How do experts come from and what is their social status?
Views on the phenomenon of experts everywhere today
The first part |? How do experts come from and what is their social status?
First of all, the origins of experts are "self-styled", not titles. Of course, those who are not so cheeky will only call themselves experts after they have a certain professional title and social recognition. In fact, experts usually fall into two categories:
First, real experts.
For example, Academician Zhong Nanshan and Academician Luo Xiang are both outstanding talents in a certain professional field. They answer professional questions, impart knowledge and spread energy to the public. They are recognized as real experts. Experts who focus on academic research, benefit the public and master professional knowledge and skills are also scarce in every industry in China.
Of course, giving the public correct and positive guidance within their own knowledge can also be called a real expert. For example, professors in universities, technicians in science and technology industries, engineers and technicians, etc. In the Internet age, professional things should of course be done by professional people, and as experts in professional fields, they should have rich professional knowledge and broad professional vision. At the same time, because of its broad professional vision, it should be more practical and valuable to give professional explanations to the public.
Second, pseudo-experts.
In the era of rapid development of the Internet, many "experts" do not hesitate to engage in academic fraud and academic corruption. In order to "make a living", discredit the whole knowledge group. In addition, in terms of media hype, the quality of experts on major platforms is mixed and needs to be considered. Pseudo-experts are such a group of people who, under the banner of experts, express their opinions and mislead ordinary people in order to meet the needs of some people, regardless of the facts.
Especially in a blog, an expert suggested that someone might have been cheated in the past, but now most of them are divorced from reality and self-righteous, so "advising experts not to suggest" appeared. This kind of crude, eye-catching and full-flow topic is not conducive to solving problems in practice, because the word "expert" keeps the debate on the Internet. So in fact, "pseudo-experts" are tools to create traffic.
The second part |? Views on the phenomenon of experts everywhere today
Nowadays, the internet is very developed, and people who have a certain position in a certain field and are recognized as having a certain right to speak must be responsible for their own remarks. For the public, they may not have a particularly strong ability to distinguish whether Internet information is correct or not. On the contrary, people who have in-depth research in this field have made statements that are divorced from reality or even untrue, which is misleading. Therefore, for the public, we should:
Don't believe the authoritative statements of authoritative people.
See the reality clearly and distinguish right from wrong.
Take the essence and discard the dross
For a large but small group of experts, I think we should improve our professional standards, and at the same time, we should not make suggestions that are divorced from reality. At present, there is a lack of experts who can really help the public solve problems and learn knowledge. The suggestion that "too long commuting time is not good for personal development" is nothing more than standing and talking.
Pseudo-experts should leave their narrow cognitive circle and pay more attention to the actual people's livelihood in order to become real experts trusted by the public. Under the authoritative shell guided by certain public opinion, people should have a serious and responsible attitude in the business world and stick to the initial intention of the industry in order to have correct development.