Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - War movies are all anti-war. What did rage say? (furious) film reviews.
War movies are all anti-war. What did rage say? (furious) film reviews.
The rage score was 8. 1, but I really didn't expect much. First of all, war movies are not easy to shine, especially stories as old as World War II. To truly restore the battlefield, people feel like blockhouses. Not a few hundred million seems hard to get. War movies must have scenes, and when it comes to scenes, it's just a matter of money. "Zombie Country" tells us that those who talk about scenes and make them at a low cost are all bluffing and will be broken with a poke. The film didn't get any news until a few months before it was released, which shows that it is not an over-budget film. Director David Ayer has made several shocking films, all of which are rated around 7.5. Look at the lineup, including Brad Pitt, Shia LaBeouf and Roggemann. It seems that although it is not necessarily a classic masterpiece, it should not be bad.

After watching the movie, I did a lot of homework, because as a military fan, I had many problems. On the whole, most of the problems are reasonable.

Speaking of this movie, of course, the biggest desire to watch the movie belongs to the tank. Although the famous Porsche Company produced Tiger tanks, it is not without reason that it has many "German fans". The legendary story of Michael Whitman 1V25 Tiger Tank may be circulated by people for many years. The highlight of this film is a tiger tank that claims to be the only one that can be started in the world today, and four Sherman tanks that are also real guys. Judging from the film, the protagonists of these five tanks did live up to expectations, and the basic table restored the thrilling scene of "Sherman" killing tigers. After all, it's a real guy. Whether such a movie is a pure "anti-X drama" requires a lot of props first. 1945 You gave a whole "Tiger" modified with T54 and the like without straddle-mounted wheels, which looks terrible at first glance.

But to be honest, after watching the movie, it still gives people a feeling of "anti-German drama", because the climax of the crossroads is here.

It is said that American troops are afraid of death. Of course, this is all misinformation, really on the battlefield. Except for the exotic flowers of the Italians, most of them are normal, and no one is braver than anyone else. The intersection was blocked by mines in Tanqueray. The trace of depicting the arrangement is a bit thick, and there is almost no suspense in that half hour, as you can imagine (except that Pete's handsome boy still keeps his hairstyle unchanged after two wooden grenades are confined in the cabin, which is a bit unexpected). There must be soldiers like the Five Heroes of Langya Mountain in the US Army. Only by holding the crossroads can we protect the more than 2,000 unarmed civilians behind us. Unfortunately, this change is a bit hasty. The man is a veteran who killed all the way from South Africa to Europe. He kept talking about living and following me. If he wants to become a type of death, he will definitely need some drastic changes to make a natural transition. This is a big flaw in this film.

Generally speaking, the screenwriter's grasp of the overall story is not much problem, just a little mediocre.

A doll SS battalion with five people in a tank is not a myth, because after all, in reality, audie murphy, the prototype of Captain America, shot and killed 240 Germans by himself. ...

War movies have a natural attribute called "anti-war". Finally, let's talk about the "love bridge" in the middle that some people comment as "a little sleepy"

In this part, I personally want to know what kind of feelings the director and screenwriter want to express to the audience.

Give a chocolate and go to bed. This is indeed a historical restoration after the fight against Germany at that time. Even on the eastern front, the Soviets didn't give chocolate. There is not much "morality" and "justice" in the war, and this drama of men and women in rage is somewhat puzzling. Frankly speaking, the little gunner and little Emma's "cousin" are not true love, because from the beginning, it was essentially rape by force and soft coercion. Do you think it's true that you spent months reading palms? Do you think that being young is not rape? Ask the girl if she will let you touch it if you don't have a gun. So it makes me feel complicated. What this passage shows in the whole work is at least not the negative emotion of "disgust". What is it trying to say? Is it just a simple historical restoration and an independent and objective third-party movie clip?

This is a war film worth seeing, and it is also an intriguing "anti-war film".

Humans are essentially animals. At very special times, the brain will suddenly disappear, leaving only blood, adrenaline and sex organs.