscures the sunshine of growth. "Achievement is the lifeblood of students." This joke, which has been circulating for many years, reflects the present situation of children in China. The pressure of the exam makes children gradually sacrifice their entertainment time, keep an eye on the bright red scores on the test paper, and do everything possible to argue about the scores. The pressure from parents has played the role of booster, cram school, Olympic Games class, piles of tutorial books ... In the "score first" environment, children have to suppress their playful nature. On the other hand, in foreign countries, Europe and the United States never take scores as the standard for evaluating competitions. They advocate conforming to children's nature, encouraging children to develop their personal interests, chasing and playing in the wild, and letting children develop freely and healthily. What is urgently needed today is not to judge success or failure by scores, but to give children a happy childhood.
When the score becomes the weather vane, the purpose of learning deviates from the essence of seeking knowledge and weakens children's creativity. Qian Xuesen once asked: "Why can't China produce innovative talents?" Let's take a look at the candidates in China today. If the score is the center, they will take the standard answer as the standard. Taking grades as the ultimate goal of learning will definitely weaken students' ability to think and explore independently. Students only care about how many points their answers can get, but rarely jump out of the shackles of standard answers and examine and question the answers. No wonder China lacks innovative talents. It is better to pay attention to students' independent thinking ability and innovative spirit, rather than grades, so that an innovative society and the rejuvenation of China can be achieved in a few days.
Admittedly, from the current situation in China, examination is still the most effective way to select talents, but the "score-only theory" has many disadvantages. Can we gradually eliminate the utilitarian pursuit of scores and gradually evaluate children from a more diverse perspective?
Cai Yuanpei once said: "to have a good society, we must first have good individuals;" To have a good individual, we must first have a good education. " If you don't start from now, start from the side, refuse to judge success or failure by scores, and your child will grow up healthily in a blue sky.
Excellent essay model for college entrance examination
Kissing on the face is the pain of education.
A paper, a little floating, get a slap and kiss. Is it? No? Respond with a helpless smile
On the surface, the mother blames the child who has regressed from perfect score to 98, but loves to kiss the child who failed at first and then made progress. Does this only show that it is desirable for mothers to encourage progress and inappropriate to criticize retrogression? That was not the case. In this cartoon, we should see that only a little change in the score is enough to make parents react completely differently, and the similar scenes of countless families reflected behind it are inevitably thought-provoking.
It is not the behavior of individual parents to keep an eye on the score, take the advance and retreat of the score as the reward and punishment standard, and the resulting state of perfection and blame. The absurd phenomenon of getting a kiss out of a perfect score and getting a slap in the face out of a 98 is the embodiment of the score-only theory that has been criticized for a long time. When parents don't care about the knowledge mastery and guiding learning function reflected behind the score, they no longer care about the fact that "98 points are very close to full marks", but only see that they have regressed by 2 points compared with the last time, and they can't tell whether "55 points or 6 1 points means that their children's learning situation is not good", but just pay attention. In addition to irony, we can't help but ask: Where did such rude treatment and obsession with scores come from?
Of course, the fierce competitive environment and China's tradition of attaching importance to exams have led to people's extensive concern about exam results to a certain extent, but is there a deeper and more essential reason? Isn't it that we lack objective and comprehensive evaluation criteria for children's growth and ignore and forget other aspects besides learning? In ancient times, there was a kind of "learning for oneself", the purpose of which was to cultivate a perfect personality, not to obtain an official position recognized by the outside world. Today's society needs talents with excellent comprehensive quality and sound personality, not fractional talents nourished by slaps and kisses. Don't you see that in this year's campus poisoning case, although the scores of juvenile criminals are dazzling, their personalities are fatally flawed. If you only pay attention to the fluctuation of scores by slapping and kissing, can you still say that it is "educating people"? Is it a beam or a fast-growing wood, shiny on the outside and rotten on the inside?
The difference between the so-called perfect blame and tolerance and encouragement is a wake-up call to education, and the drawbacks of the educational concept revealed in it touch the pain point. We can't just stay behind "knowledge" and "change". We need to re-examine the familiar scenes in daily life with "learning from a painful experience" as the engine, and take this as an opportunity to give correct guidance and training on children's growth path, help them gain other excellent qualities and comprehensive abilities besides their achievements, repay them with real kisses, and treat their education with determination and persistence.
It doesn't work, right or wrong? Only by learning from a painful experience can we repay future education with singing.