"emptiness" is not "nothingness". For example, people dream, and dreams, like real life, have phenomena and images. These dreams are indeed tangible and have phases, but the essence of these phases is false, that is, they are all "empty". And because these dreams are all changed by the dreamer's imagination, everything in the dream is created by the dreamer, so: there is no difference.

This is the truth explained by Buddhists: reality is like a dream, and there is everything, but everything is false and self-fulfilling, so it is empty.

The so-called "sexual identity, no identity" is the truth.

Understand this truth for the sake of what? Is to guide real life. Tell us to reduce separation and persistence, thus reducing troubles. If you give up your obsession with "being", you can't cling to "emptiness". It is more troublesome to cling to emptiness. People who cling to "existence" are limited by secular truth, although it is artificial. Once they cling to "emptiness", they will lose all restrictions and become artificial.

We should know that all the laws in the Ten Dharma Boundaries are empty, but the cause and effect are not empty. If you don't practice according to the ten virtues, stick to the void, and act recklessly, you will inevitably be bound by the law of cause and effect, and you will not even get out of the six ways and fall into the three evil ways. I don't know how many times I have to go through it if I want to practice again.